Canada General - Boycott Al Flaherty's Edition

There are a lot of gun owners here in Toronto, buddy. Most just stay quiet about it because they don't want to get dogpiled.

Random rarely ever means random in law enforcement. Look at how certain people get "randomly" chosen for searches at airports.
I even know a horsey cop who is "randomly" searched every single time he's at the airport, even when on official business due to [random].
Literally would just create a system where they can excuse even more bullshit unwarranted searches and say "uh well it was random!"
Absolutely ridiculous for the owner of a gun shop to even suggest it, even if he's looking at it from an honest perspective.

You'd think, but these people are among us.
youtube.com/watch?v=EHIKEHCXfjU&feature=youtu.be&t=25

yah just wait till they no knock someone that didnt get them memo and is a paranoid fuck. also the lottery would likely be limited to melopolitain areas unofficially.

I honestly don't think police want to go door to door.

I'd be scared to.

>random checks
Excuse my ignorance, but don't the cops need a warrant to enter and search a residence ?

Attached: 1539518651786.jpg (900x563, 34K)

Thinking of picking up a Bergara HMR in 308 for target shooting and the occasional hunt. Should i? Are they good

When you have firearms they can technically schedule an appointment with you to check your shit, and during that check the chief firearms officer is more or less allowed to look at, or in anything that "may contain a firearm". Which if you ask me is already a horrible violation of privacy that can be abused as it is. Adding a "random" lottery would just give them more excuse to "randomly" go fishing at someones house.
The only case I've heard of it being put into practice though, was that dude who was registering and slanging a load of AR lowers, and contrary to idiots online, they were investigating as to if he was running and unlicensed firearms business.

It would be interesting to see how many cops are R/PAL holders

Attached: 1540117873727.jpg (960x948, 90K)

1. The owner of Al Flaherty's wants an exception to that rule.

2(a). Technically speaking, under currently existing law, the cops can already check the storage conditions of your firearms without a warrant. However, they still have to send you a letter, and you have to schedule a time that works for both of you. This isn't a warrant in the legal definition of the word, even though it's functionally similar.

2(b). Under the current law, the cops need to have some kind of reason to search your home like this. Usually it's if you possess more than 10 firearms (that THEY know of, ie. Restricted), if you're suspected of a crime, if you're a licensed Collector, etc. Al Flaherty's wants a "regional lottery system" to be one of these reasons.

Probably not a lot.

>schedule an appointment
I understand that. Even though I don't like the idea of checking up on me, it's a lot better than the police just randomly coming to my house and saying "open up"

What makes you say that? Most cops use firearms in their line of work (except for the ones who are stuck in the office everyday, but even then). Last I checked, you still need an RPAL to possess & use firearms supplied by your employer.

Whether they own personal firearms for personal use is a different story, though.

>Last I checked, you still need an RPAL to possess & use firearms supplied by your employer.
The police do not.

I can accept that I was wrong, but that's ridiculous. Civilians need a license to own/use firearms, but the people who use them the most don't have to. Makes sense.

Agreed.
Honestly this is rustling my jimmies far too much, it's just a stupid concession that that owner of Al's doesn't seem to mind. Just pisses me off that that someone in his position would suggest such a system that at best, in a perfect world, would be another inconvenience and pain in the ass for gun owners and at worst would be a system that's rife for abuse.
And we're a country that's been fucked over thanks to specific people given a voice (ie OFAH in '94 supporting C-68 because it "dun have to do with huntin ryefuls'")
Oh well, I get the feeling he's more or less killed off his business with that one sentence, either that or just going to back solely catering to fudds. I wonder if he can pay his bills selling 200 boxes of .303 and 12 gauge during durr season.
>only need five rounds, three to sight the ryeful in and two fur the durr.

That is why if you get stopped by cops or fish cops and you have firearms you always ask if they have a license if they ask to see your guns. If they don't, do not let them handle them as you dont have to, I personally dont let unlicensed people handle my firearms and it's no different if it's the police. They can SEE them but not touch them.

That's pretty clever. And if you have them bring a PAL-holding supervisor, he might chew them out for not knowing about firearms law.

Fuck Al Flaherty's and all the fudds trying to throw everyone under the bus. Those faggots are on my never buy from list now

thegunblog.ca/2018/10/23/al-flahertys-sent-this-letter-to-government-on-gun-ban-review/?fbclid=IwAR1AjDn3QFWA0K5d9vlG7DxueKx4GQoVkM6lM77cavUYjlUEo55-u55nOlU

You guys see this shit?

Al Flaherty's over Domenic Saverino's answer to gun crime is to throw legal owners under the bus with "Random Storage Checks".

Fuck that guy

Send an email in and let them know you're not shopping at a place that throws their customers under the bus.

Not trying to be a fag but police are civilians.

Good idea.

Im emailing them now.

>thegunblog.ca/2018/10/23/al-flahertys-sent-this-letter-to-government-on-gun-ban-review/?fbclid=IwAR1AjDn3QFWA0K5d9vlG7DxueKx4GQoVkM6lM77cavUYjlUEo55-u55nOlU
>>So what should be done to reduce firearm crime in Canada?
>>Enforce current laws regarding the safe storage of firearms. This would entail random checks on individuals to ensure that firearms are stored acceding to the current legal measures.
>>Random inspections on individuals based on a lottery system for a given region.

Fuck this guy x10. Implying the issue is lost/stolen/straw purchased firearms when they're not the majority of firearms used in crimes.

Also, if the issue if straw purchasing, the new registry will handle that, no need for a need law after c71.

FUCKING BOOMERS

Attached: Liars.png (1901x931, 1.47M)

Attached: LGR.jpg (580x744, 97K)

All the more reason for them to have PALs.

>thegunblog.ca/2018/10/23/al-flahertys-sent-this-letter-to-government-on-gun-ban-review/?fbclid=IwAR1AjDn3QFWA0K5d9vlG7DxueKx4GQoVkM6lM77cavUYjlUEo55-u55nOlU
>You guys see this shit?
>Al Flaherty's over Domenic Saverino's answer to gun crime is to throw legal owners under the bus with "Random Storage Checks".
>Fuck that guy
>Send an email in and let them know you're not shopping at a place that throws their customers under the bus.

What really gets businesses stressed out are bad reviews, give them 1 star on google and let them know why. Say you'll remove the review once they withdraw the letter which supports fucking over legal owners.

friendly reminder to buy as many non registered NRs while you still can.

Attached: GovernmentTruths.png (1901x931, 1.47M)

>Ah, you see, it's not a Registry. It's a Register. That's a whole two letters of difference!

In French, it's the exact same term.

To be fair, Quebec is also the only province that still has a non-restricted registry.

>OCS phone line is down completely, now
Ayyyyy lmao
Fuck you, OCS.
Double fuck you, Canada Post.

soon they will have the entire registry tho, and im pretty sure they can share info with other provinces and feds.
Fun fact about the old registry: if your gun didnt come with a serial number they made one up on dymo label maker and expected it to stick to your oil covered gun

>if your gun didnt come with a serial number
How often does that happen? Even old-ass Mosin Nagant rifles from the late 19th/early 20th century had serial numbers.

>if your gun didnt come with a serial number they made one up on dymo label maker and expected it to stick to your oil covered gun
At least that's more humane than drilling holes & installing rivets into magazines.

old single shot shotguns, percussion rifles,

>when aztech spares your 300-500$ mags by gluing a wooden dowel inside of it
Based aztech. I've seen other valmet mags that were drilled front and back and had STEEL rivets. Or very hard aluminum as they couldn't simply be drilled out with a cordless drill.

The explanation my CFSC instructor gave was that we are taught how to safely use and store firearms while the cops are taught how to shoot people and then the justice system takes over (paraphrasing).
And then for the military, he said "they are taught how to kill people and then God sorts out the rest"

>Or very hard aluminum as they couldn't simply be drilled out with a cordless drill.
you can drill steel with a half decent bit, alum should be no problem.

also fuck those spic niggers. I tried calling them yesterday and today, both times no answer.

>And then for the military, he said "they are taught how to kill people and then God sorts out the rest"
That explains why they use the FMJ round, which is "designed" to be as humane as possible.

>lel if you wound your enemy, two more of them have to carry him away
>you've effectively neutralized three threats instead of one

Every cop in my city is. They’d tell the government to go fuck themselves

>smoking pot as an adult
Lmao

lots of milsurp had serials added for civilian sales. plenty of war bring backs had no serials. some old cooey and sears/cooeys never had serials. but ive never seen a semi auto with no serial

the same as
>drinking as an adult
now all the cool kids do mdma/shrooms/blow

>using a product that can only be legally sold to adults is being used by adults
>this is unreasonable

does amazon ship with canada post? I ordered a scope yesterday

Attached: 5162.png (510x233, 113K)

Yes.

ree. Is Canada P on strike in SW ontario?

From what I've read, the strikes are on 24-hour rotations. Toronto just extended theirs by another 24 hours. So that's another day out.

The joke is about the 'mentality' of the military.

Would you rather I get hooked on opiates? Because that's the choice I have, at this point.

daily reminder that you do not have to SMOKE marijuana to get pain relief

Attached: 1522355741964.png (2310x2147, 628K)

This. If anything, smoking is probably the least efficient way to take in THC. Vaporizing is probably the best way; it heats up the marijuana to the exact temperature needed to activate the THC (as opposed to smoking from a joint/pipe/bong, where you're straight-up setting it on fire). Edibles would be the next best way.

I don't fucking care whether I'm smoking, vaping, eating it or taking a tincture. I just want some pain relief and some god damned sleep.

>THC
The stuff I ordered has almost no THC you fucking shithead.

What's the point of using marijuana if not for the THC?

CBD.

>I don't fucking care
>god damned
>you fucking shithead
Clearly you need more weed.

I KNOW, RIGHT? GETTING MORE THAN THREE HOURS OF SLEEP A NIGHT MIGHT HELP. IF ONLY THERE WAS A THING THAT IS COMPLETELY LEGAL NOW THAT COULD HELP WITH THAT.

Then I still think there's some validity. You'd still probably get the most value out of it by not burning it.

Melatonin?

Which is still completely irrelevant when THE DAMNED THING WON'T SHIP.

It's not relevant to Canada Post's Job (in)Action, but it's very much relevant to your health.

And to be frank, I care more about you than some garbage union scumbags.

Edibles are the best way because it extracts extra thc from within the plant and bonds fully to whatever agent you chemically bond it to, usually butter. It's why edibles get people way the fuck too stoned

Not being tired isn't what's keeping me awake. Chronic fucking pain is what's keeping me awake. When I finally manage to fall asleep, it wakes me up. I haven't had a full night of restorative sleep in years.

Oh fuck off. Feign concern somewhere else to someone else. I didn't bring up the method of consuming it and it really doesn't fucking matter when none of the methods of consuming it can be accomplished when you can't (legally) get your hands on it. Whether I turn it into a butter or smoke or vape it is 100% irrelevant until I get my fucking package.

With a compliance rate probably in the 20% range lmao
Will the CAQ overturn that silly shit?

Get well soon :)

You should sue Canada Post for delaying delivery of your medicine.

I hope marijuana can help you user. Anything but opiates

Attached: 1521171609369.png (604x516, 88K)

canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/1786755-Letter-to-the-Federal-Government

Peoples are pissed at Al on CGN

pic related has got nuttin' ti hide though!

Attached: EbinBoomers.png (1856x427, 39K)

>inhales shit fumes fermented in soda bottles
>nothing to hide
He's a braver man than I.

All the shit the gov says about gun control saving lies is just pre-text (a false reason told to hide the true motive). The true motive is to fully disarm people in accordance with the UN guidelines. Everywhere across the world, governments starting implementing the same controls around the same time (early-mid 90s). In most countries this started with a false-flag mass shooting which was used as justification. Funny how they all happened around the same time.

The point is the reasons they give are just lies to sell to normies to get them to agree to go along. I don't know what it would take to change the mood of normal people from being neutral to pro-gun, but that's what needs to happen if we are to retain our legal means of possessing firearms. Get as many people as possible interested. Remember, most people think you cannot even own a gun in Canada, they can't imagine how easy it is to get a PAL and legally keep firearms. Start talking with people and if they show any interest encourage them to take the class and get their PAL.

howtogetagun.ca/

Stay strong leafbros

Attached: chadLeafPEPE.jpg (122x124, 3K)

>The true motive is to fully disarm people in accordance with the UN guidelines.
big if true. Screencapping this post

>

Attached: hqdefault (1).jpg (480x360, 15K)

begone (((fear-monger)))

Attached: 1522420660350.png (640x640, 36K)

sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21

I doubt they'd give up their pension.

The THC goes in to the fat and your lover creates a different chemical.

That's why the high is more intense

not saying you are wrong about the (((UN)) wanting to take our guns, but in agenda 21 there is no mention of firearms

Attached: 4.jpg (551x462, 22K)

un.org/disarmament/publications/more/gfz-guidelines/

Attached: UN-Gun-Control-Guidelines.png (495x250, 41K)

Attached: UN-Gun-Control-Guidelines-2.png (519x761, 112K)

Are you fucking stupid? The end game is complete disarmament.

I doubt it's a sinister UN conspiracy, they're too inept to stop a bunch of dudes with machetes from murdering people or keep the Saudi's off the Human Rights Council.

What does make more sense though, is the gov't realizing they can't shit all over armed people. People talk about the L'ecole Polytechnique as a catalyst for our more stringent gun control, but that was in 1986. It took them until 91-94 to really get going. 5 years after such a national tragedy? They didn't give a shit. The Oka Crisis is what did it. Guys with AKs and FALs, M1 carbines, AR15s, full capacity magazines, all just decided they were done getting pushed around. Block one bridge, someone calls the cops. Get your friends from other bands to start blocking roads and bridges; the cops run and the army shows up as parts of the province grind to a standstill.

And what did we get a year after Oka? No more AKs, Galils, FALs, AR barely didn't go Prohib. The M1 carbine? Not named, but why do you think the barrel requirement for NR is 18.5" when the M1's barrel is 18" even? No more 20 and 30 round mags, no more converted autos. Register everything (the last time they did was was during WW2 to keep an eye on 'enemy aliens') and implement stricter storage requirements. Now all the cheap, effective firearms are out of reach or neutered, and there's no real way to keep anything that should be NR from being Prohib just because.

Think about that.

Attached: UN-Gun-Control-Guidelines-3.png (514x511, 93K)

Exactly, the point is to get you to a point where you cannot resist.

If you and a few dozen buddies and stop a fucking province from operating because ending it with violence would cause you to lose the moral high-ground and make you look like a fucking tyrant, they will do everything in their power to prevent you from even thinking of resisting.

Attached: UN-Gun-Control-Guidelines-4.png (517x619, 94K)

Oka would have been a slaughter if the chugs weren't armed.

All these guidelines yet still the criminals will keep their guns and use them to terrorize civilians.

The state will use the police and courts to also prevent civilians from defending themselves from criminals

Not a slaughter, just teargas, rubber bullets, and handcuffs. It would've been over quickly but because they were armed that was not an option. That's why they (or any civilians) absolutely must be disarmed.

Attached: UN-Gun-Control-Guidelines-5.png (517x699, 101K)

Attached: UN-Gun-Control-Guidelines-6-Final-Summary.png (387x799, 93K)

All the shit the gov says about gun control saving lies is just pre-text (a false reason told to hide the true motive). The true motive is to fully disarm people in accordance with the UN guidelines. Everywhere across the world, governments starting implementing the same controls around the same time (early-mid 90s). In most countries this started with a false-flag mass shooting which was used as justification. Funny how they all happened around the same time.

The UN wants

-People to think that carrying a gun is a threat to public safety
-People to think that owning a gun makes you less safe
-Less people to own guns for the purpose of self protection
-Less people to purchase guns overall, for any reason
-Guns to be registered (HELLO C-71)
-Less people people to have guns in the home for the purpose of self-protection
(Funny thing, they recognize the right of self-protection for states, but not for people)
-People to turn in their guns

Always remember, the goal is complete disarmament of the civilian population.

This will happen by using a number of methods
-Outright prohibitions with mandatory turn-ins
-Prohibitions with a grandfathering cause
ex.Canada's prohibited status license where the states melts your guns once you die (What if they disappeared after you died, or right before so? That would be a shame)
-Registering firearms which will ultimately lead to confiscation. This way if the government issues a mandate to turn in weapons, they now know where they are so you must comply or face legal consequences.
ex. Canada's Restricted Possession and Acquisition license, and with C-71, a new registry of all new firearm purchases and private sales (Most western nations have a variant of this system)

Screen-cap and share this post

Bump for mega redpill

Should I eventually get the type 81 or the new 7.62x39 wk180c?

Attached: 1540342184200.jpg (1080x1062, 359K)

>x39
Type 81.

I wouldn't get a WK-180C unless it's .223.