Why don't we see more terrorist groups training suicide dogs to run up to the enemy and explode?
Why don't we see more terrorist groups training suicide dogs to run up to the enemy and explode?
Other urls found in this thread:
dogster.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Because you're mostly dealing with over zealous, low IQ cave dwellers with critical thinking skills on par with said dog
Because in Islam, dogs are Haram.
But apparently fucking your cousin for the thirtieth generation in a row isn't.
How did Afghanistan make a dog breed?
>Today's modern purebred breed of Afghan Hound descends from dogs brought to Great Britain in the 1920s which King Amanullah of the Afghan Royal Family gave away as gifts.[2] Some had been kept as hunting dogs, others as guardians.[3]
>Although the breed is demonstrably ancient, verifiable written or visual records that tie today's Afghan Hound breed to specific Afghan owners or places are absent.
Also they are literally the dumbest dogs on the entire planet.
dogster.com
So great example Poohammed.
I'm pretty sure it's only Haram to eat dogs user, not to touch or own them. Unless I'm completely misunderstanding what Haram means, fuck muslims either way.
Dogs aren't haram, but they're considered like on the same level as livestock, so you're not supposed to let them inside your house, and you should wash your hand after patting them. Shit like that.
It's easier to train their women to do it.
dogs aren't haram you fucking mouthbreather.
>literally the dumbest
If you had actually read the link you would have noticed that they are stated to be one of the most intelligent. You are a retard.
Because dogs don't go to heaven.
Because A. if they were smart enough to train dogs they wouldn't be picking a fight with a NATO nation
and B. the Soviets already tried it. Ended up blowing up their own tanks.
They have been known to stuff IED's into dead dogs if that counts.
Because there's people waiting in line to get their suicide vests on who don't need hours of training on its operation, I also have a feeling few soldiers would hesitate to shoot an approaching dog on sight especially if it's seemingly carrying something
>the Soviets already tried it. Ended up blowing up their own tanks.
That's because they used their own tanks for the dogs to practice on, they should have used captured German tanks instead.
They developed this in the 1930's. And only used it at the start of the invasion. So "captured german tanks" were not really around.
Dude what?
Right, because there's a surplus of M1 Abrams lying around the middle east.
Even dogs know they're better dead than red.
Stop fucking a goat for 10 seconds and read the article again. Carefully this time.
>Unless I'm completely misunderstanding what Haram means
It's complicated but basically they just hate dogs in general and won't touch them
because the Germans showed it was a bad idea back in WWII
correction: The soviets did. They killed more of their own men and blew up more of their own tanks than they did Germans. en.wikipedia.org