Was it justified? Who do you think was in the wrong?
What are your thoughts on the Iranian Revolution?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
britannica.com
twitter.com
>wears rags on head
>wipes ass with hand
good post
Proof that fundies can't be trusted during a revolution; let them eat bullets then cut their head off or else they'll do that to you
>>better cover up our babez that shits haram my dude
Were they really in the wrong though? Iran had been under the control of foreign powers for decades up to that point. After the treatment of Mohammad Mosaddegh could you really blame the extreme reaction of the Iranian people?
Absolutely justified. You can hate Islam, but ousting the Shah and the upper class the way they did was what needed to be done. To all the "Persians" in America whose parents fled in 79' and continue to curse the Islamic Republic or Iran, I'd tell you to go eat dicks, but your faggot asses have been getting pozz'd in LA. for 30+ years.
I used to actually buy into the shit about the Lebanese Christians and secular Iranians being great people back in the day before their civil wars and revolutions, but you guys were greedy uppity niggers who deserve to be diaspora. You're 10x worse than the Muslims that kicked you out.
based and correctpilled
Based
based
I don't know much about it but I have never heard of a scenario where as US puppet got ousted by his own people and didn't deserve it. That and all the non-stop US propaganda about what a liberal paradise Iran was before that makes me think it was 100% justified.
Ehhhh no, go fuck yourself you muzzie commie cuck.
>all the non-stop US propaganda about what a liberal paradise Iran was before
Yea that shit is played up a lot by old boomers.
Why do you think the Revolution was not justified?
the ayatollah was returned to Iran from France on a CIA jet to topple the shah after he decided he didnt want to be friends anymore. Seemed like a good move at the time.
it happened because of that dumb disgusting faggot jimmy carter.
You mean the french revolution in Iran in wich BP was replaced by Total
Calm Down, Arman. Go wax your BMW for the second time this week, that should make you happy again
Don't bully Jimmy he did the best he could
I can't wait to see your tribe swim to France when the sand niggers take back that forsaken place.
He removed Western degeneracy and Israeli influence from Iran
Kys Shapiro
Yea I don't really agree with the fundamentalism but he undeniably took back the country for Iranians
The issue I have with the Iranian Revolution and Jow Forums's warped perspective of Iran are based on four things:
1. Iran's a theology. No country on the planet should be run by a theological government, a religion calling the shots of the institutions of a nation is backwards, anti-science, and incompatible with the modern world and its advancements to space. Because of this, Iran's motives and policies are religious based and religions all have a form of egalitarianism involved with them.
2. Iran's far more hostile to the United States than to Israel. The Iranians seized the US embassy in Tehran because of the US' support of the secular, yet authoritarian, Shah who wanted to westernize and modernize Iran by suppressing the radical/religious Islamic clergy. He failed and was overthrown by the Ayatollah, who brought in the theology government. Because of this, Iran views the US, Americans, and whites in general as enemies and the devil to be fought against, even going as far to ban suits and ties because of it. They don't see the US as a puppet of Israel but Israel as a puppet of the US as a form of neo-colonialism and their hatred is centered on the United States as a Christian White nation that overthrew their Socialist Prime Minister in the 50s. This is why Jews are given equal rights in Iran but I'll get to that later.
(1/2)
(2/2)
3. Islamist expansionism, I have no doubt that a good chunk of the anti-Iranian sentiment in the news is due to Jewry and I don't think Iran is as big a distributor of terrorism as Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, or any of the Sunni Arabs states, but Iran does export its theological ideology of a form of political Islam across the Middle-East, even for Islamic states to reform in India. It is a legitimate threat but not on the level as Israel or Saudi Arabia, but Iran is hostile to the US, wants to export Islam, and have committed acts of espionage on the US.
4. And the final issue is that Iran isn't actually anti-Semitic or even really nationalist. As I said before, Jews have equal rights and the ability to practice their religion in peace. They can't hold government office or any shit like that but they can organize among themselves and conspire, as they always do. Like before, Iran sees the US as its primary enemy, they hate Israel and its existence the same way all Muslims hate israel, they hate that their Dar al-Islam is occupied by a foreign people. This is why they see Israel as an act of neo-colonialism by the US to divide up Muslim lands with a Zionist state. Don't get me wrong, Zionism and Jews should be snuffed out but it should be by us, not the Iranians. If the Iranians get to Israel first, it'll just be a step backwards for Jews but they'll reorganize and make the best of their situation. Religion is not based on logic and rationalism, it's based on mysticism and expansion.
I don't think Iran is as bad as the West makes it out to be, but I can't support a religiously fueled nation like Iran. It's too much of a wild card and its hatred of Western civilization makes an alliance with them an "enemy of my enemy" scenario. They're useful for weakening Israeli influence in the Middle-East, but I wish the Persians return to Zoroastrianism or the Shah and come to the understanding that their enemy is Judaism itself and not the West and Whites.
>Iran views the US, Americans, and whites in general as enemies and the devil to be fought against
Iran is one of the friendliest countries I've ever visited and I say that as a white dude from the Balkans. Don't believe everything you read user
Iran isn't guided by religion anymore. The most important sectors are guided by money and the economy and the pasdaran are in control of it all. They hold the true power. For them the Islamic Republic is just a useful tool to stay in power and to legitimise that.
everyone but me gotta learn that's nonsense
>Iran isn't guided by religion anymore
Yes it is, it wouldn't have an Ayatollah as the head of state if it wasn't.
>from the Balkans
That's neat for a Balkan, whose people have been heavily Islamified, but for a Christian American that's a different story.
>That's neat for a Balkan, whose people have been heavily Islamified, but for a Christian American that's a different story.
Do you think they know I'm from the Balkans dude? All they see is a white guy and people were very nice to me no issues whatsoever. Have you even been to Iran?
Justified, Iran would’ve probably went the same way as either Sweden or India with the Shah in power. Degeneracy destroys every country it touches.
Mashallah Pilled. Marg Tehrangeles.
Have you heard about the Iranians and the Americans collaborating during the invasion of Afghanistan? The Iranians assisted in the fall of Herat, major city that is near the Iranian border. Bush apparently fucked up this relationship afterwards when he did the axis of evil speech.
There would’ve been no revolution if the Shah wasn’t such a dick. Flying in gourmet lunches from France via Concorde. His wife bathing in milk, when there wasn’t enough milk for Iranian kids. Total dicks. Of course there was a revolution.
based
Agree on the Persian diaspora, but a lot of Leb Christians are more based than they used to be during that strange Phoenician ideology era. Leb Christians support Hezbollah and identify as Arabs today. Those that don’t are retards living in Brazil. I used to hate Lebanese Christians, but it turns out most of the problems stemmed from greedy Maronites who are like a clan. There’s many other Leb Christian sects who are infinitely more based, such as the Arab nationalist orthodox ones. I’d like to see Leb Christians unite more with the Shi’a and btfo Israel once and for all. Same to the copts of Egypt, very cool people.
Based as fuck and removed the kike puppet shah regime
Kys, most sandnigs wash themselves with water and you with paper, which one is disgusting?
You see, the issues that I bring up deal with the state, not the people. A people are not necessary defined by their state, the state is supposed to be a political organization meant to uphold rule of law and protection of a people. I have no doubt the Persian people, themselves, are charitable and kindhearted people, that's a trait that differentiates them from Arabs. The problem is with the state, the theology, how it runs, how it spreads, it's anti-western rhetoric. Jow Forums I don't think really understand that difference, they just see Iran's anti-Zionism and assume they're allies but just as you never really know a person, you can never know the true intentions of a state.
I don't think the Iranian government is for the Persian people, it's for the Muslim people, the clergy, the religious and the zealous. It's head of state is an Ayatollah, one that had called for the US to ban guns and seize them from its people. That's not nationalism, a state should allow its people to arm itself. The protests in Iran in recent years show a divide between the people and the government, the people just simply wanting a better standard of living not based around religious law. I do not agree with or the anti-Shah sentiment, the anti-Shah sentiment in Iran was caused by the Shah's desire to Westernize Iran along the same lines as Japan to create a secular nation, this came about after the Shah got complete power from the Prime Minister, who as I've said was a socialist. The Shah wasn't a kike puppet pushing for degeneracy, the Shah was a man trying to improve the nation through western reform, it had nothing to do with Jewry.
I do appreciate Iran for at least standing up to Zionism but they're not fully red pilled on the Jewish question. They cannot be allowed to organize at any costs.
I hadn't heard of it but it wouldn't have surprised me, Iran bordered a radical Sunni extremist nation, if the US didn't invade it, Iran would have.
Evidence of Carter's incompetence.
Iran should've stayed Sunni though
Cucked and bluepilled, I may not care for the post-Shah theological Iran but I'd take it over a Sunni Iran any day. Sunnis are the niggers of the Muslim world. I respect and appreciate Shias far more.
But a Zoroastrian Iran would be best Iran desu
If Iran was Sunni it would've been a beast and it would've been easier to unite the Muslim world against westernization
>Zoroastrian
Ok now why is everybody dicksucking Zoroastrianism? If Z. replaced Islam in the current role of religion in the regime it'd be truly weird, not to say backwards
Corporate jewish slave of atheist secular trash nation that worship money and export their degeneracy world wide is better alternative! Religious countries will be better for people if they were run by actual religious people and not filthy atheists in disguise. All western nations went into full degenerate shitholes after secularism. Total corruption of women comes with atheism hand in hand.
Also, another thing I forgot to mention was that the Shah voted against the creation of Israel because he predicted its existence would lead to generations of violence in the Middle-East.
Zoroastrianism is basically an early Abrahamic-esque religion that was based on purity, logic, rationalism as well as a respect and appreciation towards nature and astronomy that would go on to inspire the Greeks and the Abrahamic religions and its impact on Iranian culture is why Persians are so exceptional.
en.wikipedia.org
britannica.com
I can never really support a Muslim nation, even if it was Shi'ite due to the historical animosity between it and the West. Zoroastrian Persia was able to stand toe-to-toe with Rome for centuries, only falling to Islam when its army died in a plague that wiped out most of its populace.
>Corporate jewish slave of atheist secular trash nation that worship money and export their degeneracy world wide is better alternative! Religious countries will be better for people if they were run by actual religious people and not filthy atheists in disguise. All western nations went into full degenerate shitholes after secularism. Total corruption of women comes with atheism hand in hand.
See this man? I think you might be familiar with him. This man ran a secular/atheist state while fighting Jewish power and maintaining anti-degeneracy and miscegenation laws. You don't need a religion to tell you what to do or to maintain morality, solidarity in race and purity is what is needed. Religion is egalitarianism, it feeds the idea that if you believe in the same god youre equal. Your women might not be whores but they can marry a nigger if they please. And I also believe Muslim treatment of Women is far harsher than it should be. A woman should not be stoned to death for leaving her house without a man.
Without it we wouldn't have Nasim.