Beretta .40 90 two

just picked up one of these puppies
anyone have any experience with Berettas?

Attached: Beretta_90TWO_closed.jpg (1200x797, 207K)

Other urls found in this thread:

lmgtfy.com/?q=beretta 90-two
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>.40

That frame and grip look retarded

>how can we compete with the Five-seveN?
>the uh... 90... two
No experience with these, they just seem like a plastic tacticool frame on a 92FS. But Berettas in general are about the best DA/SA pistols in my experience.

Some people hate on the .40 S&W, which I don't really get, seems like an alright cartridge.

>frame

Attached: 1526429223898.jpg (205x244, 34K)

Great reliable guns.
I can’t shoot them to save my life

Berettas suck donkey cock get a Glock 19 and shut the fuck up OP

I had a 96 and it was the shit

good gun OP.

if I were you i'd get some thin polymer grip panels, and get some mecgar hi capacity mags.

Cry more glockfag

>get a Glock 19
What if he wants a double action so he doesn't pop somebody in the leg while breakdancing?

>straight outta 1998.jpg
what the fuck am I looking at?

Attached: 1495587153400.jpg (1280x1024, 456K)

lmgtfy.com/?q=beretta 90-two

>.40

Attached: IMG_20170213_193040.jpg (2500x1875, 1.38M)

Attached: IMG_20170213_192403.jpg (2500x1875, 1.39M)

Do a back flip before you aim your Glock, and pull the trigger. Can a Beretta get you out of attempted murder?

The double action trigger ensures it would negligently discharge at chest height instead of foot level, so it wouldn't be "attempted."

I want to see a dance routine that incorporates a safety toggle.

>"-gun sucks"
>proceeds to shill for the shittiest, soulless, most ugly fucking handgun ever

Pottery

Attached: 1527965675044.png (500x500, 580K)

>they just seem like a plastic tacticool frame on a 92FS

It has an alloy frame like the rest of the 90-series pistols.

Attached: E4.jpg (640x480, 197K)

>ugliest handgun ever

Hi-Point and USFA would like to have a word with you

Im not sure Im on board with this.

There're a few of us on this board that own these. They're good guns like the rest of the model line. It has more features than a regular FS or M9. It didn't sell well because people like thought that it was plastic and the looks of the gun were divisive. Beretta took some of the innovations of the 90-Two and made the A1 versions so that they had the updates of the 90-Two, but the classic 92 lines. Still, some ideas from the 90-Two wouldn't be seen again until the M9A3 which would eclipse the 90-Two in all-out features nearly a decade later. If you drop in a threaded barrel and night sights, there's nothing an M9A3 can do that the 90-Two can't at a much cheaper price.

Also, since you have a .40 model, you have the option of getting a 9mm barrel and shoot a different cartridge. The differences between the 9mm and .40 versions are few so you can shoot 9mm with just a barrel swap. You can even use the .40 mags and it'll still feed just fine. The only weird thing is that the ejection is more straight upward so you may catch a hot casing on your arm or forehead.

Should have got a 96 or better yet a 92

>.40
wouldn't it be a 90six then?

Looks like the rape baby of a beretta and a hi point

all I know is that it's more similar to a 92A1 than any other 92
it's also has a weird captive guide rod that doesn't fit in other 92s except the 92A1

No. The naming scheme was meant to imply a second generation of 90-Series pistols because of all the upgrades they've made over the FS.

the "almost px4"
it's fine, 40 is good in it.