When Craig signs and kills BTC for good?
What will you do
Lincoln Cruz
Cameron Lee
he wont, but ok ...
let's continue this stupid role playing shitshow, if he signs it and starts selling BTC and BCH to buy BSV it will drop to 3 digits.
Nicholas Wilson
wtf, did craig write that?
Isaac Nelson
Never, otherwise his drama would end and he couldn’t profit out of retards throwing money to a shitcoin
John Peterson
who's this Craig guy?
Cameron Brown
>alter the protocol
kek, ironically sv blocks are the only ones rejected by all old btc nodes
Christopher Brooks
Yes.
He is preparing to fuck all you core cucks and bcash frauds HARD. The stage is being set.
Christopher Adams
>Banks been accumulating BTC for years now
Not gonna happen. We love our financial institutions.
Caleb Davis
How does it feel knowing there is no way to stop this man? No amount of paid FUD can change what is pre-destined.
Satoshi is back, and he's mad as hell.
Robert Sanders
We've have this thread everyday.
Daniel Perez
>forging a dead man's signature and making up some imaginary trust
There is a special place in he for Craig
Gavin Perez
> Creator of Bitcoin - Satoshi Nakamoto
the worst thing about this picture, this is not the biggest lie
>My opinions are my own
Logan Lopez
I don't own any bitcoin, and never will, but why hasen't he signed the original block previously? Why is he waiting until the end of the month? What will you do when he doesn't eventually sign? Will you make more excuses or will you realize he's a fraud?
Lincoln Morgan
Yep. It's about fucking time, too. He should have come back earlier as soon as it started to become clear that the small blocker propaganda was starting to metastasize and the Greg clique was starting to take over the repository.
I suspect this didn't happen because Craig/Satoshi had the keys put into a trust and does not have access to them yet. He knew that the "community" of brainwashed idiots would resist the truth without a public signing, so he probably was hoping the situation would resolve itself. Once it became clear that that was not going to happen, he was forced to come out of retirement prematurely.
Henry Torres
He has copyright on Bitcoin whitepaper, so of course he is Satoshi.
Deal with it or go cry to mommy
Joshua Evans
Why do you think he owes you anything? Only complete retards with an IQ so low it doesn't even register in normal tests, doesn't know he is Satoshi already, I guess you are one of them.
Keep screaming for him to sign like a toddler, while he simply outplays you and your little cultist friends six ways to sunday.
Henry Hernandez
So you're not going to answer any of my questions? The weight of those BSV bags will probably approach infinity here in June.
Answer one of my questions: what happens if he doesn't sign 5/31?
Joshua Reed
> copyright
user, I ...
he is doing all of this jackshit, spends hours of hours on discussions, sueing people, getting insulted on and you tell me he doesnt owes us anything.
he could settle this all within minutes, but he doesnt, so what does it tell you about him?
Angel Green
>what happens if he doesn't sign 5/31?
i will open a very big short on bsv, and bagholders are gonna pay for it
BAGGIES BAGGIEEEEEES
Nathan Davis
in the astronomically unlikely event that btc is kill i'm gonna start buying eth.
Leo Ortiz
>pastor
Nolan Anderson
you're already capitulating that he will not sign... LMAO
Ian Smith
on the contrary only a complete drooling idiot would believe craigs lies after so many failed attempts at fraud.
Nicholas Rodriguez
what will you say when tomorrow 500 other dudes register copyright on bitcoin all claiming to be satoshi nakamoto?
Jeremiah Young
It's preposterous to think it would make a difference even if Craig COULD sign, which he can't. But if he could, Bitcoin would still be bitcoin. Nobody would market dump BTC for SV, no miners would switch to BCHSV, nothing would happen. SV would still be a third-tier.
But it's irrelevant because he can't sign anyway
Jayden Kelly
Imagine being so unimaginative and easily led that you unironically believe that not signing publicly is a 100% guarantee that he is not Satoshi.
This shit is going to be written about and dissected for years when everything starts to finally come out.
Zachary Campbell
Nobody else has so far. Do it yourself and prove all the "drooling idiots" wrong, faggot.
>The identity of Satoshi Nakamoto doesn't matter
Peak delusion/cope
Dylan Myers
>Nobody else has so far
Some hawaiian guy did
Mason Phillips
James Flores
How come if you search is Craig satoshi the first article is the coindesk one claiming the US copyright office did not recognize him as satoshi
Andrew Cook
Why would it matter? The BTC that follows the original whitepaper is BTC, that's why it's BTC. For a decade it has never mattered who wrote the whitepaper or the code. And it is not going to suddenly start to matter if we were to somehow learn who it was.
Joshua Lee
That’s not how this works.
Julian Ortiz
Nothing? Whether he signs or not has no impact on whether the created Bitcoin. Possession of keys is not proof of creation. Take a logic course sometime.
Luis Richardson
Craig is a good man. I know kikes hate godly men, but that is even more confirmation why you must be defeated.
Isaac Gomez
The real question is what will you do when he doesn't & BSV makes its last spin around the toilet (not that you've ever used one)
stopcraigwright.com
Adrian Morales
You are welcome to try. Good luck trying to dispute that in a courtroom.
Zachary Williams
satoshi mined the first block, so he must be the owner of the first adresse, ofc he doesnt proof 100% since he could have aquired it somehow which is ver unlikely
Adam White
So you admit that simple possession is not proof of anything? You can be in possession of keys that do not belong to you, through theft, lending, etc.
Signing is not proof that he created Bitcoin, I don't understand why you think it means anything.
Hudson Wright
One thing I don't understand is, in this free market, given that 99.9% of people in this space agree that the true Bitcoin is BTC, what do we care what Craig thinks? Why would it be any different if he was Satoshi? It just seems more likely that the entire market would just shrug and go on as before. I see no reason why anything would change, especially since it is in the best interest of everyone that status quo is preserved (except BSV cucks, of course)
Josiah King
so CSW would have stolen the key from Satoshi? i think that's unlikely. that's all. whoever signs genesis is very likely satoshi
Wyatt Reyes
Top bloke! What a lovely man.
Cameron Diaz
When BSV finally gets the BTC ticker. O what a glorious day it shall be. Kind of bittersweet cause BSV is pure kino. But I know it's destiny is to be the one and only Bitcoin (BTC).
Gavin Thompson
You know they're coming for that Bitcoin logo and ticker corecucks.
Julian Fisher
Read again
>lending
That is to say he could have the keys locked in trust. I wonder what he would call such a thing...
Jaxson Williams
That something is likely or a possibility is not proof. This method even fails to meet your own standard of evidence. You should be asking him to prove it in a court of law, which is legally binding.
Ryder Reyes
Nobody cares who satoshi is. That was the plan from the beginning.
Camden Martinez
>doesn't own bitcoin
Enjoy being poor
Jordan Allen
The prevalence and length of CSW threads here over the last month suggests otherwise
Ethan White
We don't want or need their tainted exchange ticker BTC. It represents failure, fraud, subversion, sabotage and deceit. It's useless.
Going forward it will simply be Bitcoin (BSV)
Asher Russell
New shill narrative being formed now that they can no longer deny he is Satoshi. It's all so predictable.
Kevin Sanders
>Nobody else has so far.
this is what i don't get i would have expected the frenzy to start already.
Owen Miller
not an argument
Logan Stewart
he actually copyrighted bitcoin cash
Eli Turner
it's all about likelihood, do you think people are sentencted for being a murderer only if there is 100% proof they did it?
Gavin Parker
shitcoins shouldn't mess with the king
Lucas Campbell
I'll deny Cuck Suckdick Wright is anything more than a dumpster hobo who stole everything he has from better men. He is not Satoshi, nor would I believe he is even if he signed genesis blocks (which he wont).
He's a cum guzzling con-man
Nathaniel King
This is a great gif. I especially like how the bitcoin "B" is not tilted, so you know unequivocally which SHA256 bockchain is the king.
Robert Lewis
it's the 2010 pander logo of btc don't get your hopes up shitcoiner
Lucas Myers
Julian Kelly
>What will you do when he doesn't eventually sign?
Where the fuck is everyone getting the idea hes signing eom?
Samuel Collins
Cope
David Bell
>nor would I believe he is even if he signed genesis blocks
>reeeee why won't he sign
Leo Thompson
There are 1000 other things that establish likelihood that you could look at if that is your standard of evidence. Read his medium articles, read the court documents, listen to knowledgeable people who watched him sign (Gavin, Grigg, Matonis), look into the tulip trust, question how the fuck he became a billionaire in the first place, etc etc.
Don't be an NPC.
Chase Brooks
>nor would I believe he is even if he signed genesis blocks (which he wont)
There it is folks.
Connor Foster
Exactly all the anti-CSW propaganda and online tarring and feathering are designed EXACTLY to prevent people from looking up all those primary sources you listed. It's an intellectual firewall erected by figurative kikes.
Adam Collins
lots of bla bla bla for saying NO, i wont sign.
Isaiah Gonzalez
wtf I want to choke on his cock and swallow his cum now!
Cameron Cruz
>lots of bla bla bla for saying NO, i wont sign.
Xavier Rogers
>l-loOK AT THE DOCUMENTS
>S-SIGN THE KEYS? H-H-HAA HA SHUT UP FAGGOT
>LOOK AT HIS BLOG
>oh he retroactively edited the blog? NO HE DIDNT FUCK YOU
pic related, its you
Zachary Butler
>I POSTED THE ANGRY S_Y FACE AGAIN MA
Jaxson Cooper
I honestly can't decide if either
>a large portion of Jow Forums is larping as bsv shills for luls. I must admit it's tempting to cheer for Craig, knowing all the time he's a fraud
>a large portion of Jow Forums are retards who think CSW is anything except a fraud who got into BTC in 2013 and has been trying (successfully) to make bank off the Satoshi name ever since
Christopher Sanders
(You) #
>I POSTED THE ANGRY S_Y FACE AGAIN MA
Asher Martinez
>fuck its not working, lemme post the second one I post in every thread
Ethan Martin
>fuck its not working, lemme post the second one I post in every thread
Isaiah Evans
You guys are children. How are either of you ever expected to get laid?
Colton Wilson
We can read the addresses of the tulip trust from court documents, and someone signed a message proving to the world that CSW is a fraud. End of story.
Josiah Hughes
This is exactly what a charlatan trying to maintain a scam would write. "I won't sign because game theory".
If he was satoshi, he would simply provide detailed and corroborated records of his work developing BTC, and he would sign
Christian Jackson
How can the most used-car salesman face in the history of the world be so good at what he does that he gets random people on the internet to defend his reputation for free? Oh right, those random people put their life savings into his spinoff fork shitcoin and so theyre grasping at the straws trying to defend their dwindling dollars.
Anthony Morris
* bsv slowly bleed to zero, craig followers organize a mass suicide *
Tyler James
>craig takes their bags and when he owns majority hashpower, he fake signs with satoshi key on his own fork
>SEE GUYS LOOK I SIGNED, I'M SATOSHI
Hudson Butler
Its going to be so satisfying when this backfires and Craig ends up in prison, tanking BSV immediately bitconnect style. Bitcoin isnt going anywhere, no exchanges are pulling it down, BSV however is. Binance did pull it down. Youre going to lose everything and its going to be so satisfying to watch.Like if Bitconnect were a good thing.
Cryptocurrency is disruptive, thats one of its main use cases. Wright is a shill for feds and Jew bankers, just like Garlinghouse and Ripple. Youre fed shills.
Logan Roberts
>$0.30 has been deposited into your Blockstream employee wallet for this comment.
Noah Morris
Brainlet.
Jayden Clark
>So, over the coming days, I will be posting a series of pieces that will lay the foundations for this extraordinary claim, posting independently-verifiable documents and evidence addressing some of the false allegations that have been levelled, ***and transferring Bitcoin from an early block.***
'The coming days' were over 3 years ago. How many more years can this fantasist spin his bullshit ?
Quote from: web.archive.org
Nicholas Gray
>Craig is a fed shill Jew banker
>Craig is going to prison
Bot malfunction LOL. Please consult your nearest blockstream employee for the latest talking points. This is your final warning.
Brayden Morris
Get married
Sebastian Howard
>13836503
>16 posts
Holy the delusion causes desperation. This is pitiful, are all bsv bagholders like this?
Owen Morgan
>This is pitiful, are all bsv bagholders like this?
without cope they would lose heir last vestiges of sanity
Isaiah Rodriguez
he has no problem saying he's satoshi but cant produce a simple signing key to prove it.
Juan Green
I already explained it, but you are too low IQ to understand simple logic. Signing with a key does not prove you created the system.
Tyler Hill
Its more credible than acting like a child on twitter at the least.
Brayden Wood
Yea but the latter produces more salt.
Owen Nguyen
>He doesn't know where the court docs came from
Shoo, shoo low information brainlet. This space is reserved for people who are at least passingly familiar with the relevant facts, only.
Mason Parker
Cameron Nelson
Yes
Easton Jackson
This is you
Jacob Russell
Those documents were supplied by The Criminal Investigations Dept. of the Australian Tax Authorities, where CSW is believed to be facing further criminal charges. The documents were supplied to them by CSW himself in connection with (yet another) fraud investigation. The documents were forwarded to Ira Kleiman in connection with his US case against CSW. CSW NOW claims these documents are forged, multiple years after they were initially provided to ATO and more than a year after they were filed in the US case. He claims they are now forged as a message was signed on one of the keys use, stating 'CSW is a fraud'. What is your point, again? Oh. You don't have one
Jaxon Watson
Point is you're wrong about
>The documents were supplied to them by CSW himself in connection with (yet another) fraud investigation.
And a lot of the other bullshit you posted, but mostly that one line. The documents were produced as part of the discovery process from a pool of data spanning dozens of machines which were owned by one of Craig's early companies and operated by his former employees, some of whom had a grudge against him.
Lurk moar: medium.com
The scanned doc itself is also obviously altered if you look at it with a discerning eye.
Thomas Martin
>doc itself is also obviously altered
but of course. It was also 'employees with a grudge' who signed Dave Kleimans name with ComicSans.ttf on the asset transfer docs, I presume ?
Andrew Adams
I'll wager one bsv to one btc in a months time. Put your money where your mouth is.