Gay and trans people should be allowed to own gu-

WHOA?! WTF?? I SUPPORT GUN CONTROL NOW????

>One shooting involving the mentally ill happens. ONE.
I doubt your statistics, sir.

Organized society is dependent on authority wielding force to maintain order. Ancapistan is an adolescent fantasy land.

I'm perfectly OK with them having guns, that means when they invariably lose their shit they're armed threats. Armed threats usually don't land you in prison when you kill them.

Mandatory CCWs for trannies when?

Well then give up your guns to the authority figures.

>Please deprive this group I dislike of their rights
>Surely this will never be used against me

find some more user, I'll wait.

Attached: 1555442520371.png (737x723, 144K)

That cute gay twink on the left just need a good dicking from a straight guy, like me.

authority =/= authoritarianism

Ancapistan is a fantasyland but a weak central gov. isn't. The "best" government would manage foreign affairs, infrastructure, a sizable navy and not much else, maybe a small corps of professional soldiers and a cadre of officers to form the core of an army to be raised in times of crisis. Leave the rest to the states.

>implying the vast majority of people who do shit like this aren't mentally ill.

correct

I'm not him, but just a minute in google gave me this.
baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/harford/aegis/news/bs-md-moseley-20180920-story.html

No, it's not common, but also no, the CO shooting wasn't the first.

It doesn't take mental illness to kill people, user.
When you perceive the public/your classmates/etc to be "the enemy", the mentality of the person is the same as fighters in any other conflict. Mental illness isn't the issue, the issue is "Why did someone believe the public/your classmates/etc to be an enemy worthy of death"?

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, you statist faggots.

Okay, fine! Jesus Christ, you asshole...

>Well this is like that illness
No almost every single one of the people who do this are doped up on SSRIs and have some form of pyschosis and are societal outcasts/bullied intensely. Or have you NOT been paying attention to every one of these school shooters medical histories? Just because you don't like someone's life choices doesn't mean they're crazy.
Still a much smaller case basis then people who are stuffed full of anti psychotics.
Basically shall not be infringed just because someone doesn't like how you live your life.

Attached: 1445298385307.png (143x222, 34K)

If you post stuff i already assume that you are also into trannies among other things, because hentai is a slippery slope, and i don't see why would someone like one degenerate thing but hate one other slightly more degenerate thing.

How heavy are those goalposts? Asking for a friend

>almost every single one of the people who do this are doped up on SSRIs and have some form of pyschosis

So....they're mentally ill?

Tha's true. There are plenty of mentally ill people who don't bring harm to themselves or others, the problem exists in that some people get so deep into whatever that they think it's acceptable to start hurting & killing random people. They get radicalized in the pursuit of some cause. It can happen to someone of any group and the real problem lies in identifying potential warnings signs and trying to help that person before they feel like they have no other option but violence. I'm not sure there is a surefire answer for how to prevent someone from becoming a radical.

>Anti-gun-control until someone I don't like wants guns
lel

Attached: LaurenSouthernSmirk.jpg (900x900, 179K)

My reaction as well.

Using your logic whites shouldnt be allowed to own any guns

Making way too much sense partner. Watch your fuckin back

Attached: CB30E4E1-F35A-420F-A1A3-0695FF877398.jpg (750x765, 709K)

Society is a mistake

Here's number 2. You're off by at least 100%.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Holmes_(mass_murderer)

I've already given my dog to my brother in law.

I never said it was the only case user, i was implying that it wasn't nearly common by any means even compared to the average shooting. Which isn't even common statistically. Anyone trying to use "shootings" for gun control is a dishonest piece of shit in my estimation.
Find being a fag in the DSM for me chief. One of these things is not like the other etc. Regardless of your own opinion on trannies, traps, twinks whatever the fuck, they still have the same rights a you, you'll just have to deal with it, its not going to change.

>psychotic school shooters doped up on SSRIs aren't mentally ill because trannies got removed from the DSM in a political stunt

kek, are you even listening to yourself?

How did you come to that conclusion user? Where did I say that SSRI pyschos are the same thing as fags, in fact i pointed out that they aren't.

>I never said it was the only case user
>One shooting involving them happens. ONE.

Oh
I didn't intend to sage this but my phone autofilled it

why don't you re-read the reply chain.

Statists gotta state. He probably loves the NFA and Hughes amendment.

>hentai
I posted ecchi you fucking newfag

Doesn't matter. Read the post.

He did you smallbrain, that's not hentai. Hentai is explicitly pornographic in nature, ecchi is just lewd.

SHALL

What was even the motive for this shit?

But it doesn't matter.

It does matter, because your entire premise is flawed. If you want to call pornography degenerate I agree, whether it's animated or not, but ecchi is no more degenerate than a fucking swimsuit edition of Sports Illustrated.

Devon Erickson and Maya McKinney(the tranny) shot and killed King Kunta.
Rest in Peace my nigga
youtube.com/watch?v=hRK7PVJFbS8

Or a vintage Playboy magazine

>be me
>google LGBT shooter

>it's a bunch of articles about the Pulse nightclub shooting
>(which was also perpetrated by a frustrated closet gay)

why the fuck was this story buried so effectively

But a vintage playboy is pornography, And therefore degenerate too, and ecchi can actually be very degenerate, as evidenced in pic related.

Attached: 9b7e5cf6dc76b00c2abdd41e989f426d6a549b55.jpg (632x966, 76K)

Being a fag was in the dsm until 1973 when political pressure overrode common sense

Look where we are now

Take a guess

It's a (((mystery))).

Every one of the founding fathers believed that the government they were creating was only possible with honorable men. Allowing mentally faggots to take part is the exact opposite of what this country was founded on. Fuck off with your modern anarchism.

It is definitely a mental illness...trannies are easy to 5150, so you can easily get their 2A rights taken away no problem.

>whites should be allowed to own gu-

Not all white people are mentally ill...All trannies are.

>covered in jism
>not explicity pornographic

just because she's not nude doesn't mean it's not pornographic. Likewise nudity doesn't = pornography. And vintage playboys are no more pornographic than this painting or a Greco-Roman statue.

Attached: Liberty_Leading_the_People_Eugene_Delacroix_oil_on_canvas_1830.jpg (1021x574, 159K)

Except that bitch is repulsive and nobody is gonna jack off t

I ll just wait a few days until we know more about those 2 and/or user digs up old statements of those shooters

>government was only possible with honest men
They believed that dishonest men were an inevitability and crafted a government that limited the power those dishonest men that would eventually rise to power. Gun control is and always will be a pandora's box where one law simply opens up the public to more laws, politicians bribing their constituents with the promise of safety at the cost of liberties. This happens with gun control, it's happened with the TSA and NSA, as well as the expansion of the American police's powers.
Even if fags not having guns reduced the crime rate, which it won't to any noticeable degree, it still doesn't justify allowing the government more power, which they will eventually and inevitably abuse.

fag

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." -John Adams

We are no longer a country full of good and moral people, which is why our country is failing

>John Adams
federalist scum detected

Attached: TJ_deal_with_it.jpg (480x360, 12K)

fags and trannies aren't people so they have no right to lbierty

gas all queers, hang all trannies

based

I love the founding fathers, but they not gods, and shouldn't be looked at as flawless.

They were flesh and blood like you and I, and while they held some strong beliefs that are forever relevant, they held many others which I think don't hold up as strongly to scrutiny, and they committed many crimes in their days.
George Washington himself got started by betraying the American people with the whole Whiskey Rebellion thing before the bodies of the revolutionary war had even grown cold.

How honorable were they themselves?

He didn't betray anyone. Anarchists like you are leftist scum who will let principles destroy any hope of having a functional government. You all belong in front of a State (but not Federal) sanctioned firing squad.

honorable enough to recognize homos are subhuman scum

Kind of like how ethnats often espouse Jeffersonian principles yet gloss over the fact he was rawdogging his slaves and fathering mutt children with them?

Trans should be allowed to have guns but only to anhero.

Why don't you just call your state 'Daddy' while you're at it?

A bit like that too, yeah.

>leftist
>defined by being in support of an overbearing government
>anarchists are leftist scum
u wot m8?

>leftist

Attached: spurdo monitor.jpg (585x682, 56K)

He was a hypocrite but the principles he espoused are still sound.

You closet Marxists are disgusting trash. Not everyone views the state as a newborn god like Hegel and his unholy spawn. States are a creation of me and my like-minded friends, family and neighbors. And we exclude perverts like you for the protection of our children.

We'll come on over there bootlicker and try to tell me what to do

Originalist Constitutionalism is not marxism you absolute mongoloid.

The commies have been telling you what to do for 100 years and you haven't done shit. You or your fathers surrendered their machine guns and explosives without so much as a fight. Tell me about how you're such a brave freedom fighter.

My point is, porn is porn. And that picure of iowa is porn, even if it doesn't contain complete nudity.

Nothing in the original constitution forbids a state (not the federal government, the state) from banning fags and niggers from owning guns. There was nothing wrong with this set up, fags are child molesters and niggers are violent animals; a state that let them be armed would fail pretty quickly.
What you're proposing is modernist anarchism, a leftist ideology.

>THINK OF THE CHILDREN
Every time. It's astounding how you completely lack the self-awareness to observe the similarities between you and the SJWs.

>Whiskey Rebellion
>Taxes were politically unpopular, and Hamilton believed that the whiskey excise was a luxury tax and would be the least objectionable tax that the government could levy. In this, he had the support of some social reformers, who hoped that a "sin tax" would raise public awareness about the harmful effects of alcohol.

You people have never changed, not once in centuries.

>For the last time, Jefferson, we're not having a line about "fiiiine bitcheſ with big bootieſ" in the declaration of our independence from Great Britain!

>nothing in the original constitution forbids a state from banning X from owning guns
SHALL

>SHALL
They didn't own guns dumbass, they stole their parent's firearms. I'm all for fags right to bear arms as long as they only use a gun on themselves in their eventual suicide.

>The original constitution
Makes no mention of the right to bear arms. That's why it's the second AMENDMENT.
Just like the thirteenth, fourteenth, and nineteenth amendments came later on (going through process intended by the founder & framers) to prove once and for all that the United States will not be a nation catering only to a certain group of citizens. It's a settled issue, either everyone has rights or nobody does. Fuck your feelings and being personally offended by the existence of those who are different.

Attached: 1423039110107.jpg (3112x2338, 1.54M)

>closet marxists
How does that even work, you fucking clown? lol

Attached: mcgas.png (793x794, 273K)

Welp. Wonder where on Jow Forums my thumbnail ended up?

looks like it got switcharoo'd with something mocking Vatniks, it's probably still here on Jow Forums somewhere.

Go back to discord

Based neoconfederate poster

Attached: disdain_for_yanks.png (341x512, 355K)

Could conservation and land management be done on as a private effort?

Commercial hunting is kind of one of the few bans I think are good at all.

>generalizing a loose group of people based on the actions of a few
Sounding pretty liberal here, anons.

Dangerous freedom > safe subservience

>liberal
Leftist. Say "leftist", or "authoritarian". Just because they co-opted the word "liberal" and completely destroyed its meaning doesn't mean you have to use it the way they do.

wake up, cow.

youtu.be/Xbp6umQT58A

Attached: 1555664754332.jpg (563x720, 149K)