TICK TOCK AMERICOCK

>The F-22 lacks the capability to strike ground targets as opposed to the Su-57. Strelets explained that the F-22 was initially designed as an air superiority jet, while the Su-57 was created as a more versatile aircraft from the beginning. As a result, internal compartments of the F-22 were unable to hold munitions with significant payloads.

>When comparing the F-35 and Su-57 aircraft, Sukhoi's chief developer stressed the increased manoeuvrability and acceleration of the latter. He also noted that both the F-22 and F-35 are less versatile in terms of fulfilling various combat tasks than the Russian plane.

Attached: SmartSelectImage_2018-11-12-13-26-41.png (1439x1483, 641K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=DN2zCJ5WBn4&t=916
c7f.navy.mil/Media/News/Display/Article/1688397/us-navy-aircraft-crashes-in-philippine-sea/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

imagine being so poor you can't make designated air superiority and strike airframes

>Your air superiority aircraft isn't as good at being a multirole aircraft as my multirole aircraft
We have 1000 F-16s to do multirole shit. Not everyone is a poorfag slav.

So good that it got cancelled and even the Indians wont touch it?

The West is finished.

So good program was canceled when no one bought it

F-22 secures air-superiority.
F-15X blasts every ground target with, what? 22 full size hard-points?

Chang and the Vatniks hard at work the last couple of days.

Indians are trying to buy f35s now

Imagine being so ineducable you cancel one lockmart aircraft and buy another one because lockmart told you so.

Attached: lockmart exposed.jpg (970x545, 96K)

>Sputnik
/thread

Concurrency know what it is before exposing you're retardation

LOOK AT HIS INLETS

Attached: OH NO NO NO NO.jpg (2990x1994, 852K)

IMPRESIVINSKI

>F-22 has no ground strike ability
>Has already dropped more bombs in anger than the Pak-Fa ever will

"stealth"

Why is anybody still talking about this? it's done it's gone.

ITS NOT STEALTH IF IT HAS NO SDUCTS
>*starts falling apart mid air*

Yes that's true.
And
(citation needed) for the other shit you said

Funny cause it's true

Attached: tyrone laughing.jpg (620x670, 52K)

>it's done it's gone.
Nice fake news.

I bet you wish it was vatnik. Strident junction made you piss your pants didn't it?

well, 1 is greater than 0.

Attached: zumwalt merchant.jpg (322x471, 57K)

great retort.

imagine making a plane so bad that not even india doesnt want it

POO IN THE SU

at least chang has a leg to stand on.

>tfw the US has built 5 different stealth aircraft and already retired one before the slavs ever managed to put their first into service

Attached: republikek.jpg (750x501, 66K)

>bombs
Lol.

Attached: t-50 launching kh-59mk2.jpg (1440x810, 49K)

Attached: lockheeb martin.png (300x100, 8K)

That's all you've got and that's sad

>t.

Attached: vatnik.png (205x246, 20K)

Attached: f-35 payload.jpg (935x718, 64K)

Attached: memeball_4-38-129525[1].jpg (640x494, 39K)

>F-35 hovers over the entire Russian GDP.jpg

They can't even afford to build a new dock for a carrier. Let alone a new carrier itself.

Attached: hqdefaultCA5KBS9P.jpg (480x360, 7K)

Attached: ForrestalFire.gif (442x303, 62K)

Imagine buying a new product from the same merchant after he tells you the one you bought from him before is not good anymore.

Attached: Vladimir_Putin.png (340x311, 174K)

>be USA
>carrier catches fire
>still have orders of magnitude more carriers than the slavs

Attached: 1539876515409.png (632x688, 224K)

Didn't the F-22 drop bombs on Russian mercenaries earlier this year though?

>russian doesnt know how technology works
well that explains why they dont do any maintenance on their one carrier.

Attached: admiral kuznetsov boiler.jpg (720x960, 121K)

that was the AC-130, IIRC

>Americans still gon't realise how lockmart works

Reminder that board quality would improve if the slav(e)nigger menace was rangebanned

Attached: 1528039220665.jpg (1280x1080, 403K)

this board would be perfect if they just banned all countries that operate less than two aircraft carriers simultaneously

Attached: 1390805725799.jpg (1280x1080, 336K)

>Be American
>Burn a carrier
>Bomb civilians
>Get shot down
>Get captured
>Get treated well
>Tell them everything you know
>Get exchanged
>Talk shit about your captors
>Remain butthurt for several decades
>Fart into the senator chair for longer than even fucking Brezhnev remained the General Secretary
>Take some pictures with ISIS
>Talk shit about Russia
>Die of brain cancer
Life of the average all-american russophobe.

>be Russian
>don't have toilets
>literally say "sortir" (go outside in French) to say "go to the toilet"
>don't have a functional carrier
>don't have 5th generation aircraft
>die of AIDS

The funniest thing is that they claim the Su-57 has better ability to strike ground targets than the F-22, but it still needs a fucking external targeting pod for it.

imagine being this rich that you cant fight off a company to upgrade your own air superiority aircraft and instead they flip you off and send you to the court

b-but isnt the f35 the best at multirole?

oh wait..

>when russkieniggers are trying to act tough and claim they have an effective airforce

Attached: chrome_2018-11-12_12-25-35.png (307x251, 9K)

Whatever the case you gotta admit that's a sexy T H I C C looking plane

Attached: now you have it.png (489x348, 282K)

>Sputnik

Attached: 1536124701126.jpg (1024x1017, 115K)

>arguing with Muscovites at the first place

Attached: 1541463959215437619820.png (740x1024, 911K)

Attached: 1534395418827.jpg (239x211, 10K)

youtube.com/watch?v=DN2zCJ5WBn4&t=916

Imagine countering someone calling you out for using state propaganda by posting more propaganda.

PS I don't speak subhuman

You want that americock up your ass, don't ya Vatnik?

Attached: 1537490839166.png (225x225, 7K)

uhhhhh, Jow Forumstards?

c7f.navy.mil/Media/News/Display/Article/1688397/us-navy-aircraft-crashes-in-philippine-sea/

>Pak Fail vs F-22
> full whataboutism at first possible opportunity

Amd this is why nobody takes You serious, Ivan.

Attached: dancenik.gif (200x300, 824K)

The funniest thing in the comments was a guy asking when they'll increase the pensions, only to be met with the "do you think Americans increase their pensions instead of spending on their military" reply. It was one of the most Russian exchanges I've read all month.

But they increased retirement age recently, isn't it the same thing?

That's an F-18, not an F-35.

Nah, got to fund that Su-57 somehow. Besides, the USA have higher retirement age so it's perfectly fine.

What's Amd?
Why did you capitalise "You"? Did you mean (You)?

Attached: 501.png (735x541, 27K)

>Sputnik headline
>No link
>Usual Vatnik ramblings about cancelled not-stealth fighter destroying USA

Attached: gopniks01.jpg (733x465, 54K)

>Lockmart fairly wins two competitions in a row with a superior design they can actually build almost as-is
>HURR DEY CHETED BRIBED DURR!

I think he's referring to the time a fuel port panel fell off an F-35...because it wasn't properly reinstalled.

That's not how it works, you fucking retarded vatnik. (Yes, I'm aware that's redundant)

>implying stealth tech has mattered since the 90's
If the serbs can shoot down stealth jets, anyone can

>Vatnik trying desperately to attack Lockmart, who produces exactly what the US military asks them to and competed to win the contract
I don't think you understand it. But then again, Russian MIC is all state-run welfare systems.

Then why are the Russian braindead morons building stealth aircraft? Are they literally that retarded?

CANCELLED

>why is everyone in the world building stealth aircraft
Because it's still better than not stealth, even if it is effectively obsolete against a modern army
Also how retarded are you
>hurr russia can't into stealth
>hurr russia building stealth

>Old as fuck plane got fucked, crew ejected and are fine
Not seeing a point?

imagine not being able to afford anything

>Incident that simply proved how hard it is to kill stealth aircraft
>Russia and China scrambling to get sort-of stealth fighters into service
>Hurr stealth dun metter durr

>The F-22 lacks the capability to strike ground targets
wrong
>As a result, internal compartments of the F-22 were unable to hold munitions with significant payloads.
If an F-22 is carrying around air to ground munitions it would imply air superiority has been established
>Sukhoi's chief developer stressed the increased manoeuvrability and acceleration of the latter
Yeah, because increased maneuverability and acceleration is important in BVR employment

Russians are trash

>effectively obsolete
Stop repeating this retarded crap because you're not going to convince anyone. Stealth works and is effective. The laws of physics, even today, are still in effect.

>hurr russia can't into stealth
>hurr russia building stealth
Here you have the difference between intention and result.

>I-it's o-obsol-l-lete b-but e-everyo-o-one has t-to h-have i-it
Man, the doublethink here is hilarious.

Also, Su-57 is only F-16 grade LO.

>Also, Su-57 is only F-16 grade LO.
hello where is proofs

>effectively obsolete against a modern army
So Russia is fucked then

>rooster.jpg
Your own defense ministry admitted it like 5 years ago.

link pls I wanna read it

F-22 is air supiriority. F-35 is multi role designed to take out ground targets at an extreme distance. Do research before posting slav garbage with no source Ivan.

Ticktock, the russians made an equivalent jet to the F22 nearly two decades after the F22 was designed.

i like it.

Attached: Su-57 armament.jpg (1920x1080, 574K)