YOU LET THIS HAPPEN

This isn't about net neutrality. You have a data cap plan.

>social networks are computer networks
The (((social networks))) happen to be concentration and distribution points for user traffic, and they just happen to be running on computers. No judaism there, just the facts of the matter. Were those concentration points owned by a government, they would be subject to the protections of the 1A and so on.
>I
Randian brain-damage located
>start a private company that exists to network computers as per various agreements with various private entities the feds shouldn't have a right to eviscerate it into oblivion by abusing regulations
Sure, there's no reason you can't make your own SWIFT or EDI or other niche network using the same Internet protocols developed with public dollars over leased lines, but
- you're also not entitled to not have the government competing with you on quality and price of service
- the value-add of your network derives entirely from its exclusivity
so it may not be such an "earner" for you.

you're that same retard who wanted to argue about an AI controlled eugenics program, aren't you?

Afraid not.

>Is your condescending, babby-tier argument that everything is metered and non-perishable, therefore, everything should be metered and non-perishable?
I see your problem. You have strawman'd my argument in your mind and responded to claims I did not make. I used these examples to attack the improper outrage against metered Internet by demonstrating that many things are already metered, and that this system does function. I never claimed that this SHOULD be so, simply because it IS. That's another argument entirely.

>Yet, it is not at all hard to conceive of methods of resource allocation that do not involve a single coinbox or a single jew. You should get out of the US more.
You use fancy "newspeak" words like "resource allocation" in what I believe is an attempt to suggest that some things (perhaps everything) should be "free" for everyone. I believe thisnis born from cognitivebdissonance, and is an attempt to dodge admitting the fact that work must be done by someone, even if such work is not directly done by the end user himself.

1/2

Attached: Free_Lunch_No_Such_Thing_TANSTAAFL.jpg (600x700, 81K)

If a worker provides a service, they must be compensated for their work, else they are a slave. The most direct method of compensation is for the end user to pay the worker for their work at a per-unit rate. This cannot be avoided by complicating the process in funneling such payments through bureaucracy (whether public or private), though there is an argument to be had about whether public or private bureaucracy is a necessary evil in this process (aiding/hindering efficiency).

I do tend to favor eliminating as many "middle men" as possible (both public AND private) to minimize the amount of payment being siphoned by bureaucrats of all kinds, allowing the worker to most directly and completely reap the full benefit of their own labor. That being said, some (small!) amount of bureaucracy can tend to maximize this worker benefit by facilitating the process of transferring goods in return for compensation. This logistical specialization can play a useful and beneficial role, and the only argument seems to be in how, exactly, to apply this principle in practice.

2/2

That plan in the OP is $12/gig or $45/unlimited.

That is certainly an inefficiency. It seems a floating rate, based on a ratio of bandwidth used vs bandwidth available, may be in order.

>pic related

regardless yes there is, because as you good and god damn well know under the Ajit "Run the FCC to slide into those DMs so EZZ" "Life of Pi" governance pro-trust regulatory actions have been taken against small-market ISPs that barely clung to life during the Obama admin. Stop pretending that the government and corps aren't salivating at the idea of turning this shit into a public utility to completely crush any free-market. You want Australian-teir internet? Turn it into a public utility and the union-bureau incest will make us lucky if we get a packet a month.

Attached: giggadoubt.jpg (677x1024, 58K)

But how. I pay around 20eur a month for unlimited 4g data.