ukdefencejournal.org.uk
>the Autonomous Warrior experiment will last four weeks and test a range of prototype unmanned aerial and autonomous ground vehicles which aim to reduce the danger to troops during combat. The exercise will finish with a battlegroup experiment, where the best ideas and products will be tested in the toughest of simulated operational environments.
Good idea or impractical gimmick?
>the key area it is set to test, according to a news release, is the autonomous ‘last mile’ resupply.
cancelled due to racism
What an amazing board, the quality of discourse here is unmatched.
>triggered
You saying the bongs wouldn't be dumb enough to hand this shit over to Mohamed?
luv watchin telly
Well let's just hope they can't be hacked or stolen and used against us.
Should just buy Chinese.
They really don't think this shit through do they. That thing would get rekt in no time at all.
All they're designed to do is resupply the front line. It's not a weapons platform.
>for_queen_and_country.exe
Chad Chinese 30mm cannon vs Virgin British 7.62 chaingun.
Oh wait, that british robot is unarmed.
KEK.
>britain nogunz even for military robots
Another one with two ATGMs
It's a good idea for hunting insurgents and area denial, Hauling shit is a maybe since they could probably do the same fucking thing, cheaper with an hacked up atv. However without even a simple remote gun it's moved from asset to a liability.
>That thing would get rekt in no time at all.
That's kind of the point, have the robot take the hits and do all the dangerous work so troops don't have to. That Chinese thing probably costs a half a million a well trained US infantryman probably costs 5 to 7 million. Why not train the to run cheap ass robots then have them do all the dirty work and lower the risk. And who the fuck cares if robots get shot up and left on the battlefield, things probably cost more to ship back to the US and refurbish than just building another one.
It's designed to provide weapons, not to fight. Which makes more sense than the world's shittiest tank.
>impractical gimmick?
They said same about planes
hahaha chinks the think their shit is so hot, all the while the US military had already came up with 20 years earlier and at a higher level of quality.
>case and point the US made Ripsaw MS1
But does it have a BV?
>a weapon to surpass Metal Gear
It's intended to resupply troops, so it'd fucking well better have one or they'll just gut it and turn it into a stove.