Whenever I argue with a shitlib about non-Eureopean immigration they say that actually migrants commit less crimes than the natives and I'm just a "Ignorant racist who likes to spread fear and hate".
Now, this can't be right. How can people comming from the third world, where violence is very common, commit less crimes than 1st worlders?
When they say that, they are talking about America.
Legal, and even illegal immigrants into America commit less crime (aside from the illegal immigration...) than the native population.
However, because America is full of black people, the "native crime rate" is inflated.
If you split it by race instead, you'll find exactly what you expect: Asians commit less crime than Whites commit less crime than Hispanics commit less crime than Blacks.
By absolute numbers they are right, from a proportional pov they are wrong. Have luck finding a libtard who undertsand the concept of proportionality
Violence isn't that common in the third world among refugees, its' ISIS who give them a bad name
Crime Rates = REPORTED crime
Can't make the crime rate go up if we don't consider it a crime anymore.
I dont believe this for a second
They probably just don't bother following up on like 90% of crime reports
*tap tap*
Sensationalism. I mean look at OPs picture still referring to crimes that occurred in 2015/2016, meanwhile there have probably been hundreds of native-on-native rapes/groping incidents but none so widely covered as the "rapefugees" in Cologne.
Then you have retards like this guy, doesnt matter what gets reported they have an autistic and insurmountable fear of refugees.
Rape from migrants aren't a crime.