Sources: Russian stealth UAV "Hunter" for the first time rose into the air

Sources: Russian stealth UAV "Hunter" for the first time rose into the air

The plane in the early spring for the first time made full boost and pulled away from the runway of the Novosibirsk aircraft plant, the exact date of the planned first flight is not yet known

MOSCOW, may 25. /TASS/. Russian heavy shock UAV "Hunter", executed with application of technology "stealth" at the beginning of spring for the first time rose into the air from the runway of the Novosibirsk aviation plant. Chkalov. This was reported by TASS two sources in the aircraft manufacturing industry, noting that trials are not flying.

The "hunter" in early spring for the first time made full boost and pulled away from the runway of the Novosibirsk aircraft plant. The machine rose into the air to a height of several meters, making the so-called jump, then immediately landed", - said one of interlocutors of the Agency.
Another industry source said to TASS, that the tests "are not full flight, but only precede it and the need for a final check of the aerodynamics of the car, its handling and the on-Board systems". He added that in a few weeks, a series of "hops" a "Hunter". "With all of the unmanned aircraft, including taxiing, takeoff, set the speed, jump into the air, landing and stopping at the end of the runway, was done "Hunter" offline", - said the source.
The sources did not name the exact dates of past tests as well as the date of planned first flight of the "Hunter".
In the United aircraft Corporation declined to comment on the TASS provided sources of information.

Attached: hunter_1.jpg (1553x1820, 266K)

Other urls found in this thread:

qr.ae/TWNu0D
youtube.com/watch?v=gQEYkVWNtXg
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Neat peice of call of duty fanfiction you got there. Could have used some laser satellites or quantum AK rifles though.

I like it how laser satellites is some kind of science fiction to you, yet Russia had built one in the 80s.

Meh its too big to be efficient. Unlike superior Chinese drones that is far smaller yet carry larger weapons.

Attached: ZkX0Ix5dfYE (1).jpg (781x581, 99K)

>still no s-ducts

Yeah and now Russian daughters sell themselves in internet porn or sell their virginity to diabetic Americans in exchange for a decent living and a house with plumbing while Russian soldiers steal their battle buddies equipment to sell to American gun enthusiasts so they can make rent and afford food. Russia is gone my dood.

Lets place bets. How many of them do you think they'll order and have delivered by 2030?

I'm sorry, did I hurt your gentle amerishit feelings? Do you need a safe space?

Attached: 888 war trophies1.jpg (1024x768, 168K)

The AIDS statistics and gay anal rape statistics in the Russian military are more real than this shit.

>the first time made full boost
oh no, not the full boost

>Sources: Russian stealth UAV "Hunter" for the first time rose into the air

Why do you need to specify "Sources:", or did you copy from an author who can't speak English for shit?

>
The plane in the early spring for the first time made full boost and pulled away from the runway of the Novosibirsk aircraft plant, the exact date of the planned first flight is not yet known

Wow, it can fly!

>Russian heavy shock UAV "Hunter

"Shock UAV"? Fancy meaningless term there. Maybe get an assault rifle.

>executed with application of technology "stealth"

Oh wow, you mean like the B-2, F-22, F-35, etc?

>rose into the air from the runway of the Novosibirsk aviation plant. Chkalov.

They seem to be placing a lot of emphasis on the idea that it's capable of taking off, stressing it as an accomplishment...until

>This was reported by TASS two sources in the aircraft manufacturing industry, noting that trials are not flying.

So maybe it can't actually fly, conflicting news here.

>The "hunter" in early spring for the first time made full boost and pulled away from the runway of the Novosibirsk aircraft plant.

Wow, the third time they mentioned it managed to take off, what an impressive accomplishment!

>The machine rose into the air to a height of several meters

#4. It took off and fell back to the ground actually*

>are not full flight, but only precede it and the need for a final check of the aerodynamics of the car

So, it can't fly, but it's definitely a SHOCK CAR.

Уcпoкoйcя yжe вaтa. Tвoя cтpaнa былo в экoнoмичecкoй дepмe бoльшe чeм 10 лeт.

Attached: 1307651951001.jpg (330x250, 17K)

>Oh wow, you mean like the B-2, F-22, F-35, etc?

This board might think I am high on some shit but it might give 5th gen aircrafts a run for their money. I am confident that if this shit is completed it can solo 4.5th gen or 4th gen ++ aircrafts. They are still lowering the RCS of the SU-57 so far its at the RCS of a bird which can range from .0005m2 to a little over .01m2. But considering the triangle design I believe from the front it will be way lower than the SU-57. And if this shit carries ROFAR(which they had plans for with UAVs) and the claims of lowering background noise by a 100 times is deemed true than this shit can solo 5th gen aircrafts along with carrying medium air to air missiles internally.

I am still pissed that we had a drone of similar weight, design and can carry weapons the X-47B is cancelled. There are other drones in development but none of the drones in development can compare to the predator or X-47B drone.

>ROFAR
Considering how badly Russia has struggled to field a simple AESA on an aircraft, don't be too optimistic.

>lowering background noise by a 100 times
That's for all of the other parameters being the same if you even believe this claim. Do you seriously think they'll be mounting a full combat aircraft AESA on there?

>Considering how badly Russia has struggled to field a simple AESA on an aircraft, don't be too optimistic.

5-10 years they admit they are behind on MMICS but FICs is a different story in which they will be the 1st to hit the market on before anyone else

>That's for all of the other parameters being the same if you even believe this claim

Chinese made that claim referencing the Russians.

>"Shock UAV"
Google translate, obviously. You just argued with a copy-pasta, congratulations.

>Russia will jump ahead anytime now
Okay, maybe I should take a screenshot to post in 10 years when Russia is still behind everyone else.

This thing literally can't even fly yet.

production of FICs will start 3-5 years and they have other ROFAR prototypes. Go ahead.

Attached: photonic radar balloon.png (1366x1320, 333K)

yeah, just like how the SU-57 was supposed to hit the market before the F-35?

I argued with an attempt to promote this piece of shit as some amazing tech.

Zero evidence of any of that. If your argument is drones > fighters, consider that the US is light years ahead on machine learning tech.

Yes, and the Su-57 will field the first ever GaN AESA. Oh wait, the Su-57 uses GaAs modules and the first GaN radar ended up being for the Patriot.

If all of the vatnik claims about GaN AESA are true, does that mean the Patriot is superior to the S-400 and S-500 systems? Funny how that works out isn't it?

qr.ae/TWNu0D

If this thing does more than starts flying will this board still rage? Is there any other drone that we have in the same 20 ton weight, no recon, uses radar with missiles? If they progress that far and we do not have anything comparable will this whole board seethe?

I am skeptical of both the Patriot's and and S-400s capability to hit "peer adversary" targets.

Same goes for Phalanx and whatever else. The simple proof of this is that Russia threatened to shoot down legacy Tomawhawks in Syria and then did nothing, nothing at all. There isn't a single excuse for this besides "they cannot." There would be zero political repercussion for shooting down missiles in defense and there would be a huge boost to military hardware sales.

Of course, we also how well the Patriot system worked out for Saudi Arabia.

>his only argument is a quora post
goddamn i love vatniks.

Attached: 1524266896403.jpg (250x241, 9K)

Want me to copy and paste for you explanation?

oh i read the post, it was just retarded.

muhhh my feels.

>If this thing does more than starts flying will this board still rage?

Why would anyone seethe? The US had drones launching missiles for decades.

> Is there any other drone that we have in the same 20 ton weight

There are 20 ton F-4 drones. There is nothing impressive about making a heavy drone. You can make a TU-95 into a drone.

>no recon

What?

>uses radar with missiles

As opposed to what? Shooting them blind or thermals? Again, this isn't a technical achievement.

>If they progress that far and we do not have anything comparable will this whole board seethe?
>we

You do realize that this thing has demonstrated zero novel technology, right? Even if it flew (which it can't), even if it shot something BVR with no human control - there is NOTHING impressive or new about this.

the article had no sources besides russian state media. that should say all you need to know about the article that was likely made by some mutt in his basement that masturbates to /sg/ pictures.

> for you explanation

>If they progress that far and we do not have anything comparable will this whole board seethe?
>we

Hi Vatnik. You really should learn English better. Love from

youtube.com/watch?v=gQEYkVWNtXg

Its like this board is filled with NPCs and there is some random Russian or clown that goes shitposts with good quality bait.

>gets reamed two threads in a row
>"i was just pretending to be retarded"
these threads are hilarious.

Attached: 5d4b8506f28c9eaa421d35a9c1de6f6b.png (420x420, 322K)

>The US had drones launching missiles for decades.

not in a 20 weight ton class

>There is nothing impressive about making a heavy drone

Super heavy drones

>>gets reamed two threads in a row

As in the US has not achieved anything significant on a 20 ton drone. I guess whatever floats your boat.

>a heavy drone is not an accomplishment
>b-but it's really heavy

And? You think making a heavy drone is some technical challenge?

Does the computer have to do more work to lift it? Maybe the computer needs to push on the controls harder?

>As in the US has not achieved anything significant on a 20 ton drone
neither has russia, given how this unmanned meme has yet to fly.

>As in the US has not achieved anything significant on a 20 ton drone. I guess whatever floats your boat.

Attached: vatnik.png (205x246, 20K)

Do you also know that Russia has T-I-G-E-R-S

The US gave up on the X-47B and is being displayed in museums. I will screen shot this board to make a bet that the Okhotnik will fire a missile before the phantom ray if that happens expect a lot of shitposting from me.

Gave up on a drone now in museums

Attached: kek.jpg (800x450, 40K)

>"it will happen eventually!"
yeah, because this thing is totally going up in the air when they cant even get the PA-FAilure right.

>>"it will happen eventually!"yeah, because this thing is totally going up in the air when they cant even get the PA-FAilure right

Why do F-35s keep crashing?

you know what else is in museums? russia's hopes and dreams.

>expect a lot of shitposting from me.

Can you really shitpost more? That would be an impressive achievement, unlike heavy drones.

>The US gave up on the X-47B and is being displayed in museums.

They were going to display the Kuznetsov at museums too, but it can't really get to one.

Anyway, answer the question - why do you think building a heavy drone is impressive?

because they are actually in use, unlike the PAK-FA.

X-47 was a tech demonstrator

130 by 2040

because they are actually in use, unlike the PAK-FA

F-35s still undergoing block upgrades.

>you'll be seething when you see Russia's true strength

Yes, I've heard that a million times. It never happened. That link though. I like the last paragraphs where he's basically making a retarded point and patting himself on the back for "winning" an online argument that he didn't even win.

The Patriot worked well, it's just that it's a bit more complicated than just hitting all targets or not. For example, if you're protecting a specific target, a successful hit might end up being considered a failure if you're trying to protect a city, since civilians can also be harmed by randomly falling debris. This is based on what happened with the Patriot in Israel too.

As for the S-400, I think people are trying to generalize its maximum performance too often. Take the long range missiles. Against stealth they rely on long wave radar for loose targeting and their own radar to find the target. This means that the system is very vulnerable to jamming and decoys. It also means that it has a low success chance against stealth. Yet the system takes a huge risk when launching these missiles, because they're huge and only available in small numbers. But what's the alternative? Not doing anything against stealth?

Attached: vatnikistanstronk.jpg (531x640, 61K)

>Can you really shitpost more? That would be an impressive achievement, unlike heavy drones.

20 tons is considered super heavy

>They were going to display the Kuznetsov at museums too, but it can't really get to one.

Anyway, answer the question - why do you think building a heavy drone is impressive?

Impressive that the US gave up on a similar project to this. Fucking ouch.

and the PAK-FA is still in its prototype phase.

>muh sides

Man, sometimes I argue FOR Russian tech and I get mad at you guys for trolling, but now I understand the joy of trolling raging vatniks

>20 tons is considered super heavy
>Impressive that the US gave up on a similar project to this. Fucking ouch.

Now I am convinced that you are copying and posting talking points your manager gave you. Keep running away from the question.

>The Patriot worked well, it's just that it's a bit more complicated than just hitting all targets or not. For example, if you're protecting a specific target, a successful hit might end up being considered a failure if you're trying to protect a city, since civilians can also be harmed by randomly falling debris. This is based on what happened with the Patriot in Israel too.

The Patriot in Saudia Arabia literally turned around and almost hit the area it was protecting, so that can't be used as an excuse. This is during the Yemen conflict if you want to look it up.

The Patriot HAS intercepted SCUDs successfully but they truly are legacy & slow. Still not bad.

>But what's the alternative? Not doing anything against stealth?

Again, we come back to the Tomawhawk strikes in Syria that Russia knew about in advance.

It has ZERO excuse other than "S-400 doesn't work as advertised, and neither does Pantsir or Buk"

>>muh sidesMan, sometimes I argue FOR Russian tech and I get mad at you guys for trolling, but now I understand the joy of trolling raging vatniks and the PAK-FA is still in its prototype phase

pretty much like the F-35 but slapped with an operational sticker. Su-57 is newer.

>Now I am convinced that you are copying and posting talking points your manager gave you. Keep running away from the question.

Just learn to tell the difference that's all.

>pretty much like the F-35 but slapped with an operational sticker
at least the F-35 can have enough produced to warrant said sticker. its been how long and with how many PAK-FAilures built? lmao

>at least the F-35 can have enough produced to warrant said sticker. its been how long and with how many PAK-FAilures built? lmao

like no DIRCM tested or reached the block upgrade for it, having a computer replaced recently like the SU-57. I honestly don't see the big difference between the two XD. One is a prototype and the other is just a prototype with a I am operational sticker.

Which is more pathetic, that it broke down during its reveal, that their recovery vehicle is incapable of recovering or that the Russians are so incompetent that they can't even train their soldiers how to drive in a straight line?

Attached: armata-breakdown.jpg.dfb0e8c82c2b63d6f924db638de0d818.jpg (1024x477, 79K)

>Just learn to tell the difference that's all.
>1 vatnik BTFOing whole board.

You mean one vatnik running away from the question for the entire thread.

Let's refocus here - what do you think makes a 20 ton drone a technological achievement?

>success rates vs anecdotes
The Patriot worked well, it just never was fantastic. Maybe it's because it wasn't using a GaN AESA, since apparently that thing has magical properties according to vatniks.

>I honestly don't see the big difference between the two
one is in service the other is a money laundering scheme for sukhoi.

new tank, not enough time for crew to operate it.

US and NATO seem to proud to lose to enter the army games they have.

>You mean one vatnik running away from the question for the entire thread.Let's refocus here - what do you think makes a 20 ton drone a technological achievement?

What makes it an achievement is that one country is still pursuing a project while the other is hosting there's in a museum lol.

>operate it.
you mean drive in a straight line without turning the parking brake on when its moving? do you think russian tankers are like chimps that need years of training to do the simplest task?

>one is in service the other is a money laundering scheme for sukhoi.

featureless aircraft in service to be correct

if two people shove cucumbers up their assholes and one of them says "that was fucking stupid" while the other keeps going, does that make the person still sticking the cucumber up their asshole more intelligent?

well it has one feature: its usable. unlike sukhoi's flying TORtanic.

>you mean drive in a straight line without turning the parking brake on when its moving? do you think russian tankers are like chimps that need years of training to do the simplest task?

different controls different designs. I would like to see how competent the US. Others say a defect part and such shit does happen.

>What makes it an achievement is that one country is still pursuing a project while the other is hosting there's in a museum lol.

So you think Russia is superior because it's picking up scraps left over by the US after it was done with a tech test?

>if two people shove cucumbers up their assholes and one of them says "that was fucking stupid" while the other keeps going, does that make the person still sticking the cucumber up their asshole more intelligent?

It means one gave up climbing a mountain and the other still continues.

>well it has one feature: its usable. unlike sukhoi's flying TORtanic.

Any trash can be deemed usable.

>different controls different designs
"how to drive in a straight line" should not be a hard thing to do with a modern tank. either the tank is hilariously over engineered or the person driving it has never seen an automobile before.

>Any trash can be deemed usable.
and what does that say about the other trash can thats so bad that it cant even get the same treatment?

>how to drive in a straight line" should not be a hard thing to do with a modern tank. either the tank is hilariously over engineered or the person driving it has never seen an automobile before.

Could be an overengineered issue, could be incompetence although I would like to see US personell try a complete brand new different design in a parade, or it can be a defect part.

>continuing with a vehemently retarded idea is equivalent to climbing a mountain
just dont freeze to death at the top.

>and what does that say about the other trash can thats so bad that it cant even get the same treatment?

other trash got some upgrades before the operational trash got the same.

>I would like to see US personell try a complete brand new different design in a parade
sorry, but most of the US's civilians could know how to drive something in a straight line if they were given at least 5 minutes of prep time.

>just dont freeze to death at the top.

yes something would be deemed retarded when a fanboy realizes his team is losing.

so the SU-57 never got any upgrades from when it was released? sheesh no wonder its taking so long.

Attached: le shitpost face.png (1145x1132, 11K)

>It means one gave up climbing a mountain and the other still continues.

Kind of like pic related? Except it never made it into service, bummer.

So they're SO incompetent that they can't even figure out how to train someone to drive in a straight line?

Attached: berkut.png (313x161, 61K)

>sorry, but most of the US's civilians could know how to drive something in a straight line if they were given at least 5 minutes of prep time

still sticking to one possibility without others in mind is this the definition of being narrow minded? There are some soldiers in the US that cant march in a straight line does that make Russian soldiers more competent by your standards?

>doing what someone else has already done well after they found out it was stupid is "winning" to vatniks
well that explains a lot.

>so the SU-57 never got any upgrades from when it was released? sheesh no wonder its taking so long.

Like a newer computer before the F-35. sure

>does that make Russian soldiers more competent by your standards?
not when said soldiers are given command of one of the countries newest tanks. or are russian logistics just so bad that they cant even organize a parade correctly?

>Kind of like pic related? Except it never made it into service, bummer.

old parts still undergoing updates that an unoperational aircraft is getting before the operational aircraft.

I can finish my job half way as well but I do not want a hack job.

>So they're SO incompetent that they can't even figure out how to train someone to drive in a straight line?

Incompetent as US soldiers not marching a straight line.

you cant really call it a replacement when the first one was never any good in the first place :^)

>not when said soldiers are given command of one of the countries newest tanks. or are russian logistics just so bad that they cant even organize a parade correctly?

Has the US organized any parade of significant size?

>I can finish my job half way as well but I do not want a hack job.

And this thread is done. You basically admitted that they are finishing out a piece of shit that will never be adopted.

Yes you throw tantrums when your team loses in games. US sure does watch a lot of sports.

>I can finish my job half way as well but I do not want a hack job.
but the SU-57 isnt even halfway finished. its like saying youve moved past the alpha stage of development but then saying the beta is your finished product when you cant figure out how to get any further.

>And this thread is done. You basically admitted that they are finishing out a piece of shit that will never be adopted.

Admitted that its not a hack job like the F-35? This sure does say a lot about you and this board. And that is doing the bare minimum and not the max amount.

I done responding to 5 or 10 different posters here.

yes. even our civilians can organize parades of significant sizes.

>Yes you throw tantrums when your team loses in games.
well that might be how Russia likes do things but the rest of the world sees this as childish. especially when its your own military that throws said tantrums. :^)

>Admitted that its not a hack job like the F-35?
at least said "hack job" is being used, whereas the most action the PAK-FA has gotten is escorting putin in his airliner.

>hack job
What kind of retarded comment is that? The F-35 is a good single engine aircraft with a fantastic sensor suite (better than that of the Su-57 mind you), the best stealth ever made, the most advanced datalinks, and all-around good performance.

The Su-57 is still in early production (where the F-35 was in 2011 or so), yet isn't going to have great performance anytime soon. The F-35 uses a frontal radar with more T/R modules despite being much smaller. Get your head out of your ass.

Thread summary:

>OP posts PR piece
>posts a bunch of "it will do this in the future"
>fails to establish that it is advanced tech even if it did everything that was promised

I just don't understand, if it didn't break down, why was the recovery vehicle so shit that it couldn't move it when its entire job is to move heavier equipment? Why couldn't they just train the crew? Why were they so stupid to not train anyone?

Nice work Russia! You're only 8 years behind Turkey now!

Attached: Turkey drone bayraktar tb2.jpg (645x344, 27K)