Why did no NA civilization emerge? What makes NA so different from Europe or China?
>natives of asian heritage with high IQ genes
>lots of resources and animals
>seasons, different climates require adaption
>huge land where population can live in seperated regions and evolve into different cultures, resulting in competing city states, empires etc.
Other urls found in this thread:
m.youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Nomadism.
Amerindians are a low IQ branch of asian mongoloids.
no jews or niggers = peak collectivism
meme flags just detract your point.
opinion discarded.
They were simple men.
There are people on here that would argue against this.
>no NA civilization
Lrn2chaco-culture Hans
Because "native americans are nigger-tier
>le meme flag non argument
Yawn.
Let him be retarded.
And your image macro is lmao.
Use dishonest flags expect dishonest shit responses typical nigger
All these words for just hiding the fact that you have no argument. Sad!
Nope, even West African negroids had better civilizations than North American Indians.
m.youtube.com
America is dying.
Is that really too many words for you? You must be really dumb.
Eurasia is East to West and thus has a larger fertile zone. Allowing for trade of ideas etc. They also killed off horses and lacked cows.
>When white man find land, Indians running it, no taxes, no debt, plenty buffalo, plenty beaver, clean water. Women did all the work, Medicine Man free. Indian man spend all day hunting and fishing; all night having sex. Only white man dumb enough to think he could improve system like that.
not even close Tanner. you couldnt enslave us. and you brought the niggers here. that was a nigger move
Pretty low to be below niggers
>nigs had better civ-
>Is that really too many words for you? You must be really dumb.
As opposed to the guy acting all butthurt over a little pixel flag, right?
>natives of asian heritage with high IQ genes
Siberians are almost as dumb as niggers, bruh.
>butthurt
go to Jow Forums if you like state flags so much, fag
*brofist*
>>lots of resources and animals
It's literally this. The Americas have a majority of the world's arable lands and hunting grounds. There's no need for steal when the ground gives way to wood.
one thing whites and niggers have in common is NO PYRAMIDS
I'm just stating a fact. People hide flags are typically niggers. So why entertain a conversation with them thats not showing the error of their ways. begone negro.
Nice way of saying that you can't argue against my argument. It's ok, I understand.
>a system like that
the 1st nations were in constant war with each other. Most of the men would die w/o getting to nob the women due to war and infighting.
This.
Conditions in Europe drove farming enhancements like the plow and winter survival culling. Tribal nomad cultures massively detract from homesteaders constantly refining techniques with failure leading to death.
No sufficient drop to create agrarian society rewriting to settle down, lack of some crucial innovations leading to further devolopment. SA was able to build such societies.
Thank you. But you're still a nigger.
see pic, whoa mind blowing
whoa, so rich.
Maybe lots of resources is the problem. People in Africa have literally abundant wealth of resources and they can't build a mud hut.
Wrong faggot there are pyramids in Armenia
Here are some factors that I could think of:
1. They settled notably later than most of the populations back in the Old World, as they needed time to travel TO the New World and ACROSS it.
2. My guess is, cultures evolve less rapidly and can store fewer memes if the population is nomadic AND if it's moving through harsh environment.
3. They were isolated from other cultures of the Old World (obviously). Being isolated is bad for cultural evolution.
In summary: NA's had less time and worse conditions for cultural evolution. Don't know about their average IQ, but if it's low, it's no help either.
Individuals in Africa are not the brightest, unfortunately. Allow any other ethnic group of individuals, even the Arabs or Indians, and Africa would likely flourish as a civilization.
Huh? Haiti is a place of descendants of the weaker Negroids of West Africa. The most strongest and smartest were the ones who sold them off. Go look up actual West African civilization
armenians are arab lol
Ted Kaczynski likes this post.
Armenians are West Asian, they are not Arab. If you ever call an Armenian arab they will beat you the hell up.
this is part of it
I'm going to list the reasons in no particular order
>abundant resources does not force evolution
>large land mass prevents overpopulation, henec continually abundant resources
>original inhabitants in europe did not used to be smart. they got conquered by the aryans, the inventors of the wheel, that also built megalithic civs in the levant, then, they became MORE intelligent over time in europe
>lack of 'gene introgression' that helped, in small amounts, to make europeans and asians smarter. e.g. over 10k years or so, small amounts of racial interbreeding of equally intelligent races DO make people more intelligent. but over 10k years. fucking a nigger is not going to make a smarter baby
>higher death rates in europe. death accelerates evolution
>european genetic isolation. europe, being smaller, makes it easier for smaller populations to become isolated, much like the galapagos finches
>more recent arrival in america, less time to evolve
there might be a couple things I left out. but this is probably 95% of it
Just adding to your point
The Mayans and Aztecs were pretty civilized for their time, you just don't hear much about them because
W
H
I
T
E
P
E
O
P
L
E
fucked them up pretty bad.
chinese trade contributed quite a bit to the industrial revolution, but very little to any preindustrial events, given that there had not been chinese contact much before
the silk road itself provided very little, hence the incentive for the spanish to discover a route to india
it certainly had NO relation to superior european genetic evolution
Without the Silk Road europeans would've never gained gunpowder or the technique for constructing paper.
didn't the spanish look for new routes to india because the not-so-friendly turks conquered the byzantine empire through which the silk road went to europe?
Catholic spain and Portugal gave central and south American tribes thier own countries, then American cia fbi freemansons fuged them up.
>this
If there ever was a succesful socialistic community that was it
Agree to disagree. We're talking about thousands of years in development. Sure euro's invented quite a bit but would still be living in the copper age with out the basics agriculture, tech, and resources to spur the revolution.
Eskimos are low iq retards
I bet you meet a lot of them in spain.
you THINK that, but do you really have any evidence of that?
before europeans even had guns they had already, in the DARK AGE, surpassed every other civilization in shipbuilding in EVERY aspect. building better ships is the thing that ENDED the dark age by retaking hte med from muslim pirates
saying that europeans could have never discovered guns or paper independently is like saying europe could have never discovered the atom, nuclear physics, the airplane, genetics, DNA, evolution, etc. independently
there are literally like, 4 or 5 really basic things that europe did not invent independently, and the idea that europe could have never invented the other 99% of modern science ift hey didn't have some particular arbitrary invention from____insert nigger here_____ is fucking ridiculous. you've internalized nigger arguments
Nah, thats not what they were saying it would just take way longer.
The continent is long North to South instead of East to West like Eurasia, which makes it very difficult for trade routes to exist. The silk road was a major factor in the spread of technology here. (even much before silk was a thing)
Was GLR an actual NatSoc or was he simply a European Identitarian who used symbolizm to get attention and supporters?
thats part of it. but access to silk didn't spur the enlightenment or end of the dark ages. the silk road provided very little in terms of tech, and only provided a little, at very high cost, in terms of commdities
direct access to china/india could fund armies and NOT fund bloodthirsty muslim savages doing so
finding a method AROUND the silk road is one of the big spurs of the enlightenment. NOT the slk road itself
big fuckin difference
>copper age
genetic europeans didn't even LIVE in europe in the copper age you lying nigger
that nigger, and I quote, literally said "never"
fuck off reddit
Why is your ego so fragile?
Also what makes you think "genetic" euro's didn't live in europe? Pretty sure anglos were living there 10's of thousands of years ago.
Africans are just dumb
They were given civilisation and they even fucked that up
You were savages before european arrive, now you're savage mutts
nigger tier take
china is an entirely north to south country, and they managed to build roads just fine. ALL of the largest premodern infrastructure projects are in china, and all of them other than the great all of china run north to south the length of america
if you have any books by jared ((((diamond)))) set it on fire and punch yourself in the balls
>reddit spaces
>tells others to go back. lmao, now you're just emotionally irrational. Maybe you should get your hormones checked, tranny.
It's not just the technology, it's the trade and the economic benefit it brings. Throughout history we've seen that trade and civilization are almost always synonyms.
But either way it's not just the silk road, it is the possibility for any one technology to spread from one area to another. We're talking about much earlier technologies than just gunpowder, like agriculture or animal husbandry. Great migrations from the east brought those innovations to Europe, for example.
and in Europe who best emerges? -------> kikes
>y do u think a fact hurr durr
literally read a book you idiot. genetically modern europeans didn't live in europe at that time. they lived around the steppes and russia
Pretty sure spainards dark secret is that the moors raped you to your swarmy curly hair.
You guys are basically negro hybrids ;)
No written language. Can't pass down or share knowledge without a written language. Shit gets forgotten through oral tradition.
They have higher denisovan DNA and are more primitive than those that stayed in Asia and got mixed with Cro Magnons. Only CroMags and Neanderthals had the spark of god and ability to create in them.
lol, now you don't reddit space. you're so goofy, my man.
where's espanol + moor?
because that's what you are
i miss him bros
lol high iq
>german education
You're the one that brought it up. Visit your local museum. I'm pretty sure they still have moor artifacts. and 1400's really wasn't that long ago lol
turk is asian in language and small in dna, armenian is full european
you're making vague claims. specify the migrations that brought "those great innovations"
pre-iron age tech other than the chariot has NO evidence of "diffusion" but instead spreads to areas that are conquered and repopulated. things like bronze are intensely sensitive to gigantic societal trade nets/supply chains, and do not simply "spread"
one of the things that makes the "iron age" such a big deal is that iron is relatively easy to manufacture in comparison, once its discovered
trade certainly plays some role. but europe discovered the renaissance in NEAR COMPLETE isolation. clearly trade didn't play that big of a role
Moors were majority Berber mostly actually. Although its not out of the realm of plausibly that some Spainiards in Iberia may have some Negro blood since the Berber states hired some West African mercenaries from time to time.. The only Negroes in muslim controlled Spain were either Eunuch (pagan) negroe haram guards or Muslim mercenary West Africans.. Maybe Hausa or Fulani
thing about meme flags faggot is that "certain people" use them to conceal who they really are so it's reasonable to expect suspicion when you use them
Which renaissance?
lol, China is an island now?
Armenians don't speak Turkish, they speak հայերեն. I said West Asian because their kingdom/place of origin is in West Asia. I never implied they are NOT caucasian though, but they are not European.
Shit
The indo-europeans, for instance, that domesticated the horse and invented the wheel? Yes, this was introduced through conquest, which was favored by the horizontal rather than vertical layout of the continents. If the hordes had had to cross a dense jungle through a narrow pass over thousands of kilometers they would have never invaded.
Now look at all the civilizations that we consider prosperous and how they all had a very broad trade network in common. Phoenicians, minoans, greeks, romans...
If you look at any berber or moor statue they look negro to me.
just google images it.
>we
>wuz
another moor statue
Armenians don't speak Turkish
i dont say that -_-
but seriously armenian is european brother is not asian, old country of armenian is turkish, is not caucase
geographically, china is very isolated. their racial purity is partly the result of a successful campaign of conscious racial purity and genocide, and partly the result of high levels of geographical isolation. outside of coastal china, there is mostly only vast mountain ranges, desert, and very poor soil. almost all of china lives 100 miles from the eastern coast
the chinese homeland is in the north, and they ONLY established settlements in the south until the mongols conquered the current (barely inhabitable) borders roundabout 300 years ago
You never heard of the Aztec, Mayan, Inca empire, have you?
that's meso and south american
Spain was literally BLACKED
Those are all Central and South American civilizations, we're talking North America
Ted Kaczynski style Anarcho-Primitavism which protected nature, it was actually the peak of civilization, where man lived in harmony with the wild.
Now most of the natural landscape has been bulldozed for pic related and it's never going to come back.
see
also