Serious question, why is it that it seems that all the pro-fun states (and some countries) have a higher crime rate than the no-fun ones? You know, Alaska vs California, shit even Tennessee is higher than Massachusetts or Hawaii. The argument "yes but there are other influencing factors other than gun laws" always seems like a cop-out argument.
Pic unrelated
Serious question...
it's a recent phenomenon related to the rural meth epidemic, if you look at the historical data it's not there before 2000.
You have no power here.
Non-whites.
Do your pro fun states include
>angry natives
>poor people
>or large populations of niggers?
(If so you may be entitled to financial compensation)
But seriously, these anti gun state are populated by faggots, liberals, pussies and retards. These kind of people dont commit crimes nearly as much as the people mentioned above.
Mexico has incredibly strict gun control laws which is why violent crime in Mexico is so amazingly rare compared to the US
Poor people are more likely to commit crime
>these anti gun states
In larger cities might fudge statistics or not accurately report crimes to make it look like there has being a reduction in crime is taking place to get more city money for dem programs. Number fudging official numbers on crime is nothing new.
Like when NYPD threw a tantrum and stopped working for a few days because the mayor said something they didn't like. Crime went down dramatically because they weren't out looking for it. Life went on.
Ok this stuff about poor rurals, meth and fudged statistics makes a lot of sense
Sorry for the shit thread but my faith was wavering