Competition Beretta Released

>"match" takedown lever
what?
is that the new thing in 3 gun where you have to field strip the gun?

I, too, own a mauser hi power
I wish it had magazines that fit flush though

Attached: yKQAAWu.jpg (1932x2576, 247K)

To be a “wonder 9” it needs to:
>Have a ~15+ mag capacity
>Be DA/SA
Nice gun but it’s no wonder nine

Mine does, mecgar and the Canadian mags work gread

I'll take that in mind
it's such a shame about the trigger though, I always wanted an HP and when I got ahold of one the trigger was so gritty that I died a little
at least the beretta 92 series have buttery smooth triggers

Attached: ber0.jpg (2576x1932, 876K)

So Glocks are not “Wonder 9’s”?

No

Neat. I always thought they were what coined that term

wonder 9s are a thing from the 70s and 60s

looks like rancid shit

there are > 9000 springs and detents hidden in this picture
can you find them all?

I want Beretta to make a fuckhuge 92 series pistol akin to the MK23 or Deagle.

>DA/SA for comp
>absolutelydisgusting.png

Come over here and give this sexy blue trigger a squeeze

Attached: Walther-Arms-Q5-Match-SF-2-photo-by-Bill-Blowers.jpg (696x450, 82K)

>92 but in .45
>even thicker, longer, and taller brigadier II slide
>6" barrel
>frame is ~1.7x bigger
>doublestack .45 magazine
fund it

Too much metal way too heavy
Nah

Heavy you say?

Attached: index.jpg (198x255, 5K)

FIRES WITHOUT MAGAZINE
READ MANUAL BEFORE USE

>safety warnings on gun itsefl
Utter garbage, anyone who buys it should be flogged.

I like it and I would buy it.
But I dont like the skeletonized hammer, it just seems like its tempting a light primer strike if the hammer spring is replaced.
And Short Reach Triggers should come standard these days, I dont like the idea of thinking every time I might want to buy a Beretta in the future im going to have to get an SRT kit and gunsmith the pistol to put it in.
yeah, well, check your gun before you do stupid stuff with it.
Ill bet you dont put your seat belt on automatically when you get in the car either.

FIRES WITHOUT MAGAZINE
READ MANUAL BEFORE USE
based. spread the gospel kid

Unlike a taurus, it fires

I’ve never had an issue with mine, however the reset, or lack thereof is my issue. I’m thibking about getting a trigger job for my FÉG

Attached: 819B3FEC-13F3-4CCC-9B5C-B4FB27F0E59F.jpg (4032x3024, 3.05M)

Wtf is wrong with your steering wheel

well they fixed the safety so thats a start

this

I like it.

Attached: file.png (754x770, 573K)

When I quit smoking I would get angry in traffic while going through withdrawal so I would clench it and rub shit off. It’s a work truck so it’s not important

bhp does hold 15 flush fit

10mm version when?

*mogs u*

Attached: 8C094C50-0546-4DB8-8B6A-96D295C04FBF.gif (576x387, 47K)

Plastic bricks BTFO

>SLANTED DUST COVER

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

You would love a car that has a sign that reminds you to wear the seatbelt on the door.

> Still can't put an optic on it without dropping the rear sights.
The fuck, Walther? L&M Precision can mill it for sights, why can't you?

It's lighter than a 1911, eat your spinach.

It's a race gun. Fixed sights sights would only get in the way.

So what was the Q4 tac's excuse then? Walther doesn't offer a single optics ready model that the rear sight isn't attached to optics plate.

I'm just bitter because I really like my PPQ, but my eyes get tired trying to do target focus with that shitty white dot only.

It's the ultimate 9mm pistol.
>all steel
>18+1rd capacity
>DA/SA hammer

I love Beretta. But this isn't necessarily a good looking gun. Very busy. The 92a1 is objectively the best looking Beretta.

Attached: OTdCNzI4ODhBRDUxNjE3Nzc3RjM6Y2YwY2VmYjFlZjIwZTFlZWI3MDViODI3ZjY4OGFmNGY6Ojo6OjA=.jpg (600x427, 41K)

I’ve always heard people shit on the 92 for the slide mounted safety, this is definitely an improvement in that regard

I like it, I’d carry it

Nah, I'll stick with my 92FS.

Attached: 20190511_195500.jpg (3165x1780, 3.31M)

Does Sig have a metal frame P320 yet? Aside from the custom run they did for the cemetary guards.

>DA/SA pistol with a thumb safety
I don't care if it's mounted on the frame. if you can't carry it cocked-and-locked (you can't), then what's the point of it being there at all? It needs to be decock-only.

>army green

XD

Can just as well ignore it and just use the DA trigger as your safety.

Why in the fuck would I buy a heavy as fuck "match" handgun that has a double action first pull?

For the OP pic gun? Hell if I know, I'd assume you would cock the hammer in advance or something, like any other hammer fired gun.
I don't do competitions, obviously.

Because SAO hammer guns aren't legal for production, which is the target audience for this pistol.

>Beretta 95

>SAO hammer guns aren't legal for production
What the fuck are you smoking? What do you think a 1911 pistol is?

Attached: candyman.gif (500x276, 985K)

Production division. Should have capitalized it.

Well fuck, then.

The fact that warnings trigger people are just proof that they are necessary

Why do stupid people reply as if they know anything?

>I'd assume you would cock the hammer in advance or something, like any other hammer fired gun.
>Because SAO hammer guns aren't legal for production

WRONG
the rail detracts from the look
A safety doesn’t belong on it in the first place. Also you’d carry a big ass steel frame 92? I doubt it
>it’s green
OH NO NO NO
You can carry it cocked and locked you twit
Brainlet
>don’t know
Why respond then?
Brainlet squared

>fires without magazine
Dropped.

FIRES WITHOUT MAGAZINE
READ MANUAL BEFORE USE

>Because SAO hammer guns aren't legal for production
Why do stupid people respond as if they know anything?

Attached: 0B52549E-B0C2-483D-AF6D-4A541E8D7331.jpg (1125x292, 118K)

It's always funny to see stupid people who are wrong who can't stop projecting.
>You can carry it cocked and locked you twit
No, you cannot. Beretta lists this as DA/SA on their website. If you knew jack shit about Beretta pistols (you don't), you'd know that their handguns with frame-mounted safeties are not just safeties. They are safety/decockers. In the up/safe position, it decocks the weapon. It's like the model 84. Beretta has done special edition 92's that were single action only, and those could be carried cocked-and-locked, but this isn't like those.

See where it says "a DA/SA pistol"? You don't even know what you don't know. Whata pathetic mess of ignorance you are. Beretta has done special edition 92 variants that were SAO. If this were one of those guns, then the rule you quoted wouldn't apply.

I meant in general use, you fucking spergs, people use pistols for things besides competitions.

>I meant in general use, you fucking spergs, people use pistols for things besides competitions.
This doesn't change how stupid you are. Nobody who knows how to shoot their gun would cock the hammer of a DA/SA pistol back. That's just something they do in movies.

>use DA as safety
>cock hammer for SA if there's any time to do so
Works for me.

>thumb safety is a decocker on the 92x
WRONG
R
O
N
G

>Whata pathetic mess of ignorance you are
Watch as the brainlet doesn’t respond once he realizes his mistake

Attached: 45464DB2-37EC-4C9E-B25C-6719968BECFE.jpg (1125x308, 122K)

>Angrily calls people stupid and wrong
>posts two obviously wrong things in only one (1) post
OH NO NO NO

m.youtube.com/watch?v=H3ZDnk3czIo
Go to 1:50 you twit

Lmao all the butthurt glocktards and HK sharts

I stand corrected. Not sure why you thought I was angry.

Steel frame and Brigadier slide is shit brick house of durability.

I’m a rather big fellow and I like my metal frame handguns

Heh original wonder 9 coming through

Attached: 20181009_184913.jpg (4032x3024, 3.77M)