Post a more aesthetic poly - striker

I’ll wait

Attached: D88D81C7-3238-4EA0-B4CC-D884542A3FAA.jpg (1350x900, 288K)

Attached: p320.jpg (2016x1512, 1.12M)

The Gen 1

literally any other poly striker gun. even taurus.

The USP if it was striker

literally anything but a glock

Yuck
Wrong
Sorry, doesn’t count
>41463331
Glock is more attractive than
>PPQ
>p320
>p10c (by a mile)
>M&P (2.0 has a chance but they screwed the pooch with the fcs and frame portholes

Khar P9

Fair enough

>featureless stick gun
>attractive

wather q5 and canik tp9sfx.

Streamlined and clean looking. No unnecessary flourishes or add ons. It’s incredibly Germanic in that sense.

Both hideous :DD
The correct answer here is p99 with ski ramp

buts its just so boring... its like a prius or a camry they are okay and get the job done which is good but so can others that are more interesting.

everyone and their moms have a glock just like a gt mustang or challenger what else is new

Equating fins to cars is retarded, retard. Also just because it is ubiquitous does not make it unattractive

maybe for you. Ive had both q5 and tp9sfx and gen 1 nd gen 2 p99s
most people that see the p99s just kind of glance it and be like oh another poly gun
but when they see the tp9sfx or q5 it gets quite a lot of attention.

*guns

Attached: 63B0EE49-F298-4189-AD25-3F8740000C08.png (265x238, 56K)

>judging attractiveness based on the amount of looks it gets
That’s a terrible gauge. I’m sure this would get a lot more attention from people than a classic painting of a beautiful woman. Does that make it more aesthetic?

Attached: 111910E3-47E1-43B8-84CB-F1426E8A6C99.jpg (300x394, 35K)

I just said its boring not unattractive. Also worrying about attractiveness seems more retarded. I can smell your insecurities through the fiber optics.

I don’t worry about it, don’t project.
I take pleasure in owning things that look good to my eye. This thread is for discourse not validation

as op said equating paintings to guns would be retarded I guess.
however I don't really care to be honest I am just sharing my experience so other people can get an insight. Other people have their preferences and it's really none of my business or concern of what they like or prefer. Im just on here making suggestions and sharing opinions.

But it is true though, is it not? Ugly things often get more attention than attractive things.

so your on a weapons forum for discourse and not weapons? what kind of boring shit is that.

I think in circumstances ugly things can get more attention and attractive things can get more attention. it can go both ways however i am here for weapons my friend. If you know of any interesting ones please post!!!!

Look up discourse in the dictionary, I have a feeling you don’t fully grasp it’s meaning

>Germanic
right into the trash

Attached: 1555013398809.png (452x391, 122K)

Here’s one!
Remember to post aesthetic poly strikers, as stated in the OP :DDD

Attached: A7842ECE-8A06-48D9-A3F9-6CB7C03A2858.jpg (1023x747, 90K)

It appears my superiority has led to some consternation :^)

Attached: 7E74B762-501D-4D5D-A54D-E0A86DF831B6.jpg (1106x1500, 607K)

Yet here you are still talking about this and that instead of talking about weapons... I fully grasp the meaning. I just used it in context to prove a point and you walked right into it. Classic. Anyway who cares post guns my friend.

I will admit the P99 is attractive. Still not sure which I prefer

Attached: 0CCDB300-3035-4386-A143-E99B59C7C2FB.jpg (4176x2784, 945K)

>discourse about weapons
That’s what Jow Forums is meant to be
>you fell right into my trap! I was merely pretending to be retarded
Classic

Some guns just look better with lights on them
>FLUSH FIT BBY

Attached: 87525F6D-8383-43AF-A01D-AE307CDCEC67.jpg (720x1280, 72K)

Springfield XD, glock is blocky you prolly play with legos. Hammer fire is better anyway

>Springfield XD
OH NO NO NO
Now here’s a possible contender

Attached: 8598151D-671A-4FB8-89F4-C824E1A92D74.jpg (2048x1536, 1.41M)

*ahem*

Attached: Walther PPX Threaded Barrel 4-2016 (1).jpg (1920x1080, 290K)

Still better looking than the Creed

No arguments here

Attached: 1552532025797.jpg (3120x4160, 2.01M)

consider an upgrade

Attached: engraving-stage3-1a.jpg (1440x960, 617K)

>no skid marks
For shame user

Oh no, I’m a zoomer with no testerone, that’s not for me.

Glock Gen 2s got that 90s aesthetic goin. I want one

Fuck that unattractive blocky piece of shit with no rememberable color codes. H&K's got C U R V E S and their black-white-red™ color code.

Attached: tumblr_ouhfffBgMc1s57vgxo4_1280-660x435.jpg (660x435, 32K)

Fucking zoomers and their semi automatic whizbangs. THIS is a man’s gun

Attached: 65F7A268-7F15-4D25-B906-5CE9502C0630.jpg (1000x541, 17K)

Color code? You mean the safety markings? Yeah I’ll take my striker fired pistol sans thumb safety, because I’m not an idiot

Indeed

Attached: 6C61BC8F-CBF6-4615-943B-E96A321BD8D0.jpg (450x300, 23K)

Depends if you feel like you need or not. A striker handgun with a thumb safety is basically the same thing as a USP with an LEO trigger.

Attached: 1453-FacebookThumbnail-2.jpg (800x408, 31K)

Attached: CZ100~03.png (1920x1080, 1.57M)

Attached: nAInTSX.jpg (1080x810, 150K)

just the gen 1 though, the gen 2 looks like a glock

Attached: smith and wesson mp 9mm.jpg (760x550, 41K)

Attached: 0f3eb0af5abeec8019c8bfc7067a8ee1.jpg (546x640, 74K)

CAUTION: CAPABLE OF FIRING WITH MAGAZINE REMOVED

God fucking damn it now i need a 34 again.

Baby hands.

Big polymer

that's the one

For me it’s the Glock 19

Attached: 6A40D837-E1A1-4ECB-8E93-B449924F01E0.jpg (1024x576, 106K)

Finally, /thread.
You faggots can all go home and hot glue your GI Joe's.

This is what I was going to post. I have a 10mm KRISS, but when I finally get a Glock 40 - I'm conceal carrying it. Fuck caring about printing, I live in Kentucky anyways.

What the fug

>Post a more aesthetic poly - striker

Attached: stupid_walkingdead_nerfbat.jpg (1500x801, 81K)

CURSED IMAGE