Is this chart accurate?

Is this chart accurate?

Attached: Spring.Summer.Small01.png (2671x1382, 3.34M)

Attached: Winter.Fall.Small01.png (2671x1383, 3.71M)

Florida I think is wrong.. IDK what one id pick for it. But I think it needs something with more brown.

We have saw palm fields, pine forest, cypress forest than swamp. Everything besides the saw palm puts the foliage of things above your head besides maybe ferns and grasses that are thigh height at best.

Any suggestion of rhoddiememe shitsmear should be discarded.

colorado is wrong too this is dumb AF.
>forest
>prairie
>mountains
and also why is this a thing. super gay gearfag shit

Seems good except for the southernmost portion of AZ and NM should also be browner as well. Excluding the small patches of greener camo that represents the Madrean sky island mountains ranges, those are fine.

Looks like you put put a lot of effort into this bait.
Did you pick random camouflages off of camopedia and played with paint.net?

utah is weird. we can be in desert or mountains within 20 minutes.

It's fine. Wyoming can be pic related within 30 minutes of dense lodgepole pines.

Attached: IMG_2547.jpg (280x210, 8K)

Literally a 30 minute drive from Killpecker Sand Dunes

Attached: big-sandy-trailhead2.jpg (900x675, 203K)

Most of the mountain states are like this actually, even here in hell (aka AZ).

Attached: Meteor Crater and San Francisco Peaks.jpg (2736x2052, 589K)

other side of that same mountain range around summer time

Attached: San Francisco Peaks, Arizona.jpg (2048x1385, 1.03M)

No. If you were to grade it for accuracy would make a lousy F.

Arizona's latitude and elevation differentiation is quite comfy in the winter. In Wyoming you can't find a respite from from the cold, while you can ski and bask in the sun within a few hours of each other in AZ.

cadpat isn't bad for my neck of the woods but leaves a bit to be desired, swfl.

Attached: IMG_5139.jpg (3024x4032, 1.76M)

It's the best you'll get for a general map and it was done quite recently. Of course there are specific regional differences but this is the most you can get out of a map like that.
Multi cam tropic is fine for non specific areas

For SoCal, no.

>SoCal
>desert tiger
>when multicam is a thing
No throw it away.

Ayy

Rhodesian brushstroke is definitely not right on that map. It’s probably more useful in South America or heavy Bush with lots of green. It’s not practical in the states really, it’s just a cool camo.

I live in the part of SC that recomends flektarn, and, yeah, I'd use flektarn here. Hope that helps OP.

How many times do you have to spam this fucking thread?

South of Spokane on the WA/ID border M81 woodland works better than either woodland marpat or w/e the other one is.

It’s so they can use these trash reposts to push down good threads and make sure bait stays near the top.

>M81 and OD is obsolete and thus useless
>rhodie camo and alpenflage are fine tho

Fuck right off.

Attached: 14194383_1841336426094838_424372341_n.png.jpg (714x960, 51K)

What's urban camo good for?

Attached: 1357032073305.jpg (160x119, 5K)

Multicam is right for a lot of the midwest. It works real well with all our corn fields

JGSDF camo should be in the North East. It's like flectarn, but better cuz it's not basically black at a distance. Weeb out.

Forgot pic.

Attached: perfect green.jpg (3264x2448, 2.62M)