What do think of this girl? is she too old?

Because there are incentives for politicians who push for expensive new military technology, especially for those who have major companies, like Boeing or a shipyard in their district. It provides a lot of jobs around the country, and benefits from lobbyists/campaign donations

>The 4400th recommended the aircraft not be used in combat without a major upgrade program. Specific problems identified included a slow combat speed (135 knots), a low working altitude, no capability for "zoom" escapes after delivering ordnance and a complete lack of armor protection for the crew and vital aircraft systems. On June 30, 1972, the 4400th SOS ferried the AU-23As to Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, for storage.

stolen from wikipedia

defensenews.com/air/2019/01/18/the-air-forces-plans-to-begin-a-light-attack-aircraft-competition-are-now-deferred-indefinitely/

The Light attack competition for the USAF has been postponed for the foreseeable future

I miss the old plane.
especially biplane

Attached: 114_image1.jpg (350x233, 32K)

GILF

That is infuriating.

I was shocked the first time I saw a Dragonfly in person. It's tiny and low to the ground. I was driving an NA Miata back then and I think my car was bigger.

Attached: still-buzzing-a-37-dragonfly-in-high-res-67-1[1].png (920x631, 741K)

Same here!

Attached: porter_RRD1.jpg (3000x2019, 1.46M)

I loved it when you bungee jumped to bottom of the dam and blew up the weapons factory.

Why would the PC-6 be obsolete?
it's a light STOL transport it doens't need to be hyper advanced, like the C-130