V22 Osprey based on Weserflug P.1003

And the Rocketdyne F-1 shares almost no heritage with the V2's engine aside from both being gas-generator cycle liquid fueled engines.

hmmm... Seems more like an MP5 to me...

Attached: STG44.jpg (1024x733, 247K)

I wonder why they changed it so much.
Like they wanted those heavy and clumsy optic mounts.

Attached: AK-46.png (838x961, 623K)

MP5 uses a smaller roller-delayed blowback system lifted straight from the G3, which was based on the STG 45 and Gerät 06H. The MP44 shares more in common with the ZB26 and FAL, mainly due to those using tilting bolts.

>receiver attachment is similar
>internal mechanism is still completely different
Totally the same, right?

the F-1 was shit anyways. thats why they canned it and replaced it with a german designed engine.

you have no idea what the F-1 was do you?

Nigger what?

the F-1 rocket engine is widely accepted to be an absolute failure outside of the USA. they couldnt even finish the engines because the engineers couldnt figure out how to optimize them, this was proven by NASA attempting to recreate the engine. the Saturn-5 was powered by german engines that were shipped in after the american engineers couldnt figure out liquid fuel rockets. NASA then proceeded to cover this up.

Attached: 1450258643721.png (540x530, 137K)

im not going to spoonfeed you. look it up.
of course, you will have to translate the pages you do find since all american pieces on the F-1 are pure propaganda.

translation: "I made this shit up"

whatever helps you sleep at night.

No proof still?

i already said im not going to spoonfeed you. we already did that enough with your space program. yet it was all for naught as the russians still BTFO you.

nonono, at least one of your points is wrong. He wasn't talking about the M1 Abrams, but the M4 Abrams!

>of course, you will have to translate the pages you do find since all american pieces on the F-1 are pure propaganda

It means you have no proof.

>the F-1 rocket engine is widely accepted to be an absolute failure outside of the USA
Widely accepted by whom? I just checked the German and Russian wikis and they don't mention it at all.

typical american, unable to do any form of research outside of wikipedia and vox.
stop eating up propaganda and think for yourself.

Well, you said "Widely accepted". That means that it's a common opinion outside of the U.S. If that isn't in the Wikipedia pages edited by those people, then you're going to have to give a source.

Wikipedia is frequently monitored by ameriboo mods, so youre going to have to look outside your little bubble.

Wypierdalaj debilu.

Wikipedia often cites actual sources so clicking on the link or going to a library to find the books in question is not out in the realm of fiction.

Then again the retard is spewing facts out of his asshole.

What fucking drug are you on? 0 evidence of this anywhere.

Attached: 1539304051976.png (600x600, 17K)

You are fucking retarded to think that Wikipieda is American only. There are other languages and other communities that monitor Wikipieda for dumb shit idiocy like you and excise it so you cannot contaminate the world with your inbred retardation.

To where then? You claimed it was a common opinion outside of the United States yet this has never come up and you're unable to provide a source.
That's just what's written in the article though, and that isn't mentioned in either of the wiki articles.

I tell you what, I've whored all across this big blue ball of ours, and hands down the best whores are Russian whores.

FATHER

THE SLEEPER HAS AWOKEN

extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence

but in all honesty, its better to release these apparently existing documents and be accused of spoonfeeding rather than to hold on to sekrit documents as a point of pride
the point is to provide the data and disseminate it as wide as possible, in order that people be able to decide for themeselves

even non-wiki sources simply state that the F1 is the most powerful rocket engine, it took us to the moon, it had problems which were ironed out, and by the apollo missions was very safe

>hands down the best whores are Russian whores
Sorry I don't want to get AIDS...

me likey

No F-1 has ever failed to lift a payload into orbit. No rocket powered by them ever failed to reach orbit. Considering that all Saturn Vs ever launched never failed to send their payloads and human crew is something no one else has come close to doing so.

the saturn V has over 5 million components
even if it was 99% reliable, there would still have over 5000 defects

during its launch, not a single defect was detected, and none affected its launch
it is as close to humanly possible as 100% perfect

It proves that Nazis can't ever finish what they start.

>V22 Osprey based on Weserflug P.1003
Tiltwing=/=tiltrotor. A better comparison would be the earlier XC-142
>AK47 based on StG44
No, it’s based on the M1 Garand.
>Grease Gun based on MP40
What the fuck? There’s no source I could find that supports this.
>M4 Abrams based on Leopard 2
Again, what the fuck? How are the abrams and leopard 2 the same?
>B2 based on Ho229
Northrop started development of flying wing aircraft independently of the Germans prior to the war. The Ho 229s stealth characteristics were purely coincidental.
>Jet Engines based on Me 262
The first jet turbine engines were developed outside of Germany decades before the Me 262.

Carrier warfare

>Anything the world didn't steal from the Germans?
Functional government

>No, it’s based on the M1 Garand.
I'm not even in this shitfest and I can tell your retarded.

The AK's bolt is very similar to the Garand

Combustion instabilities during apollo 10 caused oscillations so strong thry nearly tore the rocker apart. The crew had a very rough ride. All other apollo missions had 'pogo' problems as well, there were very good reasons why F1 like engines were subsequently discarded in favor of Russian like high pressure combined cycle engines.

its less retarded than saying its based on the STG

Yeah he’s retarded when the kalashnikov carries over many mechanical aspects of the garand

all modern weapons originate from Chinese gunpowder, abrams and ak-47 are stolen from chinese technology

Impressive

Chani, get out the big amplifiers to do the weirding way, this ones ears are closed ...

Attached: hotglass.jpg (800x600, 64K)

By your logic, the STG-44 is a copy of the SVT-40.