Cut down 500+ year old trees solely for profit

>cut down 500+ year old trees solely for profit
>sell it to build some trivial shit that will probably be in a landfill in 50 years

Ancaps will defend this.

Attached: 1-busenbark_park_eatherington10-15.jpg (480x360, 139K)

Other urls found in this thread:

scientificamerican.com/article/old-growth-forests-help-combat-climate-change/
science.time.com/2014/01/15/study-shows-older-trees-absorb-more-carbon/
ecowatch.com/importance-of-old-growth-forests-carbon-capture-potential-grows-with-a-1881849523.html
youtu.be/IBe-4GSAIP4
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>mad
>at wood

>It's old so it's good

Attached: 1450888998171.png (1585x1527, 101K)

How does a tree being old increase its value to the point that harvesting it is a bad idea? Because it's "cool" for a tree to be old?
Or is it that you think there is something to be learned from these old plants that we don't already know about them

Cut down massive tree hogging all the resources, create more biodiversity. I figured you commies would get that?
Plant replacement trees, make more money and keep forest healthy.

GET THE FUCK OFF MY BOARD AND GO DRAW YOUR PROTESTS ON A CAVE WALL WITH YOUR OWN PISS YOU FUCKING HIPPIE.

Yeah who cares about natural heritage n sheeit.
Also race is just a construct, why should it matter if the 10,000+ years of genetic and cultural heritage of the european race gets destroyed. old != good, right?

Literally yes

Niggerbrain.

That tree was culture
F