>Legally, how was the ATF allowed to completely ban the ownership of bumpstocks without any type of amnesty or registration time period without offering compensation.
I thought you were required compensation by law for your shit.
Legally...
Ryder Gomez
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
wboc.com
masslive.com
justice.gov
washingtonpost.com
twitter.com
Colton Gray
>Thinking Trump, the GOP, or Executive Branch gives a flying fuck about you, your rights, or fair value of your property
Tyler Rogers
has anyone anywhere been arrested fined or otherwise fucked with for having one?
Jonathan Green
literally who the fuck cares about laws or the ATF at this point
do the rest of us a favor and blow your brains out you retarded cunt
Kevin Roberts
>I thought you were required compensation by law for your shit.
Why did you think this?
Cite the law that you belive grants this right.
Kevin Parker
Because it's not a gun
Brody Davis
the ATF has never ever won any case regarding pistol braces bumpstocks binary triggers etc in any state
Julian Ramirez
Because it was an executive order. Big difference, legally speaking.
Levi Cooper
>how was the ATF allowed to completely ban the ownership
Shoelace, belt-loop, etc.
Michael Bennett
Holy fuck you glowniggers calm down. I just wanted the legal justification for how this was even allowed to pass without being thrown out of court.
Why would that matter?