/ch/ - changposting general

Sort of related - in WW2 they sometimes sprayed the fuel at the target first, then ignited it with a short burst of flame. I think they usually did this with tank flamethrowers that had long range, to get more fuel on the target.

This gave the people inside the target area a small chance to escape but I suppose the extra reaction time was something along the lines of 5-10 seconds. Not much time to evacuate.

>This gave the people inside the target area a small chance to escape but I suppose the extra reaction time was something along the lines of 5-10 seconds
Personally, I'd rather burn an empty bunker than a full one.

Either way, not sure why the chinks didn't steal this idea yet. Way more effective and safe than a flamethower.

youtube.com/watch?v=mkFU7o3IAaM

not even a chang poster, but I found some interesting pics of a chinese company thats breaking into the PMC industry

Attached: service_items_1.png (534x359, 308K)

Attached: service_items_2.png (534x414, 395K)

Attached: service_items_6.png (534x409, 332K)

Is 'breaking into the PMC industry' a euphemism for bribing someone in the CCP to hook them up with no bid contracts for chink companies in africa? Because that's the only way I could see anyone agreeing to pay for chink PMCs instead of the dozen or so Western and Russian groups that have members with proper training and real world combat experience.

Attached: anti piracy.jpg (1024x599, 78K)

>premium anti cut anti climb fence str8 out of Nanchang

Trump should tack weld some of this to his wall to stop Mexicans shimmying up the bars with a lineman's harness.

Attached: anti cut fence.jpg (700x468, 61K)

>now with 3x magnification

Attached: 1563843540210.jpg (1200x675, 118K)

>but user, how will the DF21 hit anything?
>andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Chinese-Anti-Ship-Ballistic-Missile-Development_Book_Jamestown_2013.pdf

Read this, everything mentioned in IOC is now fielded.