Why did no NA civilization emerge? What makes NA so different from Europe or China?
>natives of asian heritage with high IQ genes >lots of resources and animals >seasons, different climates require adaption >huge land where population can live in seperated regions and evolve into different cultures, resulting in competing city states, empires etc.
Is that really too many words for you? You must be really dumb.
Lucas Long
Eurasia is East to West and thus has a larger fertile zone. Allowing for trade of ideas etc. They also killed off horses and lacked cows.
Brandon Perry
>When white man find land, Indians running it, no taxes, no debt, plenty buffalo, plenty beaver, clean water. Women did all the work, Medicine Man free. Indian man spend all day hunting and fishing; all night having sex. Only white man dumb enough to think he could improve system like that.
Anthony Turner
not even close Tanner. you couldnt enslave us. and you brought the niggers here. that was a nigger move
It's literally this. The Americas have a majority of the world's arable lands and hunting grounds. There's no need for steal when the ground gives way to wood.
Zachary James
one thing whites and niggers have in common is NO PYRAMIDS
Ryder Jones
I'm just stating a fact. People hide flags are typically niggers. So why entertain a conversation with them thats not showing the error of their ways. begone negro.
Ayden Lopez
Nice way of saying that you can't argue against my argument. It's ok, I understand.
Gavin Flores
>a system like that the 1st nations were in constant war with each other. Most of the men would die w/o getting to nob the women due to war and infighting.
Nathan Wilson
This.
Conditions in Europe drove farming enhancements like the plow and winter survival culling. Tribal nomad cultures massively detract from homesteaders constantly refining techniques with failure leading to death.
Adam Evans
No sufficient drop to create agrarian society rewriting to settle down, lack of some crucial innovations leading to further devolopment. SA was able to build such societies.
Here are some factors that I could think of: 1. They settled notably later than most of the populations back in the Old World, as they needed time to travel TO the New World and ACROSS it. 2. My guess is, cultures evolve less rapidly and can store fewer memes if the population is nomadic AND if it's moving through harsh environment. 3. They were isolated from other cultures of the Old World (obviously). Being isolated is bad for cultural evolution.
In summary: NA's had less time and worse conditions for cultural evolution. Don't know about their average IQ, but if it's low, it's no help either.
Anthony Garcia
Individuals in Africa are not the brightest, unfortunately. Allow any other ethnic group of individuals, even the Arabs or Indians, and Africa would likely flourish as a civilization.
Austin Morales
Huh? Haiti is a place of descendants of the weaker Negroids of West Africa. The most strongest and smartest were the ones who sold them off. Go look up actual West African civilization
David Mitchell
armenians are arab lol
Ian Miller
Ted Kaczynski likes this post.
Isaac Morris
Armenians are West Asian, they are not Arab. If you ever call an Armenian arab they will beat you the hell up.
Easton Martinez
this is part of it
I'm going to list the reasons in no particular order >abundant resources does not force evolution >large land mass prevents overpopulation, henec continually abundant resources >original inhabitants in europe did not used to be smart. they got conquered by the aryans, the inventors of the wheel, that also built megalithic civs in the levant, then, they became MORE intelligent over time in europe >lack of 'gene introgression' that helped, in small amounts, to make europeans and asians smarter. e.g. over 10k years or so, small amounts of racial interbreeding of equally intelligent races DO make people more intelligent. but over 10k years. fucking a nigger is not going to make a smarter baby >higher death rates in europe. death accelerates evolution >european genetic isolation. europe, being smaller, makes it easier for smaller populations to become isolated, much like the galapagos finches >more recent arrival in america, less time to evolve
there might be a couple things I left out. but this is probably 95% of it
The Mayans and Aztecs were pretty civilized for their time, you just don't hear much about them because W H I T E
P E O P L E fucked them up pretty bad.
Dominic Richardson
chinese trade contributed quite a bit to the industrial revolution, but very little to any preindustrial events, given that there had not been chinese contact much before
the silk road itself provided very little, hence the incentive for the spanish to discover a route to india
it certainly had NO relation to superior european genetic evolution
Easton Rodriguez
Without the Silk Road europeans would've never gained gunpowder or the technique for constructing paper.
Andrew Rodriguez
didn't the spanish look for new routes to india because the not-so-friendly turks conquered the byzantine empire through which the silk road went to europe?
Daniel Jones
Catholic spain and Portugal gave central and south American tribes thier own countries, then American cia fbi freemansons fuged them up.
Anthony Jones
>this If there ever was a succesful socialistic community that was it
Dylan Nguyen
Agree to disagree. We're talking about thousands of years in development. Sure euro's invented quite a bit but would still be living in the copper age with out the basics agriculture, tech, and resources to spur the revolution.
you THINK that, but do you really have any evidence of that?
before europeans even had guns they had already, in the DARK AGE, surpassed every other civilization in shipbuilding in EVERY aspect. building better ships is the thing that ENDED the dark age by retaking hte med from muslim pirates
saying that europeans could have never discovered guns or paper independently is like saying europe could have never discovered the atom, nuclear physics, the airplane, genetics, DNA, evolution, etc. independently
there are literally like, 4 or 5 really basic things that europe did not invent independently, and the idea that europe could have never invented the other 99% of modern science ift hey didn't have some particular arbitrary invention from____insert nigger here_____ is fucking ridiculous. you've internalized nigger arguments
Cooper Anderson
Nah, thats not what they were saying it would just take way longer.
The continent is long North to South instead of East to West like Eurasia, which makes it very difficult for trade routes to exist. The silk road was a major factor in the spread of technology here. (even much before silk was a thing)
Jackson Young
Was GLR an actual NatSoc or was he simply a European Identitarian who used symbolizm to get attention and supporters?
thats part of it. but access to silk didn't spur the enlightenment or end of the dark ages. the silk road provided very little in terms of tech, and only provided a little, at very high cost, in terms of commdities
direct access to china/india could fund armies and NOT fund bloodthirsty muslim savages doing so
finding a method AROUND the silk road is one of the big spurs of the enlightenment. NOT the slk road itself
big fuckin difference
>copper age genetic europeans didn't even LIVE in europe in the copper age you lying nigger
Caleb Lewis
that nigger, and I quote, literally said "never"
fuck off reddit
Nolan Rivera
Why is your ego so fragile?
Also what makes you think "genetic" euro's didn't live in europe? Pretty sure anglos were living there 10's of thousands of years ago.
Jack Jenkins
Africans are just dumb They were given civilisation and they even fucked that up
Bentley Clark
You were savages before european arrive, now you're savage mutts
china is an entirely north to south country, and they managed to build roads just fine. ALL of the largest premodern infrastructure projects are in china, and all of them other than the great all of china run north to south the length of america
if you have any books by jared ((((diamond)))) set it on fire and punch yourself in the balls
Logan Moore
>reddit spaces
>tells others to go back. lmao, now you're just emotionally irrational. Maybe you should get your hormones checked, tranny.
Xavier Hall
It's not just the technology, it's the trade and the economic benefit it brings. Throughout history we've seen that trade and civilization are almost always synonyms.
But either way it's not just the silk road, it is the possibility for any one technology to spread from one area to another. We're talking about much earlier technologies than just gunpowder, like agriculture or animal husbandry. Great migrations from the east brought those innovations to Europe, for example.
Nolan James
and in Europe who best emerges? -------> kikes
Jason Hill
>y do u think a fact hurr durr literally read a book you idiot. genetically modern europeans didn't live in europe at that time. they lived around the steppes and russia
Alexander Gutierrez
Pretty sure spainards dark secret is that the moors raped you to your swarmy curly hair.
You guys are basically negro hybrids ;)
Brandon Peterson
No written language. Can't pass down or share knowledge without a written language. Shit gets forgotten through oral tradition.
Aaron Nguyen
They have higher denisovan DNA and are more primitive than those that stayed in Asia and got mixed with Cro Magnons. Only CroMags and Neanderthals had the spark of god and ability to create in them.
turk is asian in language and small in dna, armenian is full european
Benjamin Barnes
you're making vague claims. specify the migrations that brought "those great innovations"
pre-iron age tech other than the chariot has NO evidence of "diffusion" but instead spreads to areas that are conquered and repopulated. things like bronze are intensely sensitive to gigantic societal trade nets/supply chains, and do not simply "spread"
one of the things that makes the "iron age" such a big deal is that iron is relatively easy to manufacture in comparison, once its discovered
trade certainly plays some role. but europe discovered the renaissance in NEAR COMPLETE isolation. clearly trade didn't play that big of a role
Kevin Collins
Moors were majority Berber mostly actually. Although its not out of the realm of plausibly that some Spainiards in Iberia may have some Negro blood since the Berber states hired some West African mercenaries from time to time.. The only Negroes in muslim controlled Spain were either Eunuch (pagan) negroe haram guards or Muslim mercenary West Africans.. Maybe Hausa or Fulani
Adrian Howard
thing about meme flags faggot is that "certain people" use them to conceal who they really are so it's reasonable to expect suspicion when you use them
Armenians don't speak Turkish, they speak հայերեն. I said West Asian because their kingdom/place of origin is in West Asia. I never implied they are NOT caucasian though, but they are not European.
Mason Butler
Shit
Jayden Kelly
The indo-europeans, for instance, that domesticated the horse and invented the wheel? Yes, this was introduced through conquest, which was favored by the horizontal rather than vertical layout of the continents. If the hordes had had to cross a dense jungle through a narrow pass over thousands of kilometers they would have never invaded.
Now look at all the civilizations that we consider prosperous and how they all had a very broad trade network in common. Phoenicians, minoans, greeks, romans...
Jacob Watson
If you look at any berber or moor statue they look negro to me.
i dont say that -_- but seriously armenian is european brother is not asian, old country of armenian is turkish, is not caucase
Caleb Sanchez
geographically, china is very isolated. their racial purity is partly the result of a successful campaign of conscious racial purity and genocide, and partly the result of high levels of geographical isolation. outside of coastal china, there is mostly only vast mountain ranges, desert, and very poor soil. almost all of china lives 100 miles from the eastern coast
the chinese homeland is in the north, and they ONLY established settlements in the south until the mongols conquered the current (barely inhabitable) borders roundabout 300 years ago
Jayden Sullivan
You never heard of the Aztec, Mayan, Inca empire, have you?