Are russian weapons still considared more rugged and relable nowdays...

Are russian weapons still considared more rugged and relable nowdays? I've seen several videos where modern AR perfrom just as well as AKs and can sustain a higher consecutive round count.

Attached: 5da.jpg (1346x1079, 470K)

The only reason to own Russian firearms is because of the typical caliber they’re chambered in. Most original AK’s are either rusted to shit or their wood or receivers are warped to fuck. ARs are newer, do damn well near as good in shit conditions and have more customizing options.

Attached: 963E5E4C-2090-4F3D-9A6B-CE7DD441FAE6.jpg (1024x512, 71K)

What are the russians doing in C.A.R. that they're throwing their own journalists off rooftops? rare earth materials? oil?

Russian equipment design has historically been a mix of ease of production and rugged simplicity.
So rather than being reliable, it's cheap and easy to make in massively redundant numbers, easy to repair with your millions of spare parts, and generally performs better in their horrible weather for longer periods because the design doesn't rely on logistics and regular maintenance.

I don't know I tested every AK or AR. And if one sucks more than the other then that's not a real AK/AR and you should have used this AK/AR.

It depends

Truth. There's finer examples of both and most people with an opinion haven't used them.

ARs are pretty much peak reliability these days.

>Are russian weapons still considared more rugged and relable nowdays?
Yes.
>I've seen several videos where modern AR perfrom just as well as AKs and can sustain a higher consecutive round count.
Bullshit videos from fanboys and retards.
If you want real world performance, just look at how they perform in wars.

Must assess from an understanding, simplistic designs and systems have more common but easier to repair failures and weaknesses to compensate for. Complex systems have less failures and design weaknesses, but when they fail they do so more often catastrophically.

So, AK has issue, will piss you off but in general be mitigatable by some manner of immediate action. You also be used to doing, and not be caught off guard by doing. Worst case, you will need cannibalize part (or just grab another) from the piles around you.

High end western rifle, with polymers, bells, whistles, and lots of 'enhancements', fails on you. You spend weeks waiting for specific part, that must clear regulatory hurdles, as members of religion of peace culturally enrich your women relatives.

Russian designs are not more reliable, just more manageable trade offs for when things go to shit, and Visa card with trip to visit local gun store commando is no longer viable.

Attached: dont-worry-so-much-about-money-worry-about-if-people-29608951.png (500x303, 92K)

Shes underage
Thats a child

Makes it even better and me even harder!

Attached: 1308365763667.jpg (370x507, 43K)

So what? It's not like she's naked

>has no idea what he is talking about

no it's just there are manchildren who jerk off to a certain leftist gun reviewer that made a admittedly fake test to drum up views on his failing secondary channel


ar fanboys are the cancer of the gun world

what are
>dirty ammo issues
>hard primer ammo issues
>needing buffers depending on barrel length and ammo choice etc issues
>blowing up if their is a small amount of water in the action or gas system issues
>sand issues
>bolts designed to be replaced at 5000 rounds issue
>1 point of contact on the mag well issue where as smarter designed mags have 2
>sealed system issue, yeah it may be decently sealed but if anything leaks or manages to get into the action then your fucked


aks are made to be easy to fix if they do fail, ar's are deigned to have a whole armorers spare parts chest supporting them if they fail

Who is that?

T.slavboo

Don't feed the pedophiles crumbs. Let them starve.

>buffer issues
>Bolt swap every 5000
>Mags cause malfunctions
>Sand
>Sealed system causes malfunctions
2/10

Really it depends. Like other have said, slav weapons are usually very simple compared to the west's arms of choice. They're much less modular as a trade-off for the simplicity. Common issues with slavshit are usually easy to clear or nig rig a solution for. The downside for that is that for a catastrophic issue, the whole weapon is usually trash afterward. An AK with a blown receiver is often more expensive to repair then it is just outright replace. On a modular weapon like an AR, it's easy and cost effective to replace more critical components in the event of a serious failure.

But it's near impossible to run any well designed gun made competently from sufficient materials from the East or West into the ground just from normal use. You need to purposely abuse and/or neglect it. Both good and poor examples exist on both sides

>pedophiles

Attached: 1539193857411.png (718x576, 385K)

>thats not a argument

T.fatnikboo

aks are way more reliable than ar15s but more inaccurate as well. just don't get a scar because they are an unreliable heavy POS and navy seals hate them

thats not even a real makarov its one of those .177 ones

Listen you dumb idiot why fucking make blueprints and test for tolerances and make complicated systems for performance and accuracy when you can just start drinking vodka, hammer shit together and it works and goes boom every time?

Maybe if americans spend some time in money and research instead of marketing

If you associate with thots never give them a gun with a magazine

hot

>says aks can cannibalize others
>designs through manufacturers not the same and built differently

>ars cant do the same
>all built to same base specs, bolts and parts interchangeable

Vatnik what??

>with polymers, bells, whistles, and lots of 'enhancements',

oh please, tell me what the fuck these are. ak 74 uses polymers. the fuck are you even talking about you retard.

you try machining the reciever of an ak with western non-slave wage labor, see how cheap that end up .