There is a poll. You know what to do.
docs.google.com
Be sure to 'explain' your choice.
There is a poll. You know what to do.
docs.google.com
Be sure to 'explain' your choice.
Other urls found in this thread:
In case you have any doubts about the crimes of the japs: en.m.wikipedia.org
At the time it was looked at as the easiest way to end the war...also it was estimated that the U.S.A. would lose 1,000,000 toops just trying to take mainland Japan so it was looked at as necessary
troops*
Nice data mining scheme, faggot
So why didn't they try a ceasefire first? I'm sure the Japs would have listened.
Poll's not mine, homosexual.
Can't vote because poll doesn't have the correct choice. First nuke was a good decision, but the second one was needless
>get attacked by japs
>”hey can you guys not”
>Japs stop and war ends
Not sure...I do know we thought at the time that they wouldn't give up even if we threatened to invaded the mainland.....we dropped one nuke and they didn't surrender...so the Generals might have been right about them not surrendering if we threatened to invade
they wouldn't surrender after the first Nuke leaf..so we dropped another ...then they surrendered...it was necessary
They literally trained their kids to run to the beach with sharpened sticks in case we invaded.
>'explain' your choice.
Ching Chong Ding Dong where dog go?
>Strongly agree
Ended the war quickly without a US invasion of Japan (would have taken years and lots of US casualties), was a big dick show off to the Soviets, and most importantly avoided a Japan divided like Korea- IIRC had the US gone with an invasion of Japan, the Soviets were going to invade the northern portions as well, leaving a divided Japan. Nuking them was definitely a good choice
Put strongly agree and said it's because I'm Chinese.
And that makes it better why?
Voted strongly disagree. I hate nips but I hate amerifats even more.
All the newfags aren't sure what to vote and they want to be told
>This form was created inside of Howard County Public School System.
From an American point of view, yes, it was a good decision.
I ain't gaining data, just happy to fuck up someone's fun
Bump
Just told them we shoulda nuked Israel. What are the consequences? :v)
>that kind of reasoning but is too pussy to commit to "strongly agree"
Find your balls
Why not drop one city destroying nuke instead of two? Surely they won't want to fight if we drop one!
Disagree, because it led to the allies winning