both bch and bsv?
Bitcoin maximalists
Leo Nguyen
Caleb Rodriguez
Public perception will have to mature significantly before adoption of many new alt tech will be feasible. So many alts that were developed back in 2015-17 have not adapted to new advancements in blockchain tech and solidified themselves in 2019 as PND scams for gullible but well meaning enthusiasts
Leo Rodriguez
McNormack
Christian Thompson
Based
Grayson Allen
It’s pretty simple. Big money only wants to deal with 12+ digit markets.
Josiah Diaz
Don't work. If you're willing to settle for a platform that doesn't work doge is better.
Sebastian Rogers
based
Lincoln Price
you don't understand any of the terms you posted, because you posted the exact same thing under several names.
Btc is hopelessly behind. There are standards getting set among modern blockchains, eg. everyone wants to use the exact same BLS signature scheme to have compatibility. Bitcoin isn't even in the discussion.
Bitcoin has zero hope of ever getting trustless sidechains.
>Segwit
That's not an innovation, that's a hack to implement changes without a hard fork.
>Schnorr
As the name implies, it's a signature scheme invented by a guy named Schnorr. It's in fact older than ECDSA, but couldn't be used for years because of patents. Not an innovation by bitcoin devs.
>Lightning
failed idea, the guy that invented it works on plasma now.
>MAST
>-dlog contracts
Same thing. Rejected back in 2011 along with OP_EVAL, can be easily implemented on ethereum, not actually practical.
>Taproot/Graftroot
Another thing that can be already done on ethereum, but needs a fork on bitcoin because of primitive script. Like segwit, only needed because of bitcoin's limitations. Its only actual function on bitcoin would be to make LN channel transactions smaller, but it's marketed as "smart contracts" to brainlets.
>- Sidechains
>- Liquid
>- RSK
>- Drivechain
those are all centralized sidechains.
>-channel factories
Same category as taproof and segwit, a fake innovation only needed to combat bitcoin deficiencies.
>-signature aggregation
Which is already interactively possible, schnorr only makes it easier. BLS signatures allow non-interactive aggregation, but that's happening on ethereum.
>-sharding through sortition chains
I can't find anything about it, but without PoS decentralized sharding is impossible. Must be another centralized solution like rsk.
>-utrexo
A copy of eth2.0 stateless design. It's never going to happen.
>eltoo
Another fake innovation that's only working around the deficiency: bitcoin has no state so it's extremely hard to make anything that needs it.
Hot air.
Daniel Price
>without PoS decentralized sharding is impossible
i think so too but pos is a potential death trap that can forever end a chain
Justin Taylor
BTC is a shitcoin. There's nothing wrong with Bitcoin Maximalism otherwise.