Probably because binary triggers arent illegal, bumpfire stocks are too new, and they kind of screwed themselves into a corner with braces. What else would you be referring to?
Legally...
by ruling that you had a post 86 MG and were in illegal possession of one as a non FFL holder
basically there is no justice in this country if you're a gun owner
Shoelaces are classified as machineguns when niggerrigged to your rifle.
No they aren't
>Holy fuck you glowniggers calm down.
Fuck your fucking mother you illiterate fucking Mongoloid. Do your own research you lazy, stunned cunt.
Now say it with me,
"I was wrong and was intentionally spreading misinformation"
You first.
>pass
Thats the legislative branch
>court
Judicial branch
Executive does what they want, stop being emotional
Yes, they are. The 2004 letter was vague and poorly worded. The 2007 letter from ATF Technical clarifying it made it clear that a shoelace applied to a gun in such a manner as to increase it's rate of fire constitutes manufacture of a machinegun.
Binary triggers and pistol braces arent illegal. So why would they?