can some bitcoin cash supporter explain?
What is the problem with segwit
Other urls found in this thread:
It's up to Craig to explain.
God the things i would do to her feet
It wasn't segwit, it's that they wouldn't increase the blocksize and decided that hardforks could not happen under any circumstance.
Many people felt that there should be on chain scaling and off-chain solutions but forcing people off-chain was wrong. This was essentially proven by members of the core team now selling a "scaled" BTC as their own product a-la-liquid.
You faggots are the third group in the wood chipper.
it makes jihan's ASIC miners useless
that was always the root "problem"
What?
Die
>forcing people off-chain
how was it forced?
oh shit, who's 1 and 2?
(((them))) and niggers
how are furfaggots not ranked higher than foot fetishists? I mean they are both warped and due to be put up against the wall, but one is clearly worse than the other.
this
/thread
it complicates things a shit ton for at most 70% more tx/s. just trying to wrap your head around the concept of block weight is a nightmare. it increases bandwidth and hdd requirements by 300% even though tx increases by just 70%. it removes signatures from blocks that didn't upgrade to the new version.
instead of changing 1 line of code for 300% tx/s increase they changed 100000 lines of code for 70% tx/s increase at the cost of 300% hdd/bandwidth requirement and reduced simplicity.
Based and redpilled
>complaining about storage requirements when having 32-128mb blocks worsens the requirements exponentially
that's beyond the god damn point.
segwit added 70% tx/s and 300% hdd/bandwidth req
for the exact same 300% hdd/bandwidth req you could have gotten 300% more tx/s without SegWit and it wouldn't have increased complexity
well you can always increase the blocksize later
in fact, not increasing the blocksize is a smarter scaling solution for the same reasons you do not just build roads that are 2x wider if you have traffic jams
>ELIB problem with segwit
it's pic related user, nothing more, nothing less
God you retarded corecucks are fucking cancer. The type of cancer that is too stupid to realise it's cancer.
You swallow every fucking blue pill you're given.
Common sense states that if you simply increase the blocksize by a fucking few megs, the world won't fucking end. 5G internet runs at fucking 50,000 meg per second and you're worried about 1 meg per 10 minutes? You stupid fucking NPC.
Based and redlisted
>5G meme
This, and
Read about Graphene and similar protocols. There are solutions to this problem out there.
So many people here are missing the real problem with SegWit. It's not just that it's a pile of literal shit, the real problem is the reason it exists in the first place. AXA bought Blockstream, and they have every incentive to either slow the progress of BTC and/or centralize it to their benefit as much as is possible. This is the real goal of SegWit. It's really, really bad.
Since I have a kid, my sales have increased. I feel more confident. I wonder why ? someone else had this ?
>AXA bought blockstream
did you mean to make a new thread or are you confident your post will derail the thread
>:^)
Footfags are unironically worse than cucks.
Sorry, AXA gave Blockstream like $100 million. Totally not the same. Get fucked
footfags will be rounded up third on the day of the rope
that is one cheap fucking bathtub
gas yourself
>foot fetishists
i think you mean "pedicure pulverizers"
Watch this video for keks:
youtube.com
Also, segwit is a non-answer to scaling problems.
Sharing is caring, user. And I care for each and every nigger dick in a 5 mike radius