This can't be real

This can't be real.
It must be a lie.
Satoshi has to be someone who fits more to my own views.

Attached: IMG_20190523_001738.jpg (1125x613, 111K)

Other urls found in this thread:

copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html?loclr=twcop
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html?loclr=twcop

The era of shitcoin is over.
All in bsv

>g'day cunts it's me, I'm that bloke satoshi. I did the bitcoin and that honest I did.

It's over, Craig won.

>Satoshi has to be someone who fits more to my own views.
It pisses me off that this is the main driver behind people denying him being Satoshi. For that reason alone I hope that by some miracle he is indeed Satoshi, I want all of these braindead morons to get STIFF.

No, I'd be all behind him if he didn't feed his loyal followers fabricated garbage

Attached: 1556555387047.png (729x701, 124K)

> Craig Wright makes an application to the office saying that he's satoshi nakamoto
The fact that bsvjeets are unironically trying to tout this as proof basically proves they're brown cockroaches.
Imagine lacking such a basic level of reading comprehension.
Such is the state of the eternal bsv mouthbreather who falls for 50iq scams. I don't even have pity for you anymore. Just contempt.

>copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html?loclr=twcop
>Are you satoshi?
>Yep
>Ok then here's your copyright
so this means absolutely nothing then

"In a case in which a work is registered under a pseudonym, the Copyright Office does not investigate whether there is a provable connection between the claimant and the pseudonymous author."

"As a general rule, when the Copyright Office receives an application for registration, the claimant certifies as to the truth of the statements made in the submitted materials. The Copyright Office does not investigate the truth of any statement made."

You don't know that's how it went down.
I am a junior lawyer and though I don't specialize in copyright, I can tell you there was likely some kind of further confirmation than just asking the man "are you really sure you're Satoshi?" especially since this case is very high profile.
You can easily get all correspondence relating to the case through a FOIA request. Somebody should do it.
>As a general rule
Which in legalese means, "for most routine cases." I don't think this was a routine case, do you?

>Strewth! I'm satoshi cunt!

CHECKED

Attached: craigsfinalform.jpg (696x449, 55K)

(OP)
so creg confirmed he is the applicant for the copyright claim
with this he committed yet an other fraud
orange is the new black

except the US govt came out and said his claim, as stated, is full of shit

>Ok then here's your copyright
no such thing happened
more like this:
>mr wright can you confirm you lay claim to the copyrights of satoshi nakamoto full knowing you commit fraud if you are not actually him (not that we check)
>yes
>ok your registration is now official (liar)

Checked and stiff!

Attached: 1542134115701.jpg (619x622, 99K)

Read the rest of it, you stupid fucking brainlet.

Literally 0 verification, it all relies on him to "confirm". That confirmation is "Yes".

That's all he did.

I do like how it says people submitting false claims could be subject to penalties..

Attached: BTFO.png (950x677, 79K)

>2019
>still no signature
neat