Glock. Perfection

it fired when he picked it up so he pulled the trigger when pciking it up that's dumb

Its like glocks don't actually have a safety huh.

He grabbed it before it had come to a complete rest, and pulled the trigger. Like a fucking moron.

Trigger safeties Arnt safeties.

Glocks, revolvers, DA/SA guns, and DAO guns. AKA most handguns.

Fuck off niglet.

>Law enforcement professionals.

Your lives are in good hands citizens!

>TRIGGER SAFETY IS FINE JUST DON'T PULL THE TRIGGER

Attached: 1385579329143.png (326x285, 99K)

>pull the trigger
>weapon fires
OH WOW MUCH SHIT, SO UNSAFE! Kys faggot, only an idiot relies on a mechanical safety.

well this retard is fired

>probably drinking
>carrying on a place where majority of sales are alcohol
>shoots someone
>doesn't even render aid
Chances FBI sweeps this under the rug and he just gets a suspension?

>FBI doing Fortnite Dances.

Maybe Trump is on to something...when the FBI needs an extensive internal review. Basically use PUBG vs Fortnite as the metric to determine who gets fired.

Anybody remember that one anti gun sheriff who said civilians should never own even handguns because they lack training...

...and then shot himself in the leg when field stripping a glock to clean it?

Or just fire every moron who falls for the battle royale cancer

>not having a safety
>picking it up by the trigger
>not having the decency to check on the guy you shot
fucking cops, man

>imblying

Thicc country milfs are my fetish

>Trigger safeties Arnt safeties.
So he stuck his finger inside the trigger guard without the intention to shoot? I don't do things like that because I'm a safe person.

...nobody mentioned that he was a civilian?

According to the 9th circuit, police officer deserves guns more effective than the common people hence why cops can have exception to the CA DOJ Handgun list.

>gun fires after trigger is pulled
>fucking glocks pieces of shit

Attached: 12087676467.jpg (220x232, 5K)

Suhn, do you know what civilian means?

Don't let them fool you

Unpopular opinion inbound - I truly don't blame him for accidentally pulling the trigger. He panicked and scrambled for it without thinking and pulled it. The part thats stupid is he didn't check the person he shot.

Attached: sigsour.webm (640x360, 1.15M)

It went off as it came out of the holster when he was upside down glock fags on sucide watch

>muh tigger pull with authority
>muh gun points right at my ephemeral artery
>muh draw

I guess you are blind AND stupid.

Attached: fag.gif (220x165, 7K)

this guy was obviously intoxicated

So how many felonies is that? Two? Three?

How did the human race fucking survive the age of the DA revolver, I swear

Y...yes? Are you a fucking retarded ape? How difficult is it to avoid sticking your finger in something? Do you also have plastic covers on all your outlets because otherwise you might stick a fork in one by accident?

>gaston damage control

>I'm a retard, the post
Don't put your finger on the curved bit that makes it go bang, and it won't go bang. How is this difficult?

I bet you carry with your gun unloaded and the magazine in the car. For safety. Because you might ND.

10 lb triggers in double action mode. Definitely not some tacticool >3lb trigger pull for maximum tac sack waving.

Here we have video evidence that it is indeed difficult to grab a hand shaped object without putting your finger in the part that is deigned for a finger.
Maybe you only carry your gun to the range in a hardcase. Maybe you only carry the gun to your car and then you sit in your desk job wage slaving. Maybe some people actually go outside and a safety that only works if you don't pull the trigger isn't a good idea.

lb trigger pull
>>
?

You wouldn't have nearly as much fine motor skill in a stressful situation as you think you would. And anyway if you did, something as simple as operating a safety wouldn't be a problem for a tier 1 operator such as you now would it?

That's why glocks are the single most common hard use duty pistol for LEOs and military, right?

Yeah it's totally not because of marketing tactics and lobbying because companies wouldn't do that

Unpopular opinion inbound- doesn't this reinforce the case for carrying a Glock in condition 3? Pulling an idiot move like this seems more likely for the average person than needing the extra second to rack a slide in a lot of hypothetical confrontations

Attached: hzmN3yaA4qn75JmyRxoTqD2jqlLQtJeynTv-SmBiufM.jpg (315x766, 64K)

>Implies fine motor skills would go to shit
>Implies adding manual safeties would improve the situation in which motor skills have gone to shit

Welp, you might just be retarded.

Oh boy. A low cost minimal training required pistol is somehow popular with the pig force and third world conscription/underfunded europoor nations? Who woulda thunked? The advetisers at Glock arn't retarded. They knew if they wanted a marker share higher than what hipoint currently had they had to be jews. They made sure a full armorers course was available to these organizations before they hit the market, they made sure they could tantalize these penny pinchers with trade in shekels.

BS there's no way the gun was moving with enough force to depress the trigger even if he did grab it while moving. He swept in a panic, and hooked the trigger like a retard

Yea, im sure the reason special forces and high budget tac teams from around the world increasingly choose to carry glocks over H&Ks and sigs is because of the marketing and low price. Your bullshit quip about them being bad for real world use is laughably delusional. Glock haters are literally worse than glock fags.

no we have evidence that fucking morons with spastic levels of coordination shouldn't fuck around with guns while drunk. also that you're apparently one of them because you leap to their defense due to your innate inability to keep your finger off the fucking trigger, you pants shitting retard.

>round 2 of fuddo baits a ND thread regarding condition 3
At least use slightly different wording, it's a little too obvious.

Wow, tell me about how much special forces use their handguns and how big of an advantage glock gives them over HK or Sig

Which handgun has the best manual safety?

yeah, just like marsoc, the seal teams and apparently ace do as well. but they're all less well trained than elite guys like you, who dedicate themselves to getting to the range once a month and regularly re-watch heat and zero dark thirty.

wow, tell me now how you can support your argument after admitting that tier one operators choose glock?

>missing the point this fucking badly
>calling someone retarded
As expected of a glocktard

Come to Jow Forums

>Guns need to be manually safe without a round chambered.

Not what I was expecting.

>defending a guy picking up a gun by the trigger because the gun is """unsafe"""
day/k/are is here

Well the Webster dictionary says mil, police and firefighters. But to me if they dont want to be civilians so bad then they need to be reminded of the restrictions of the constitution of the US that was outlined by the people. So shall not be infringed, due process and all that.

I'm not defending them. I'm pointing out that glocks are far from perfection and are actually pretty terrible every day carries. I truly don't care what happens to the glow in the dark niggers.
We can apply this "moronic, spastic, and drunk coordination" to every pistol and the glock will routinely ND more than the others because of its design flaws.

Attached: GlockClaymore.jpg (640x527, 137K)

>hey you can have any handgun you want
>surprise me
>ta da
>hundreds of $ saved
>Glock perfection

it's summerfag airshitters and hipsters that carry cz's

>moving the goal posts this hard
Your desperate damage control is delicious. But why not answer your question since it's such a simple one? It's because they do just as good of a job as their previous issue sidearms when it comes to hard use but with better size/weight efficiency. Why carry around a hunk of metal thats noticeably larger and heavier all day every day while offering zero benefits when you don't have to? The same logic is what makes it such an objectively good handgun for civilians or police.

makes you think

thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/06/kat-ainsworth/video-holstered-pistol-discharges-negligent-or-accident/

>does a backflip while carrying
>picks gun up by trigger
What kinds of retards does the FBI hire?

Literally nepotism.

no, you're so fucking stupid that you can't even understand the very concept of a negligent discharge, because if you did you couldn't ascribe something that is due to negligence, to a design flaw. you contradicted yourself without even realizing.

fuck off somewhere and eat some paint. that's about your level.

actually, marsoc ditched their race guns for glock 19s in an operator lead decision. they were leaving their 1911s on the shelf and buying glocks.

and you still blew yourself the fuck out.

>FBI
>"cops"
Federal fags, get out
t.cop

m8 I just replied to you didn't set any goal posts. I honestly carry a G19 most days, glocks are absolute God tier for a gun you plan to carry but not use. They're certainly functional but I have a half dozen handguns I'd rather use in a firefight

But like most people who carry a handgun, I've got it just in case not because I intend to use it

kys and your boss pig

A gun lacking a safety is a design flaw
A gun being discharged when it was not intended is a ND

The first one could of prevented the second one. But keep the ad hominems coming broski.

Attached: Glock working.gif (419x286, 1.47M)

>it is indeed difficult to grab a hand shaped object without putting your finger in the part that is deigned for a finger.
Yeah. It's difficult to avoid doing backflips while you're carrying drunk too.

Attached: 1515824211001.png (645x730, 27K)

Yea but you can handle it because youre the FBI

Wow. Those folks are really lucky the fed didn't claim they shot at him first and burn the whole place down with all the children inside.

>A gun lacking a safety is a design flaw
Design choice. It has both benefits and negatives as opposed to a manual safety and ergo is not purely a flaw.
>A gun being discharged when it was not intended is a ND
>A gun being discharged when it was not intended to and through negligent behavior of the discharging person is a ND
FTFY

youtu.be/uGT-eg3dfTU

Look at 1:18

Look at the troll face this guy makes. He's just going away full of shame ! He doesn't even check if nobody was hurt !
Also that fucking fortnite dance : the fbi plays fucking fortnite.

Flash looks fake but still funny and hope the local cops showed up and harassed him.

>Guy yesterday shot his dick off when he bent down appendix carry on a glock
>Guy today shoots someone when he picks up a glock
Can't Make This Shit Up. Loving every laugh, you glock fags deserve it.

Attached: 1486791479241.jpg (653x477, 191K)

Even though negligence should be disencouraged, a tool with features that protect the user (and others) from his own stupidity is better than one that doesn't. Pretty much every other tool is designed in line with this philosophy. Imagine a circular saw with no blade cover.

If the gun had a safety this wouldn't happen. It doesn't fucking matter if the guy was an idiot or not, what matters is that the victim wouldn't have a hole in the leg right now.

dude it happens. Glock owners just aren't pussies who are afraid to take one in the leg

>Glock owners just aren't pussies who are afraid to take one in the dick
ftfy

>gun has safety
>guy carries with safety disengaged for high speed low drag
A double action trigger, maybe. Didn't NYC make cops use like a 9 pound trigger in their glocks because they kept NDing?

Yankees with guns Issue #3142394721938318.

How hard is it to slowly and deliberately holster your gun?

If you're holstering a gun, shouldn't it be low stress situation where you can take your time?

Just don't pick up your gun by the trigger with your eyes closed, people.

Hypothetically, what if you see someone else going for the gun? Or you're already in a fight?

>picks it up by the trigger
>Serious dancing with your gun

this guy is a fucking disaster

Not him, but you probably shouldn't be holstering your gun or closing your eyes and picking it up by the trigger if somebody is going for a gun.

Then don't holster your gun. If you accidentally fire while picking it up after dropping it, that's one less bullet to shoot your enemy with at worst.

surprised he didn't put a round down the crack
of his ass too.
wonder waht his BAC was at the time
>don't blame the tool when it's the operator

>blur his face
Why

FBI fails at trigger discipline. How many threads we need about this?

Attached: disco cops.jpg (1508x2027, 2.15M)

Clearly not "at the worst", considering this goober put a bullet in a bystander's leg even without the threat of an assailant. A gun going off when you don't intend it to is not "one less bullet", that's a bullet going somewhere you didn't intend it to go. This man could very well have ended an innocent person's life

I mean a negligent discharge into a wall in your own house or some shit is one thing but to do it careless drunk is another. Jesus.

Legitimate self defense.

they originally asked for heavier triggers, but the stated reason was to try to replicate the DA pull weight of the old revolvers they were transitioning from.

he pulled the trigger and the gun just went off...what the fuck...how do glockfags defend this?? thumb and grip safeties should be mandatory on all firearms, especially assault pistols where an inexperienced gun owner (which is most of them due to how insanely easy it is to get a firearm in this country) could easily accidentally fire multiple shots due to the weapons being automatic.