Why would anyone choose weak american guns made from recycled plastic over superior wood'n'steel guns?

Why would anyone choose weak american guns made from recycled plastic over superior wood'n'steel guns?

Attached: 3dc605a9e1f6605f0c9de7c5b59cf802.jpg (500x313, 34K)

Because aesthetics are subjective but wood swelling when it gets wet isn't.

they are heavy as fuck
You try carrying one for days not just a range trip

>what is wood oil

>commie poorfag non-free state cope

>sks is heavy
user, I...

Something you don't have to put on polymer.

8,5 pounds vs 6,5 pounds
An extra 2 pounds

You got that backwards.

I love me some wood and steel but honestly for a gun that you are going to beat the fuck out of, synthetic and modern finishes please.

no noticeable difference.

You need to lift weights, tubby

can you tell if your gun is loaded from the feel? you should

Because we're not limited to 5 rounds in a magazine

Attached: 1541119496864.jpg (350x335, 27K)

Because if I beat the shit out of a synthetic stock, I can fix it quickly or replace it equally as quickly. If I beat the shit out of a wood stock, the cost to fix it (or replace and re-bed everything) is considerably higher.

t.never operated
t.larper
t.notgonnamakeit

Polymer is:
Lighter
Stronger
Inherently more consistent
Doesn't rot
Cheaper

The only benefit to wood is aesthetics.

Get a g3 clone. Shit is easy and cheap to replace furniture on

>Starving chinks, norks and ruskies can ruck SKSes
>You cant

Hit the gym

>t. hungry skeleton

Imagine complying

Attached: C2028724-415A-4366-BDAB-9A0DB776C26F.jpg (124x122, 7K)

Well said, user.

Have this (you).

Attached: (you).png (1136x640, 510K)