>using the bible
A question for Christians of this board
Oh well I thought their would be more Europeans
>>From their own specific retarded interpretation
If you let a short sighted nigger read a book and spoke ebonics and you asked him about what he read, do you expect him to give you exactly what was in the book from his word?
Here is the lineage feel free to check the bible.
AdamSeth130130Genesis 5SethEnosh105235Genesis 5EnoshKenan90325Genesis 5KenanMahalel70395Genesis 5MahalelJared65460Genesis 5JaredEnoch162622Genesis 5EnochMethuselah65687Genesis 5MethuselahLamech187874Genesis 5LamechNoah1821056Genesis 5NoahFlood6001656Genesis 7:11FloodArphaxad21658Genesis 11ArphaxadShelah351693Genesis 11ShelahEber301723Genesis 11EberPeleg341757Genesis 11PelegReu301787Genesis 11ReuSerug321819Genesis 11SerugNahor301849Genesis 11NahorTerah291878Genesis 11TerahAbram1302008Genesis 11AbrahamIsaac1002108Genesis 21:5IsaacJacob602168Genesis 25:26JacobEgypt1302298Genesis 47:9Jacob in EgyptExodus4302728Exodus 12:40ExodusTemple begun48032081 Kings 6:1TempleExile3453553
No using exact dates and numbers specified by the bible.
Top teir
>Where does the neanderthal and human migration into mainland Europe ( based on carbon dating of bones ) fit in with your views of creationism.
do you think Semites and the non-Semitic tribes in the middle-east knew about fucking Neanderthals when they composed the fucking oral traditions that would become the Bible?
My point is that they do not fit into either the Adam and eve story or the 6000 year old earth as described in the bible
genesis isn't meant to be taken literally.
because the bible was composed in the Bronze Age and Neanderthals died out 30 000 years ago
it's not difficult, and any Christian who does not deny science admits this
the story of Eden is about the Fall of Man, and origin of our sin and why we suffer and die and need Jesus to be saved
the imagery fits into a broader Indo-European mythological foundation
it's just that the Sumerian and Semitic version is what ended up in the Bible