Do you even know what's the problem here?
A competitor can easily undercut Linkpool simply because Linkpool has to pay these "shareholders" who won't do anything except sitting on their ass, while the money can be used to scale up the business/raise incentive for stakers/get access to proprietary sources.
The guy who came up with this plan clearly has no clue how business works. Linkpool won't stand a chance in the long run.
kek, theyve said time and time again that they can drop the fees at any time. Try harder to fud
>Try harder to fud
having legit criticism is fud
holy fuck you're dumb
this
lmao i do not care. did you even read my post? do you really think the LP team is so ignorant as to not realize that monopolization of the space is disadvantageous to the network and that naturally competitor NaaS platforms will develop? that said name a better staking service than linkpool if you think that a competitor exists. if a more competitive option appears there is no barrier to moving towards their services. if you're just a fudding burger who wasn't eligible for the crowdsale due to the govts need to "protect" your mongoloid countrymen, then i get it, if not, you're one of the mongs
> if a more competitive option appears there is no barrier to moving towards their services.
Thank you for strengthening my argument.
Your reliance on wishful thinking and inability to make rational judgement are going to hurt you dearly.
Also, you are only further showcasing your illogical mind with ad hominem.
Assuming you've just changed ID from AGzHM05o, your initial argument is factually incorrect and your secondary argument is not so much an argument as it is a pedestrian observation of market dynamics. there -- no fallacious arguments for you, you massive fucking retard.