Does anyone legitimately believe there will be some kind of conservative gun owner revolt if the 2A gets attacked...

Does anyone legitimately believe there will be some kind of conservative gun owner revolt if the 2A gets attacked? Because I don't see how one will happen.
-They won't explicitly come after your guns, confiscation is already underway with things like red flag laws.
-Most gun owners are old boomers who won't fight
-Adding onto that, the threat of the US government is seriously underestimated, we would literally be living underground for years
-You would be fighting alongside anti-American revolutionary groups, including storm fags, tankies, Islamist theocraticians, and others, putting off many people from joining a revolt
-the CIA and FBI have perfected group infiltration making organizing exceptionally difficult
- there is no recent example of people revolting during a gun grab
-Even though the 2nd Amendment is there to protect the other 9, no other attack on the Constitution is considered bad enough to revolt for, only if they explicitly announce gun grabs on TV.

I just don't see it happening, and it being useful in any way other than as a threat to leftists (who won't be in the line of fire, so just don't care).

Attached: 1513385608448.jpg (1152x1600, 317K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/c7YzrbeLbJE
youtube.com/watch?v=Sc8GF8YLsHc
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Yeah

Just let a Jow Forumsmmando dream

Don't get me wrong, I could see lots of people finally making use of their bug-out bags and going innawoods, but I don't see the kind of meaningful resistance against the government many claim will happen.

Go away, CIA.

Also,
>no other attack on the Constitution is considered bad enough to revolt for
That's some fresh horseshit you got there. Attack the 1st, 4th, or 5th and you'll see violence in the streets pretty fucking quick, and that's just the first 5. Fuck up the 10th and the states break out their state guards and militias. 13th? Hello The South, I see you've risen again.

Honestly, it'd be faster to list amendments that wouldn't spark violent revolt and general unrest.

think I'll start this list with the amendment that made alcohol legal again.

The 1st Amendment gets trampled on all the time by corporations but no one does shit because I guess corporations don't count huh?

corporations are a private entity and dont have to host your thoughts.
boycotting in large numbers is the best you can do.

Wait, are you saying fucking that up wouldn't lead to violence in the streets? Because I'm damn sure if we cut off the booze, it'll get bad in cities quickly. Just another win for small towns and private brewers.

True, I think that's more because people have lost sight of what Free Speech actually is about, and idiots and evil folks have meme'd the idea that Free Speech only means the 1st, and that's only for the gov't., so the corps get a pass. See this post: I'm still waiting for the day enough other people get angry, grab their rifles and go outside. It's been a long time coming, and when it does come it'll make the 80s unrest look tame.

>Most gun owners are old boomers
You got a source and some statistics to back that up? It looks to me like you’re talking out your ass.

>it'll make the 80s unrest look tame.
What 80s unrest? Do you mean the 60s/early 70s? Were you homeschooled?

You don’t know boomers as well as you think.
>be boomer
>mad that young punks are illegally dirt biking on land where they aren’t supposed to near residential
>they might’ve been running a business but I may be misremembering
>too loud for old boomer ears
>call the cops but they don’t even bother coming out
>shit goes on for weeks
>finally get fed up
>threaten to shoot the dirt bikers if they don’t fuck off
>dirt bikers call the police
>police show up at boomers house
>fattest cops you’ve ever seen
>refuse to arrest bikers tell boomer he’s gonna get arrested instead
>boomer pulls out a handgun and kills both cops
>goes back inside to prepare to fight because oh shit he’s feeling it
>cops send a kill team
>boomer meets them in the street in plate carrier with 2 ar15s
>both guns jam within 5 rounds
>he gets shot in the plate a couple times and surrenders
I mean they’ll fight but it probably won’t be very effective.

>both guns jam within 5 rounds
Remember to clean your guns kids and not use shitty RELOADS or ammo

The revolution with be racial.

youtu.be/c7YzrbeLbJE

Attached: 1557690074903.jpg (418x612, 60K)

>stormfags
>friends
They're authoritarians. They want to take away your freedom.

>They won't explicitly come after your guns, confiscation is already underway with things like red flag laws.
Yes, this is their way of boiling the frog slowly. the more people don't let them do this and the more they have to use force to take guns the better.
>Most gun owners are old boomers who won't fight
Not sure it's most, but a lot are.
>Adding onto that, the threat of the US government is seriously underestimated, we would literally be living underground for years
Cool, we can build some nice vietnam tunnels.
>You would be fighting alongside anti-American revolutionary groups, including storm fags, tankies, Islamist theocraticians, and others, putting off many people from joining a revolt
Stormfags and conservative libertarians are friends, tankies and islamists get gassed.
>the CIA and FBI have perfected group infiltration making organizing exceptionally difficult
Which is why militias shouldn't be formed until needed, just anonymously give information to likeminded individuals on how to prepare and what to do if the day comes.
>there is no recent example of people revolting during a gun grab
They're usually in places filled with cuck faggots, or don't ban enough to justify retaliation in the minds of normalfag fencesitters.
>Even though the 2nd Amendment is there to protect the other 9, no other attack on the Constitution is considered bad enough to revolt for, only if they explicitly announce gun grabs on TV.
The 2nd is the most important, if people willingly give it up everything else is fucked and they can't do anything about it.

>repost because forgot to greentext OP

Attached: IMG_7573.jpg (1280x991, 188K)

I just really see the lack of people involved and the lack of a coherent idea of what a revolution would entail being a problem. I mean what would our goal be? Tunneling directly into the White House and executing everyone inside? Would that even change anything?

No, we want to take away leftist's freedom.

Wanting an fascist state for themselves doesn't mean they're opposed to ancapistan also existing, just look at Jow Forums, pretty much the whole board is either ancap or natsoc, and they get along great for the most part, they both hate leftists, and white nationalists like guns, as long as you're not a leftist it shouldn't be a problem.

Inside of every National Socialist is an anarchist that's been pushed too far.

You're thinking too much of army vs army and both sides having coherent goals. A pure attack on the 2A, or any of them wouldn't result in honest to God militia forming. Not at first. It would just be a bunch of very pissed off, heavily armed people taking to the streets. People would stop reporting to work out of fear of their life during their commute, or because they want to participate in the rioting. Work being slowed to a crawl means shortages Nationwide. Cops and others would barely be willing to respond to local calls let alone ones where the government is demanding they go door to door to take your guns. Then if the US decides to go full fuck it and try to use our own military against us, there would be attempted UN intervention. This doesn't even begin to account for the desertion rate of the military.

The US government trying to take guns by sheer force, pure authoritarian style would be anarchy. They'd be running all over the place trying to stamp out rebellions, except the rebellions are nation wide AND unpredictable AND their military/national guard/police aren't able to be 100% relied on.

Ever consider housing and money may be a way to start off? How the fuck do you think the See Eye jew do their operations? They have a fucking base. Now imagine if 16+ year old Whites shared housing and kept their jobs instead of losing them to spergy political preferences and then built up money and numbers before spreading and using the money towards weapons and corporate levying or political lobbying on a local level.

You now have 20 lads in one State all with legal guns and no previous convictions acting as good boy muricans going to church when all the while you can plan your shit at home while shit posting and playing vidya with other White men 16 and above.

Attached: 1557597479091.gif (487x344, 3.27M)

>-the CIA and FBI have perfected group infiltration making organizing exceptionally difficult
Haha yea, they're so good they infiltrate their own honeypots.

>I guess corporations don't count huh?
They literally don't count.

not today cia

Attached: 1555293919351.png (610x613, 107K)

the problem arises in anti-discrimination laws. most of them involve political viewpoints as well. if twitter allows mr communist to espouse xirs viewpoints, then by law, they must also allow all the other groups to espouse theirs. The great conundrum, which has yet to be concluded, is that the Supreme court has ruled there is no such thing as hate speech, which brings in to question the legality of twitter/facebook etc. censoring the supposed racist bigots(read, anyone right of center) for their views.

>corporations are a private entity
built on public infrastructure.

Fuck around and find out glownigger.

Attached: 1557614116960.png (1465x1200, 240K)

If you're discussing big tech the problem is that cutouts in the law mean that they enjoy the benefits of being a platform and a publisher with the liabilities of neither.

Read a book son.

where?

Fat faggot

Cringe

Fuck off antifa.

The internet.

Fuck off commie. Nobody wants to join your gay kerchief club.

all of the phone lines and cables. you cant deny someone a telephone line over their beliefs, its a law.

>The internet.
What parts of the internet are publicly owned infrastructure?

The common denominator for Jow Forums is race and gun rights, and most libertarians are white.
If you watch Adolf Hitler's speeches regarding America, you will see he put a massive emphasis on not restricting personal freedom for Americans, though it may be just be him trying to be persuasive.

Are you serious?

Dead serious. The only possibly legitimate argument you could have is POTS supported internet service which very few people have anymore. Rural is all about satellite and microwave links these days, city infrastructure is coax and fiber. It's all privately owned.

How's that an antifa post? it's about the phenomenon of lots of ancaps becoming natsocs.

Yes

The government would never grab guns since gun owners are 1) a large source of tax money 2) make up a large number of the military

Yes there will be a rebellion if thec2nd Amendment is not respected.
No most gun owners detest nazis, islamists, and the military and police will side with us.
No I am not a "boomer".

I hear a voice coming from your anus...

Might want to check your own first.

No. Jow Forums is literally every ideology possible. Common misconception.
It has commies, occasional antifa, trump neocons, accelerationists, islamists, anarchists, libertarians, and even lgbt neoliberal leftists.

Just because peopke spam hitler and islam shill threads 24/7 does not mean the majority are that. Only the obsessed and the shareblue bots post that shit for pay.
The majority of people who seriously post there are from all walks.
Probably less than 5 women post there a month tho.

You spend too much time in here. The vast majority of people that actually matter in any American conflict scenario will be neither Antifa nor NatSocs.
I hate both. Most gun owners I know do as well.
Most military and gun owners I know could be considrred CivNats, Libertarians, Conservatives, or American Nationalists. Or some mix there.

Both the groups you mentioned matter only on mainstream media and pol.

why do you and the people you know hate NatSocs

cause socialists?

It's literally a far-right political position that dehumanizes communists and advocates for private enterprise and property

youtube.com/watch?v=Sc8GF8YLsHc

>Yes there will be a rebellion if thec2nd Amendment is not respected.
It's already not respected, where's your rebellion?
>the military and police will side with us.
They'll side with who they think will win and keep paying them


Every ideology gets shitposted on Jow Forums but most anons who've been there for a long time tend to fall into those two ideologies, even a lot of the commies are nazbol fags who like natsocs and hate other commies.
>every nazi post on Jow Forums is actually a paid shill
Fuck off back to Jow Forumsthe_donald you dumb boomer.

>shitty RELOADS
he doesn't roll his own match grade ammo just sad

National Socialism is not the same thing as the socialism leftists want, but neocon boomer retards keep saying it is and will never understand that two ideologically opposed groups could use the same word with their own ideas of what it means.

CivNat is the epitome of cuckdom

Natsocs are a massive conundrum to most people. it isn't the same as communist/modern socialists by a long shot, but it isn't true capitalism either. there is a reason it was stamped out. y'all should look into the post weimar period reforms the nazi's did outside the rearmament efforts. There is a reason they were enjoying a healthy economy when everyone else was still languishing in the great depression.

>The revolution with be racial.

Attached: 1437392201671.png (741x649, 23K)

Damn... should have kept fighting instead of surrendering.

>Military & police will side with us
Hoo boy, if you think WE'RE fascists...

i'm not a footfag, but those are some chubby toes

>The erasing of rights is okay so long as it’s not the government.
>It’s okay if the banks and big tech are tyrannts
Ben Shapiro/Boomer/Neocon please leave

>-Most gun owners are old boomers who won't fight
His name was Gary Willis.

A lot of these responses are so awful I have no hope for America.

If there's ever actually a civil war in America it will happen because the USG thinks they can profit off of it.

>Rebel early while we can still trust you, goyim!

Nice try, Chaim. We're letting Gen Z get a little older, a little more desperate, and waiting for a Democrat in office.

>REEEEE WHY WON'T YOU JOIN OUR CLASS WARFARE REEEEE PLEASE ENABLE OUR MARXISM REEEE

Attached: 1557442413691.jpg (347x318, 21K)

Gee I wonder why we regularly have these threads trying to demoralize us out of preparing for a civil war against a potential President Harris or Swallwell.

Attached: 1557768662379.gif (498x278, 1.31M)

Can we ban niggers from private corporations and make America as great as it was pre-1950s?