unfortunately correct, liberty can only be asserted among the virtuous
Why does everyone hate libertarians?
>making abortions illegal
Libertarians don't want to make things illegal just because they are bad. That's not how you solve the vast majority of cultural issues. Libertarians employ darwinistic social policies, for the most part. If the government didn't give out welfare and free shit to all the social rejects then they wouldn't breed at the rate that they do currently. And as society progresses, people become better because the ones reproducing are the ones that are smart enough to have a family and raise children to prosper.
tl:dr society improves itself, fuck off statist
You fuckers are the ones who will get our nations overrun with 3rd worlders because you either 1. won't fight to protect your lands because "who needs goverment and shit?" AND/OR 2. want to import as many 3rd world slaves as you can to make more profits off of because you hate your own race and won't pay their price. People like you are the reason liberals got so much power in the first place with your autistic hissy fit when Obabo got elected and you decided you didn't want your country instead of fighting for it.
>free market will self correct
No, not at all. It requires strong men. Otherwise the society will die no matter the economics. Strong men are created by struggle, if libertarianism creates wealth without death and struggle, actual physical struggle between men via war, then society will fall.
Libertarianism must have an agrarian basis (we live in the age of cities) or a basis in industrialized warfare (we live in an age of relative peace).
There is no way to breed strong men.
Also companies are basically communism except with money as a representation of labor as opposed to a social communal representation of labor.
The alternative is being less dramatic. If you believe that picture you are so far removed from reality you might as well be living on a different turtle.
Societal cohesion is a nothing waved around by nationalists to explain why we would be better off if we kicked everyone who disagreed with them out of the country.
Define it for me. Give me some stats. Show me how it improves quality of life in any measurable way.
also, the amazon rainforest is slowly being privatized.
nice, try.
>muh jews
Fuck off. You believe in a mass jewish conspiracy because jews are overwhelmingly represented at the top of heirarchies, yet you can't point to median IQ differences as a cause of this although you have no problem doing that with niggers. You're a moron
Because the free market doesn't fix it.
And because even the idea that an economic model will solve ethical or societal problems is absolutely fucking retarded.
ah, the libertarian reveals his final form.
classic.
Jewish higher average IQ doesn't account for the over representation alone. Nepotism and corruption do, though.
Oh do I love seeing this retarded argument from lolberts
>good regulations shouldn't exist
>because bad regulations exist
Better idea: Use good regulations, don't use bad ones. Holy shit.
>And you think the answer to this is more government?
No, the answer is good government, rather than corrupt or malevolent government, but certainly not no government.