You know autistic savants? Those people that can master a single skill and become fucking professors and shit on it. Why do we not find autists that are obsessed with shooting and put them into designated marksman role? What could go wrong? Autists like that rainman guy from that movie who could do incredible maths in his head in a few seconds.
You know autistic savants? Those people that can master a single skill and become fucking professors and shit on it...
Other urls found in this thread:
ktnv.com
twitter.com
Because you don't need a super-autist to hit something with a bullet.
Shooting does not require "incredible maths".
Just quik maths
>why don't we force mentally disabled people into a military role with extreme responsibility and physical demands
Go back to your videogames, kiddo.
>teach autists how to kill people
Isn’t that what Jow Forums is for already?
Skrrat, skidi-kat-kat
Boom
It's an interesting idea and you're not wrong for asking the question, but it just isn't practical. The job is way less about shooting and way more about interpersonal interaction and having a diverse array of skills. It isn't immediately evident, but a good soldier in a modern army is competent at a lot of seemingly unrelated tasks, to the point where career success requires being a jack of all trades to some extent.
Could something like this work if modern armies were structured differently? Maybe, but they'd have to be very different pretty much from initial entry training on up. This kind of one-trick autistic superspecialist just isn't supported with the way things are done now.
Emotional resilience is also a major concern with this.
Like adjusting for drop 100 meters away from 33 stories up.
Guess why you don't see a lot of rainmen at the casinos. It's the same reason you don't see a lot of them in bootcamp.
Hint: it's called reality.
Do you want war crimes? Because that's how you get war crimes...
Were they even bump-stocks? Those look like regular gen 3 and 4 stocks to me
>Why do we not find autists that are obsessed with shooting
So what, Nutnfancy types?
1. The correct term is idiot savant.
2. Shooting requires hand eye coordination. Nothing more.
And if you had an autistic supergenius, you wouldn't want to waste him by having him get shot at. You'd want him running something important somewhere behind the lines.
Not every single gun had a bump-stock on it. There are pictures of the other guns which did have bump-stocks and you can very clearly see that they are bump-stocks.
He had 47 guns in his room, by the way. So it's not weird that not every single one would have a bump-stock on it.
>Shooting requires hand eye coordination. Nothing more.
Hand/eye coordination will do you no good if you do not know your come-ups.
autistic people, even high functioning and mild ones, lack fine motor control.
t. sperg
because we dont want another gomer pyle situation
Because they can find non autists that will do it. Why the fuck would anyone want to work with our spend the money to train some retard who can "shoot gud" when you can find a regular dude to do the same thing
I’m autistic and I’m fine
t. Aspergers
Savants are no more or less likely to have autism. The only reason autistic savants are noticed is because the conflict between the perceived abilities of the mentally ill and their actual abilities--most autistic people struggle through their lives.