Whats are the weak points on China's new tank?

Whats are the weak points on China's new tank?

Attached: newchinktanks.jpg (1018x539, 74K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=BzdJFLDGaNg
youtube.com/watch?v=AVRYTEes9UM
youtube.com/watch?v=u3y01rwrsrE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Sides, top, rear, bottom

Its Chinese made and designed

It's county of origin and said country's populace

This.
Basically it's weak points are on two sides.
The insides
And the outsides

Its made by Norinco, and not the "good" Norinco

Attached: JW-21A_2.jpg (561x640, 75K)

frontal armor is very good, almost 1,5 meters of RHA equivalent armor thickness (without counting the heavy ERA - just LOS thickness).

The top as well is surprisingly well armored with its thicker plates and add-on ERA. Would make it resistant against most EFPs.

Side armor is maybe its only weak-point, but this is shared by literally all other tanks as well.

Attached: ZTZ-99A Top Military Parade Rehearsal .jpg (1600x1076, 473K)

>it has armor
So does every tank built after the Trojan war, what makes it worth spending money on.

I noticed these, what do you think?

Attached: edit.jpg (1018x539, 117K)

The MG port should be vulnerable. But it is a relatively small area. Turret-ring also, but this is also very small and modern APFSDS do not exploit "shot trap" features.

For the lower glacis, I dont know enough of its construction to say. Usually modern tanks have composite armor there. But I'm not sure.

Attached: 210944rckrq84tszbqaa08.jpg (2020x1816, 696K)

>weak points
suspension
youtube.com/watch?v=BzdJFLDGaNg

Came here to post this.

that its a weaker baseline 80's t-72bv with no side armor and a worse gun

you forgot to mention the lack of sinister PTSD inducing eyes

Attached: fuybaoor8eui6qfsxna8.jpg (886x591, 144K)

IMPRESSIVE

Attached: 57E7B9F8-936E-4905-8581-3815B33EE471.png (1073x386, 338K)

>52 caliber ZTP-98A 125mm gun worse than legendarily bad, inaccurate and low pressure 2A46M

Can Russia even into long rod penetrators these days?

Attached: 204741s3h7rcdfocfhf33r.jpg (2868x1878, 1.15M)

Did the pin just snap when the wheel took that impact? Pretty catastrophic failure.

Seems to be the weakpoint of literally every other tank during rough driving and hitting hard obstacles.

Attached: T-72 losing wheel.jpg (260x800, 39K)

>2A46M
>inaccurate and low pressure
Imbecile.

Or rather, inferior munitions.

gas

"No."

Red areas = turret throwing
Yellow = probably knock it out with top tier MBT guns.

Attached: 1527740224764.jpg (1018x539, 89K)

so you came here to tell us you're 1) retarded and 2) have nothing of value to contribute.

Ok. You've said now piece. Now go and stay go.

>Side armor is maybe its only weak-point, but this is shared by literally all other tanks as well.
Speak for yaself, chink shill

Attached: 55f21e31aac9bce439c5ae5ca4d750fd.jpg (3600x2400, 838K)

rough terrain makes the wheels fall off

Tolerances
Reliability
Consistancy

Definitely the sides and rear.
It's silly that the least armored areas are what's important to it's mobility.

OH WOW, LET ME BOLT SOME FUCKING APPLIQUE ARMOR ONTO A ZTZ99. NOW IT DOESN'T HAVE SIDE ARMOR WEAKNESSES.

you fucking retard.

You couldn't drive it anywhere though

So, how do you explain the T-72 losing that wheel?

viewports are unserviceable for western people, too small

the T-72 is loosing an "idler wheel", the Chink tank lost a road wheel

The Type 99A actually has pretty western crew ergonomics, as in it is actually quite large inside.

Attached: 26_135164_d5f15584b32438f.png (640x480, 371K)

Which is even worse.

The Idler wheel is what is holding the treads tight. Losing a roadwheel isnt as catastrophic.

Inferior compared to what?

youtube.com/watch?v=AVRYTEes9UM

Why is Russki fire control and stabilization so bad? They are using their T-72s like WWII tanks, while China uses their Type 96A like a 21st century tank.

No, I came here to state the obvious fact that Chinese = shit.
>have nothing of value to contribute
I'm not a gook so this doesn't apply to me.

You can clearly see the part where the crew is ripped into 2 halves.

>China uses their Type 96A like a 21st century tank
Worse than Kazakhstan.

Attached: Screenshot-2018-5-31 Tank biathlon - Wikipedia.png (165x378, 7K)

Hahaha oh wow. Stop and go and still miss ALL their shots?

lol nigga u dumb as fuck. Why didn't your mom abort you? I would have donated a coat hanger or two, and if you're game, I'll donate a 9mm slug.

Yeah, only ex-USSR cunts would use their tanks as race-cars. In all measures that are actually relevant for combat, China came out ahead (before the Russians made up dumb rule revisions).

watch the fucking game and read the rules. Look up when was the last time sabots were allowed and the score for that game.

It's ok to be stupid. It's ok to be ignorant. It's not ok to be stupid AND ignorant.

>stupid AND ignorant
this post gave me AIDs

Attached: time to die.jpg (500x666, 104K)

>Impotent rage of a gook with tiny penis
Enjoy having shitty T-55 knockoff instead of a tank.
How does it feel needing a second wall against the mighty north Eurasian Turkic master race driving based Russian tanks?
youtube.com/watch?v=u3y01rwrsrE

don't worry, you got it a long time ago getting pounded in the ass.

oh look a shitskin. Enjoy your 18th century civilization, roach.

>Can't even handle copying T-55 properly, wheels fall off
Piss skin gook ape shill on suicide watch.

Chinks in armour

>western turret
>Russian hull

Chinks really do lack imagination.

>NOW IT DOESN'T
So where are this side armor of ZTZ99? No, nada?

So shut da fuck up.

>applique
look up what it means, you illiterate skit monkey.

>western turret

Attached: t-55 cargo cult2.jpg (1280x888, 157K)

Come back when you learn about explosive reactuve armor and ROMOR ERA on those Challenger-2, you dumbfuck.

WWWWWWWWW

holy fuck, did they really just weld a box onto a cast turret?

faggit

It's literally just an el-cheapo T-55 with some ERA slapped on it.

Attached: 4564564564.png (500x280, 205K)

no u

Yes, user, yes they did.

Attached: t-55 cargo cult.jpg (892x484, 79K)

is this the new Hunter 2-1 actual bullshit?

just running some test

Actually welding boxes like that onto older tanks as spaced armour, or shape the ERA like that isn't a bad idea. I would really help PID in a war between NATO and Russia as countries like Poland and Finland still use older Soviet equiptment.

...

...

Found it, now I just gotta fit as much profanity into that as possible.

CUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUMCUM

Its 99 letters everybody

Its made of chinesium armor. strong as butter.

Mavericks

come back when you aren't a dumb fuck who completely missed the fucking point.

...

im back, it was me all along

This is clearly just a T-55 made up to look like an Abrams tank for training purposes.

I hoped you had died a long time ago

.50 yuan has been deposited into your bank account Little Brother Chen. The people's republic thanks you, but reminds you: Taiwan IS THE REAL CHINA!

Apr 15, 1989 – Jun 4, 1989
六四事件
八九民运
Tiananmen Square protests of 1989


enjoy your internet privileges being revoked.

you can just nigger rig it into the side like what Russian did with their new T-72

Attached: 15056156301010.jpg (1412x794, 362K)

Old tanks with upgrades are cute.

Attached: T-62M Syria.jpg (1965x1224, 1005K)

the usual, that is to say pretty much anything that isnt the front. Probably has a weak gun mantlet and lover glacis too.

While you being retart, chinese tanks still lack any kind of side armor - ERA, slat armor. applique - NOTHING but rubber fagskirts.

You have great taste.

Attached: 3042349_original.jpg (1680x1260, 241K)

This, even T-90/T-72 have those small ERA panel in the side.

Attached: 14522550000520.jpg (1280x960, 299K)

t-72 hit barrier or wall.

That tank is naked, put some ERA on for gods sake.

Now they cover most of the side.

Attached: tank_t90si-bzqhcgtq-1523868412.jpg (832x597, 95K)

but i like lewd

Attached: wasuaSd.jpg (3597x2400, 895K)

And more ERA can be trapped onto that new skirt

Attached: 15019968450142.jpg (1280x720, 328K)

That's very lewd, I wanna see a lewd T-14.

I already have a bottom less T-14 pic. Do you have topless one?

That T-90 have a air conditioner on the side of the turret.

Attached: file.png (1024x683, 611K)

Forget pic

Attached: 4XY1Q4PGdtU.jpg (1600x900, 232K)

I am short on informative T-14 pictures sadly

Attached: T-55AM.jpg (1590x1193, 851K)

>Whats are the weak points on China's new tank?

All of it,

I have some skirtless pic. I would kill someone for a naked turret pic.

Attached: Xx2oZJdumXA.jpg (1662x1232, 574K)

>enjoy your internet privileges being revoked.
kek

It's biggest weakpoint is the fact that it's chinese.
Seriously, didn't these things fall apart at some tank competition?

Chinese people are in it.

Made in China. Land of the almost-right.

For some reason this new wheel arrangement looks better and maybe more western than what they do usually on their T-XXs

Attached: t-14 turret (1).jpg (2186x1903, 159K)