Cut down 500+ year old trees solely for profit

>cut down 500+ year old trees solely for profit
>sell it to build some trivial shit that will probably be in a landfill in 50 years

Ancaps will defend this.

Attached: 1-busenbark_park_eatherington10-15.jpg (480x360, 139K)

Other urls found in this thread:

scientificamerican.com/article/old-growth-forests-help-combat-climate-change/
science.time.com/2014/01/15/study-shows-older-trees-absorb-more-carbon/
ecowatch.com/importance-of-old-growth-forests-carbon-capture-potential-grows-with-a-1881849523.html
youtu.be/IBe-4GSAIP4
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>mad
>at wood

>It's old so it's good

Attached: 1450888998171.png (1585x1527, 101K)

How does a tree being old increase its value to the point that harvesting it is a bad idea? Because it's "cool" for a tree to be old?
Or is it that you think there is something to be learned from these old plants that we don't already know about them

Cut down massive tree hogging all the resources, create more biodiversity. I figured you commies would get that?
Plant replacement trees, make more money and keep forest healthy.

GET THE FUCK OFF MY BOARD AND GO DRAW YOUR PROTESTS ON A CAVE WALL WITH YOUR OWN PISS YOU FUCKING HIPPIE.

Yeah who cares about natural heritage n sheeit.
Also race is just a construct, why should it matter if the 10,000+ years of genetic and cultural heritage of the european race gets destroyed. old != good, right?

Literally yes

Niggerbrain.

That tree was culture
F

Timber comes from commercial forests

Trees like this are cut down to clear land

Don't worry, i bet Apple or someone else will come up with a new butt wiping app so you can wipe your ass with your smartphone.

In France there was a farmer/hillbilly who litterally shot at workers who went to cut old trees in front of his home, because it was his landscape since he was born. I respect that.
(he was trialed but the trees are still there)

old growth forests are vital for proper CO2 absorption, kike

bunch of trees != a forest

these replanted "forests" are nothing more than glorified tree farms.

The type of stupidity Oregonoids like OP are capable of is limitless.
It is illegal to pump your own gas there, so no Oregonoids are capable of pumping their own gas out of state.

Total bullshit.
New growth is far more dense an efficient.

I would kill you irl

>finding retarded examples to strawman ancaps with
Literally why. Ancaps aren't even a threat to anyone or thing.

Friendly reminder that there's more forested land in the US today than there was a century ago.

Wood is a vital resource, and logging practices these days are sustainable. Cry moar, faggot.

>destroy 90+% of US forests
>cant even leave a few fucking old trees alone
you greedy jews deserve to be shot

Attached: 1506831843868.png (808x805, 446K)

>destroy 90+% of US forests
what?

total bullshit. simply saying things does not make them true

scientificamerican.com/article/old-growth-forests-help-combat-climate-change/

science.time.com/2014/01/15/study-shows-older-trees-absorb-more-carbon/

ecowatch.com/importance-of-old-growth-forests-carbon-capture-potential-grows-with-a-1881849523.html

Nope. In 100 years maybe.

>destroy 90% of forest.
That stat reeks because you just pulled it out of your ass.
We left plenty of old growth in massive parks. Get out of your mum's basement and go visit one.
That gadget you are shitposting on was made with products produced by oil drilling, mining, and logging, you
DUMB MOTHERFUCKER.

"""""forested land"""""

Attached: virgin_forest1620-1926.jpg (1248x1608, 372K)

He just cognitive dissonanced himself into believing that, otherwise his whole line of thought wouldn't make sense.

Wow powerful reddit yes we won

>Since 1600, 90% of the virgin forests that once covered much of the lower 48 states have been cleared away. Most of the remaining old-growth forests in the lower 48 states and Alaska are on public lands. In the Pacific Northwest about 80% of this forestland is slated for logging.

Attached: defores9.jpg (288x526, 100K)

ancaps are fucking retarded.

Only Anarchy without (((money))) will ever actually work to everyones benefit
youtu.be/IBe-4GSAIP4

A 20 year old forest is at optimal for photosynthesis.
After that, it begins to decline. Old Growth forest are a waste of space.

dumb Oregonoids saying facts n sheeit

wrong

see

Non Virgin forest is not barren land, and more efficient at CO2 consumtion and O2 production.
You;
BTFO

>ebil pinko hippie gubmint stoppin' us decent workin' folk from makin' a livin' for a bunch o' trees
>destroys his natural heritage and turns his country into an ugly black industrial dystopia
based conservatives, trump has my vote

>shitposts about my work using technology I produced
yep, Hildawg / Bernie got my vote.

these fags aren’t conservatives. they’re self-serving consumerists as a result of Jewish brainwashing a la (((Bernays))) and (((Rand)))

pls respond

ALL YOU FUCKING HIPPIES BETTER SHUT OFF YOUR DEVICES! THEY ARE SPEWING CARBON!!!

>moving the goalpost and a strawman
Try again kike.

Fucking hypocrite faggots.

why are you ignoring this?

You dont you go back to destroying culture you dumb kike

>ecowatch
>scientificamerican
Please quote non conflicted credible sources if you are going to.

Clearcutting isn't ideal, but it's not like those areas don't get replanted. It is probably the worst way to go about harvesting lumber in terms of environment.

Ideally, trees should be farmed like the birch trees of the east coast: selective cutting, in the same way we have selective fishing. Only trees that are viable should be cut. It hurts the profits of the lumber companies, but it's well worth the effort in avoiding ecological disasters.

Attached: 1523216920303.gif (389x413, 1.83M)

my footprint is definitely lower than you savages

they have links to studies on the articles

try again, shlomo

Hippies like you are a product of Kikes.
Mining Logging, and Drilling Nazis like myself are a product of Adolf.
Gas yourself.

you are a jew

No you economical niggers, we would simply relocate it with roots intact to be a touristic sight, charging 1 buck for each visitor, thus protecting nature and profiting at the same time.

You dare to speak commie ?! you destroyed nature to a degree that even most capitalist man wouldn'T dare. Volga river was famously dangerous to be smoking near because "it might set ablaze because of all the industrial waste in it"

Attached: ThinkThrough.jpg (225x224, 34K)

Agreed, but I think the big question is whether people can do it by moral fortitude alone, and without regulations? I tend to think not

Don't you have a 9 year old Serb to rape?

No, a forest isn't only the big trees but also all the vegetation that comes along, the soil, the wildlife etc.It has to be the biggest possible and untouched to reach the max efficiency.

el boomer eterno.

Tree farming is fine with me. I just don't get these greedy kikes and their insatiable desire to destroy the remaining

How was Porkfest guys? Did you let your kids sleep over with the transgender anarchist that looks like a balding Ozzy Osbourne? How was the black keynote speaker?

>plant 2 new trees in its place
>???
>profit

AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH

Attached: pepe murderous.jpg (403x392, 40K)

More cover for wildlife in new forest, better soil retention, etc etc.

tree farms are aesthetically pleasing to me

Attached: boardman-tree-farm-166.jpg (790x469, 129K)

That i̶s̶ was a big tree.

>No you economical niggers, we would simply relocate it with roots intact to be a touristic sight, charging 1 buck for each visitor, thus protecting nature and profiting at the same time.
Or just cut it down, which is what generally happens because old growth wood is worth a lot of money, far more than you could earn operating a park over a reasonable span of time. There is no economic intensive NOT to clearcut all of it.

Attached: fails to understand.jpg (234x215, 16K)

>the only true criminal is someone whose every single action is a crime, otherwise we can't jail them
What a lazy ad absurdum, typical boomer. Can't wait until you die, will be a short few years

yeah you are clearly not well read. you havent even heard of "blood and soil"?

Ultra-capitalists and those who profiteer by destroying our world and our people get the bullet too

Attached: 1527098485935.jpg (750x926, 231K)

Old growth are carbon neutral, smooth brain. They're good to have around for habitat diversity though.

OK, Ill come right out and say it. You worthless sack of shit hippies killed 19 of my friends and destroyed my town.
You wouldn't let anyone use the land around Yarnel so it overgrew and choked itself, then burned in a firestorm.
You should all be shot.
Forest;
Use It or Lose It.

Obviously never worked as a logger. Old trees often need harvesting to prevent disease spread in the healthy young forest.

leftist time traveler, forgot what century he was in

here you go, jew brain

That's nothing, pic related. Madagascar will decimate its entire island within the next decades, all because its inhabitants are too primitive to grow sustainably (many areas don't even have electricity, and use 100kg/month of wood per family). Western nations raze the land, but it goes much further and isn't completely wasted. But in shitholes like this and Brazil, they not only irreversibly damaged their own land, but do so by getting literally nothing out of it with no oversight for the future.

Irresponsible countries be forced to cease control of their natural resources to superior countries like America and Canada. Prove me wrong.

Attached: 1527806352753.png (624x199, 210K)

t.never been out of the city

The big problem with farming is the supply at this point. The Chinese and other asian countries are obsessed with the lumber from the Americas, driving up demand to ridiculous levels. Change the demand and the supply adjusts as such.

good thing trees are renewable.

Attached: smart.png (296x303, 195K)

It is a picture of commercial forest dumbass

every tree is special, kek

Are you gay? I'm not about to go shill for niggers but they are using that wood to SURVIVE while we're doing it to make the couture couch that Jessica really likes. Don't act and flip it around as if we have the moral high ground here we definitely do not.

>500+ yo
>important
Must feel weird living in a country whose history is so short that 500yo stuff is considered precious.

They're parasites, and their survival is futile because decades later their society and standard of living hasn't developed. Yes, consumerism is an issue in Western nations, but that's a whole other issue altogether.

If you care so much for the trees then buy them all and keep them from being destroied. Nobody cares about your feelings.People's egoism is the driven motor that putted the humanity on its most confortable era ever

>we

Attached: borneo-deforestation-palm-oil.jpg (1600x1016, 1.68M)

Also not sure if anyone is aware, but trees grow back. Seen it happen myself. I cleared a field, grew a crop, abandoned that field, then 15 years later there was a forest there....

planting all the same species is bad, if one catches fire they'll all catch fire

must feel weird living in a country full of fags

Beautiful. Man creates

TELL THEM YOU ARE SORRY YOU KILLED THEIR HUSBANDS AND FATHERS OF THEIR CHILDREN YOU ECOTERRORIST FAGGOT HIPPIES.

SAY IT!
ITS TIME WE STARTED HANGING HIPPIES.

Attached: 20180616_153137.png (471x660, 431K)

An older tree can produce up to 6x more o2 than a younger (less than 50) tree. After 150 the changes are negligable.

>the virgin forest
>the chad plantation