Mig-31BM with Kh-47m2 "Kinzhal"
Hypersonic missile.
Mig-31BM with Kh-47m2 "Kinzhal"
Kayden Martinez
John Foster
Ok
Wyatt Walker
This literally looks like "Iskander" missile. What the fuck are they doing?
Caleb Adams
can they afford the fuel to start the jet?
Ryan Watson
So, with all the pixels missing, am i to assume its designed to curtail Japanese expansion?
Joshua Turner
False, jet benis.
Nathan Carter
Trying to get a new stand off air to ground ordnance with minimal investment in research and development. Just firing it at altitude and already at high speed saves a ton of fuel for missile and gives extra range.
Juan Sanders
this is the only corrrect answer, its too lewd to show on a christian chinese cave painting website, also everybody knows russian plane benis are barbed
Jason Bell
Of course.... Will they remember to take the parking break off the missile this time though?
Aaron Parker
Hey, baby, wake up from your asleep
We have arrived onto the future
And the whole world is become
Elektronik supersonik
Supersonik elektronik
Hey, baby, ride with me away
We doesn't have much time
My blue jeans is tight
So onto my love rocket, climb
Inside tank of fuel is not fuel, but love
Above us, there is nothing above
But the stars, above
All systems gone!
Prepare for downcount!
Five, four, three, one!
Off blast!
Nathaniel Gonzalez
Kinzhal in the May 9 V day parade
Isaac Rivera
Dominic Sanchez
What's up with these "Kinzhal is a Iskander" meme that the teenager armchair generals have created? The designer is the same, of course the outside is going to look similar, internally it's different.
Gabriel Price
>russia
>afford fuel
That's the one thing Russia has in abundance.
The "Power of Siberia" pipeline heading too China will move 38 billion m3/yr of natural gas. $55 billion to build, 3,000km long, initial flow contract is worth $400 billion.
Easton Roberts
ni44er, when you go Hypersonic externals matter almost more than internals
no fucking way that shit is capable of sustaining > 5 Mach for any substantial amount of time that would matter
and that's coming from a Russian
Easton Gomez
lol missed a button, was replying to
Wyatt Sullivan
Checked the variants they dont really look the same. Iskander is way bigger
Samuel Morales
>and that's coming from a Russian
So fuck off back to 2ch/po, armchair engineer.
Ryan Roberts
Have some nerds figure out missile's dimensions already?
Logan Allen
That missile has 1240 miles range. And mach 10 speed.
Cooper Hernandez
Iskander has hypersonic terminal phase, dumb dvach scum.
Robert Foster
Siberia is also going to be majority Han by 2040 and Ching Chongs won't give a fuck if Russian shit stirring means they need the oil and gas for a war, Chings paid for the pipeline Ivan, now give!!!
Henry Johnson
Chinks rent some areas for farming, but that's all, if they try to annex we gas them all.
Gabriel Murphy
>Russia successfully fighting China
Lul
Grayson Collins
Their military is terrible and their nukes don't even work, it would be a one-sided beating.
Juan Stewart
Everyday we get closer to making Ace Combat real
Robert Moore
Too bad it won't be used because Russia is a complete and total cuck
Ethan Ortiz
Robert Reed
But will it target both enemy missile AND the carrier?
Chase Reyes
Somehow I don't believe that...
Jaxson Collins
>Mig-31
when are they going to replace this with a better aircraft
Austin Wilson
Why replace the best interceptor of the world???
Brandon Butler
>Siberia is also going to be majority Han
Too cold for them. Their own northern territories is underpopulated and undeveloped. It is cheaper to buy resources.
Chase Thomas
the us had it beat in 1962. mig-31 is an ugly brick
Hudson Anderson
It's already the best interceptor the world has ever seen.
Austin Taylor
>no armament
nice kite
Dylan Cox
That is the YF-12, Einstein, not the SR-71. The YF-12 was armed.
Henry Rogers
Until it has to turn
Christian Fisher
>ME GO FAST
>ME GOOD INTERCEPTOR
Jonathan Williams
thediplomat.com
>China is developing and has been flight-testing a nuclear-capable air-launched ballistic missile (ALBM) along with a new long-range strategic bomber to deliver it, The Diplomat has learned.
>According to U.S. government sources with knowledge of the latest intelligence assessments on the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, China has conducted five flight tests of the unnamed missile. The U.S. intelligence community is calling the new missile the CH-AS-X-13.
Jaxon Murphy
It have world first datalink system and a pretty power full RADAR.
Jaxon Richardson
the MiG-41 is a thing
Easton Morris
I keep thinking the striped thing is a loli in a dress every time I pass this thread.
Oliver Richardson
solid post. 10/10
Joshua Cruz
>Status Canceled
>Number built 3
>Status In service
>Number built 519
YF-12 was shit.
Ethan Carter
>moving the goalposts
Isaiah Edwards
It's a pretty clever way to find use for the Foxhound desu. High altitude bomber interception died 50 years ago.
Grayson Sanders
Plz stop boomers and leftists with it.
Isaac White
>Status In limited service
>Number built 1,186
No one gives a damn about your shitty faulty prototype kite.
Oliver Carter
>to find use for the Foxhound
Foxhound has its use as an interceptor.
>High altitude bomber interception died 50 years ago
Gee, must be the reason MiG-31 role was never limited to high altitude interception. Also good luck flying BUFFs at treetop level.
Elijah Perez
>meme
Camden Harris
>2011
>still using heavy interceptors
Brayden Brooks
>one hypersonic ballistic thingie looks like another hypersonic ballistic thingie
Gee, i wonder why...
Aaron Flores
>20xx
>Not using interceptors
Aaron Morgan
>1988
>not able to develop an engine that allows for an air superiority fighter to be made that can intercept and dogfight
Russian MIC is a joke that fleeced more money out of people than the entirety of the western worlds mic combined
Kayden Morris
>20xx
>Not being able to endure Mach 2.4 for 15 minutes
>Not carrying 400 km range hypersonic AAMs with 60 kg warheads
>Calling himself an interceptor
Go play with your ballet class friends, homo.
Hudson Green
Matthew Hernandez
Su-27 offer better cover, only advantage the MiG-31 offers is intercepting high altitude supersonic bombers, that no one uses anymore.
Jason Wright
Thats not an interceptor dude, it is a reconnaissance aircraft.. And it was cancelled long time ago.
Jacob Fisher
>Su-27 offer better cover
Show me Su-27 coverage at Mach 2.4 with 4 60 kg warhead missiles. Pro tip: it less than 700 km.
>only advantage the MiG-31 offers is intercepting high altitude supersonic bombers
MiG-31 role was never limited to high altitude interception.
>that no one uses anymore.
Good luck flying BUFFs at treetop level.
David Davis
It's neither an interceptor, nor a recon aircraft. It's a cancelled prototype.
Nathaniel Allen
That´s not a SR-71...
en.wikipedia.org
Read the damn filename
Isaac Williams
That why it is called interceptor.. he need to be fast, not agile.
Joshua Brown
>Show me Su-27 coverage at Mach 2.4 with 4 60 kg warhead missiles. Pro tip: it less than 700 km.
Simply not needed, because the only things it would intercept are either ancient B-52s or terrain hugging B-1s that your long range missiles would be either overkill or useless against.
Neither needs mach 2.4 cruise to intercept.
B-2s you would not even know were there and if by some miracle of slav radar magic you did see it you don´t need that type of speed to intercept it either.
>he need to be fast, not agile
>he
Slav retard detected
Brody Rodriguez
the biggest oil producer of the world cant afford fuel?
those are the kind of people that try to do discussions in Jow Forums
Jayden Peterson
Meaning Su-27 does not offer better cover.
>the only things it would intercept are either ancient B-52s or terrain hugging B-1s
Wrong.
>that your long range missiles would be either overkill or useless against
Statement based on your ass.
>Neither needs mach 2.4 cruise to intercept.
The faster it can go the sooner it can intercept.
>B-2s you would not even know were there
Lol.
>you don´t need that type of speed to intercept it either
Yes you do, because the earlier you intercept it the more time ground component of air defence has to react.
Like seriously, get the fuck out, you're unbelievably uninformed and ignorant.
Hunter Robinson
Can´t unsee.
Camden Hall
>Insults because he can´t deal with the facts..
USA coward detected.
Jaxson Russell
The B-2's stealth only works against ground-based radar.
Eli Fisher
Nobody talking about this little demon?
Adam Jenkins
>beat
Funny, given the MiG-25 and MiG-31 were the primary reason for the Blackbird to be retired.
The Soviets built rugged, mass-production-capable interceptors that could be flown out of small airstrips at the ass end of Siberia, while carrying a full war load, and were still capable of keeping up with a practically handcrafted, purpose-built hangar queen of an unarmed spy plane well enough to prevent it from actually doing its job. Which in turn caused it to die the quiet death of obsolescence.
Josiah Brown
>Funny, given the MiG-25 and MiG-31 were the primary reason for the Blackbird to be retired.
Funny, considering SR-71 didn´t even need to enter Soviet airspace.
The real reason the SR-71 was retired was greater satellite coverage and resolution and increasing effectiveness of drones.
Easton Lopez
>can only go mach 2 for 15 minutes because of engine strain
>thinking this is a good thing when the antiquated f-15 can go longer without any issues
heavy interceptors are a joke and have no business being in service anywhere. the only reason to use them is because your aviation industry is so shit that it can't make a proper air superiority fighter
Jordan Price
>literally gets shit on by his own sources
>b-b-b-but it can go faster for a little bit before falling out of the sky from lack of fuel
>implying based Su-27 can't carry every munition the shitheap that is MiG's abomination can carry
There's a reason why MiG is dead and why Sukhoi is still around.
Jordan Gonzalez
Jace Davis
>Yes you do, because the earlier you intercept it the more time ground component of air defence has to react.
If the aircraft intercepts it, why would the ground component need to react?
What scrambles the interceptor if ground radars haven´t spotted the target?
Just, what?
Easton Ortiz
There's nothing particularly interesting about it, and I'm pretty sure the statistics given for it's performance are fake. Also, where's the intake for the scramjet?
Xavier Anderson
>heavy interceptors are a joke and have no business being in service anywhere
The whole point of this thread is the new Kh-47m2 hypersonic missile with ground attack capability and also engage warships capability.
carried and launched by Mig-31BM a heavy interceptor multirole fighter.
Jason Brown
>2000 km range
>Hypersonic
"nothing interesting about it"
Eli Smith
>interceptor multirole fighter.
stop it
Anything the MiG-31 can carry, the Su-27 series can as well and is capable of carrying larger payloads.
Joshua Rivera
>because of engine strain
>antiquated f-15 can go longer without any issues
Just how much more ignorant can you get, retard?
>Not using interceptors
Lol.
Henry Bell
>Literally has no arguments
>Keeps posting
Show me Su-27 coverage at Mach 2.4 with 4 60 kg warhead missiles, nigger.
>MiG is dead
>81 MiG-29K
>Two orders for MiG-35
>MiG-41 R&D
Oh look, another ignorant imbecile.
Nathan Peterson
Su-27 can´t carry R-33.
Also, I can´t find the numbers but i am pretty sure Mig-31 range is superior to Su-27/Su-35.
Both are in service for a reason. None can replace the other.
Grayson Stewart
3,000km for the MiG-31
Elijah Ortiz
>If the aircraft intercepts it, why would the ground component need to react?
Because nothing is 100% effective.
>What scrambles the interceptor if ground radars haven´t spotted the target?
Radars pick something, interceptor is scrambled at Mach 2.4 to shoot down the target as soon as possible giving ground air defence information on the enemy and more room to defend against it.
>Just, what?
Being on patrol, AEW&C, OTH radar, usual ground based radar.
Jackson Nguyen
>Anything the MiG-31 can carry, the Su-27 series can as well
Get the fuck out you dumb motherfucking ignorant imbecile clown bitch.
Robert Reed
MiG-31 can carry 22 tons
Su-27 is 16 tons empty
So an Su-27 should be able to carry another Su-27 under it!
Jason Reyes
>Anything the MiG-31 can carry, the Su-27 series can as well and is capable of carrying larger payloads.
Not with nearly the same cruising speed, though.
Michael Brown
>81 MiG-29K
That would be impressive, if it was ordered from a nation like Sweden or some other nation that barely keeps a functioning airforce. A drop in a bucket.
Might be enough to cover development cost at best?
>Two orders for MiG-35
Implying Russia will ever take delivery of all of them.
>MiG-41 R&D
Vaporware, tell me the story about how it will operate in outer space too?
See
>Radars pick something, interceptor is scrambled at Mach 2.4 to shoot down the target as soon as possible giving ground air defence information on the enemy and more room to defend against it.
You mean radar detects "something", scramble fighters that have to abort due to unmaintained engines blowing up on take off and SAMs down every airliner over Russian airspace?
Joshua Long
>Implying implications
Good that no one gives a damn about your opinion then, shitposting clown.
Oliver Miller
Nice arguments, really told me there Ivan.
Nathan James
Yep, there are those fake statistics again...
Liam Edwards
>He keeps posing
Lol. You won't even get a (You) for this pathetic clownery.
Nolan Murphy
Hunter Fisher
It is really a magnificent aircraft, it´s just too bad it is likely a developmental and evolutionary dead end.
Maybe the 41 can carry on the legacy but i doubt it.
Joshua White
There's nothing of dead end about it.
Kevin Watson
This atrocity of design actually looks like the real deal, it has an easily identifiable intake and is large enough to be a long-range cruise missile unlike the Kinzhal.
Grayson Hall
Irrelevant. The Su-27 has a vastly larger range meaning it can get into a better position or even loiter as need be. Then it can actually turn so it's capable of protecting itself.
There's a reason why Mikoyan is out of business and everything it had was bought up by others.
Henry Anderson
So where are we on the Vatnik bingo? So far I've got broken record, insults, Russian delusion and alcoholic rage. Anyone else playing?
Jaxon Cooper
>This atrocity of design
t.armchair engineer