Is there a reason why some states (ex:NJ) provide provisions which exempt off-duty and/or retired LEOs from guns laws which apply to the general population?
I understand the love for the thin-blue-line runs deep on the right, but it seems counter-intuitive to support these provisions, as it probably significantly cuts down the amount of support for concealed carry, since it is guaranteed to some based on profession.
Is there any good material on this topic?
Bootlickers live to treat cops as if theyre noble knights or samurai instead of garbage collectors.
If they weren't allowed off duty CC, they wouldn't be able to pass the background check for the permit due to DV.
Pic related.
NJ and other places treat their cops like the friggin STASI. They give them special permissions so they go along with all the gun control bills. I have a feeling they will eventually and slowly be disarmed due to all this BLM crap though.
I love cops in general, especially mine, but NJ cops SUCK. So glad I left that state.
Bootlickers gonna lick...
Can you clarify? DV?
Domestic violence
black lives matter and other paid protest groups only have power in cities like baltimore which already stand as shining examples of how not to run a city
New Yorker here. The NY SAFE Act exempts current and retired police officers from pretty much all gun laws with a few exceptions. The biggest reason is because Emperor Cuomo thinks cops are on a higher plane of existence, and they somehow need an upper hand to keep the sheep in line.
The SAFE Act had to exempt police from the laws because the laws themselves are unnecessarily strict. The worst part is the exemptions were put in place after the original law was passed.