What does Jow Forums think about the 223 wylde chambering?

What does Jow Forums think about the 223 wylde chambering?

Attached: proof_carbon_ar_.223.jpg (560x560, 20K)

yea its pretty good

nah its pretty bad

maybe its pretty maybe

Meh.
Doubt it makes much of a difference

Attached: 1534492529506.jpg (449x642, 104K)

It's fantastically okay

I give zero fucks. Who even pays attention to the 350 new meme calibers that come out every year?

its a chambering for 5.56/223 not a new round

>.223 Wylde
>new
The only thing new here is you, obviously.

Why would I need another one of those when two perfectly serviceable options already exist?

a 5.56 chamber can already fit .223 winchester. I don't see the point of .223 wylde.

Nigger it’s literally .223/5.56. Its a middle ground between the ever so fucking slight differences in .223 and 5.56 spec chambers

>i dont know shit but ima pretend i know something to feel relevant

Attached: 0B01BD4C-12F6-442B-8925-269C0E97C77C.png (680x550, 68K)

Picked one up a while back. BCA was giving them out for free to service members for veterans day.

I haven't really noticed a difference, but there isn't any real long distance shooting around me.

>223 wylde
>new
>if i dont know it, its a meme
The absolute state of Jow Forumschimps

Attached: 6DC126D1-7477-43B9-8433-A6CB673BE98D.png (1296x1458, 217K)

git fucked, google next time

If im ordering a new barrel and they have it in .223 wylde, I'll take it. If not, i dont care much if i just go with 5.56 instead

It does nothing that a plain ass 5.56 chamber can't do.

Attached: IMG_20180802_183507.jpg (468x463, 28K)

223Wylde is a chamber I would use for an SPR or a longer range AR. If you just want a 16" or less for plinking or some target shooting, pick up a cheaper 5.56 and call it a day.

>what does Jow Forums think about 223 wylde
I dont

it sounds neat but I can't find any ammo for it. Do you just have to hand load it?

Attached: but why.gif (581x327, 3.72M)

This. You're trading reliability for precision. It's worthwhile for certain applications and inappropriate for others.

Attached: 1532563152197.jpg (896x960, 90K)

except increase accuracy because of less freebore...

I did a build using a .223 Wylde barrel from Criterion and I am extremely pleased. Allegedly .223 Wylde lets you get better accuracy from .223 while safely handling the chamber pressure of 5.56. All I know is that from my experience it shoots both extremely well.

I went with one for my 20".

Seems perfectly fine to me.

Read somewhere that 5.56mm chambering was more reliable. Any truth to this?

I don't see how it could make a rifle any more or less reliable... It's just how far up the throat is...

Attached: 223wylde.png (510x323, 65K)

Well; it DOES shoot 223, AND 556...

Dude, it’s just a chamber spec, it’s not an ammo. You can shoot any 5.56 NATO or .223 ammo in a barrel marked .223 Wylde. It’s designed to be a little tighter than a 5.56 NATO chamber, but not as tight as a .223 Remington chamber.

The only good answer ive seen so far.
It adds a tiny bit more accuracy to a slight marginally larger bullet grain choice.

If you wanna be picky about accuracy between the two

223 why-uld

Doesn't it also work for 5.56?

I have a Black Rain Ordnance stainless Wylde barrel. It shoots consistent .5moa with 69gr Federal Match. Shoots quite a bit better than all my other normal AR barrels.

I stuff whatever I want in my RB Precision built rifle. I have no complaints. It shoots decent with whatever I feed it.

.223 Wylde is a 5.56 chamber with a .223 Rem throat to the lands and grooves.

Basically, this allows longer bullets to be engaged in the lands and grooves once it a round is chambered thus increasing accuracy.

Really fucking difficult concept.

>implying anyone on /k actually shoots