THE BASIC EUGENIC TRUTH: Only the top percentile of genetic superiority should breed; deep down you know this is the only way to ensure that the species evolves to its biological apex. Which means that everyone else shouldn't have sex for the sake of procreation, and by extension shouldn't date for that purpose either. I'm intentionally not giving specifics of how superiority is defined, because the general concept holds true regardless of how you define superiority or inferiority. It also holds true regardless of what counts as the "top percentile".
Your difficulty in accepting the basic eugenic truth stems from cultural brainwashing about what society should value and how it should be organized. If we follow this basic eugenic truth, here are some basic changes society should make to adjust:
1) You are not a better person if you happen to be born with superior genetics; and are thus are entrusted with breeding rights, it's a job, just like plumber or electrician. If we collectively value people with families as superior, we incentivize genetically lesser people to breed just to try to capture moral status. It's just a job.
2) You should be free to breed, but choose not to. One of the major issues is "how do you enforce this without totalitarianism?". The answer is individual choice and social pressure. Only people with good genetics should breed, and if you have crappy genetics, you need to voluntarily opt out. We need to instill cultural shaming for any lesser people of lesser genetics who procreate.
3) No you don't exterminate or abort the lessers or force sterilize. There is no need for this if everyone just takes the eugenics pill, if we all wake up to the genetic reality of your breed direction. You must seperate eugenics from dictatorship in your mind, one is a scientific fact that can be voluntarily accepted, the other is a political system that is inherently violently imposed.
>thinks he has a point >doesn't In the trash you and your opinion go, mutt.
Logan Bennett
Well I'm gonna fuck either way you deluded autist
Carson Hughes
Lol. What makes racist, sexist bigots like 99% of this website's visitors that they are part of the "top percentile of genetic superiority"? Face it, you're definitely not as smart as you think you are, and are most certainly not worthier than anyone else because you go on a bigoted cesspool of a website to post hate speech.
Nathan Diaz
>slavs have low IQs Yet western europeans are the ones stupid enough to fall for (((liberalism))) and their own genetic genocide
A species with less genetic variety is easier to wipe out, by disease or dramatic changes to the environment. Diversity in the gene pool allows for certain individual traits to survive whatever situation nature can throw at a species.
Humans may no longer live around nature but we're still vulnerable to disease or environmental influences.
To limit the gene pool to only be made of what we deem a "superior race" is ignorant and unnecessary.
Nature is the ultimate decider of who gets to live or die.
Dominic Barnes
I am a voluntary celibate with several debilitating heritable disorders, and I am a strident eugenicist because I do not want to weaken the next generation by passing on my faulty genetics. It's unfortunate, because my genes are otherwise in the top fifth percentile, but that doesn't outweigh the negatives.
Nolan White
Lol faggot
Blake Wood
underrated post. Are the two end paths for each side supposed to imply mutual exclusivity?
David Anderson
Well you can still breed, just use someone else's sperm. That's what I'm going to do. My genes are not good and I fear that any child I have will turn out nuts or dumb.
Long term I think families should be replaced with mass reproduction. Females would be paid to have children (using sperm from superlative males), and children would be raised in special communities built just for them. These communities could vary in size from a small town to a large city or county or even an entire state. And they would be run by women because of their nurturing nature.
So under such a system, adults, not needing to creating a family, would have a lot more money, and a lot more free time. Traditional families waste a lot of resources and cause a lot of stress and grief and are not the best option for children, because parents are often poor, stupid, erratic, selfish, drug abusers, and do not put any thought into reproduction.
Christian Edwards
Neanderthal and Modern Man existed at the same time.
Elijah Wilson
Faggots were a mistake
Cameron Powell
What we should be seeking is the process of speciation the different races in order to increase the genetic diversity of humanity. Of course, this would mean an end to the current globalist project of universal race-mixing, so it won't happen until we topple them and install bio-political governments
Austin Lewis
>I'm intentionally not giving specifics of how superiority is defined Because it's extremely fluid lmao. Let's have a simplest example that there's some pretty fag whom all bitches like and consider superior. But the I and my buddy, people whom bitches dont like, team up, ambush and kill aforementioned pretty fag, beat his bitches into submission and rape them until they like it. Genes responsible for attractive look and what average person tend to consider superior are lost in this case, and genes responsible for capability of both violence and teamwork that results in mutual benefit have been spread further. Is that eugenic? Nobody will be able to say for sure.
Isaiah Green
>Implying I think I'm worthy of spreading my genes.
Dude I'm not having kids for just that reason. But I'll support the ethnostate because if in fact reincarnation is real I'd like to come back a white man
Josiah Gomez
??? humans are still evolving. we should seek to replace all humans on earth with newer and better human breeds with better dna code. sperm-based hybridization is the way to do this. Distribute sperm with the upgraded human dna code, and pay people to use it. we should start with selective breeding of humans to improve the dna code, and then maybe in 100 years we'll be able to genetically modify the code directly to produce better traits.
Isaiah Morales
I'm with your brother
Josiah Brown
>your you
Adam Gonzalez
Would be nice but it will never happen. Higher chance is that babies will be GM"d in the future.
Asher Russell
Utopian bullshit. People will never accept it, the biological imperative outweighs everything else.
Noah Cox
low IQ countries are hell on earth.
It should be considered a civic duty to produce intelligent offspring. it is also a matter of national security.
Sebastian Cruz
Moron. You think you're going to do anything by not breeding? Ten million niggers will be born by the time this thread 404s
