Why dont we see kore terrorist attacks with chlorine gas? All it takes is bleach and ammonia

Why dont we see kore terrorist attacks with chlorine gas? All it takes is bleach and ammonia

Attached: chlorine-gas.png (470x264, 64K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=GmULc5VANsw&list=PLHTeAiqTTlUiqrbi3SbxnmsizDignqgWp&index=5&t=394s
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

nice try glownigger

Fire is simpler and more destructive.

because it’s a heavy gas and can be seen from miles away

It doesn't spread very well and it takes a lot of bleach and ammonia.
In fact just spraying bleach or ammonia into people's faces would probably. E more effective.

It happened at a furry con a few years ago iirc

Gas attacks in general just don't work that well. The gas spreads unpredictably and isn't as lethal as you might think. It's really only good for spooking people or causing casualties in confined spaces.

ARM keeps those CORE faggot in check.

Two reasons. Firstly, terrorists are retards. Its the same phenomenon where most mass shootings end in single digit body counts, because the sorts of people who become mass shooters and terrorists are the sorts of people who have consistently failed at everything in life. Secondly, chemical weapons are shit. The best example is Aum, where smart shrewd terrorists still failed to kill more than 13 people, even though they were fully equipped to wipe out thousands, simply because their dispersal method was poor. Alternatively look to WW1 as an example, where the wind might change and your cloud of gas drifts back to friendly positions or harmlessly skyward.

Wasn’t actually the furfags fault?
I remember a news story years after about it being diapers or some shit?

You gonna control the wind too?

Quick google search says they never found out what happened.

Attached: 0A4A89CD-4E04-4B94-B859-5A938D625903.jpg (225x225, 8K)

Putting 30% sulfuric Acid inside a few lbs KCN would do a better job... you cant smell it and wont know it unless your a chemist with receptors inside the nose (only 30% have it)

Because we're kubists. We're paralyzed from violence because of the knowledge that they will use it to further infringe on the 2A.

Nah you're thinking of that furry convention when a bunch of faggots were wearing diapers and leaving them lying around at the hotel they were posted at:
Go to 4:10
youtube.com/watch?v=GmULc5VANsw&list=PLHTeAiqTTlUiqrbi3SbxnmsizDignqgWp&index=5&t=394s

checked but they can't infringe on the 2A if you use easily obtainable materials to incite violence
>IEDs
>guns made of scrap
>melee weapons
etc.

because its not 1916 anymore

exactly the reason why they didn't continue to use it during WW1, it's unpredictable out in the open and useless unless you use a lot, and making a lot of chlorine gas will take a lot of resources. Firebombs and ieds are far more useful and effective.

>making a lot of chlorine gas will take a lot of resources
Didn't the Germans just use excessive and waste chlorine from their garment industry? I didn't think it was a resource intensive tactic.

Because ammonia on it's own, is way more scary than chlorine gas.

>guns made of scrap
This is almost certainly how you catch a terroristic charge though

We did, the State Department blamed Assad for it.

Attached: peggy hill combine the cleaning power of ammonia and the whitening power of bleach.jpg (690x500, 46K)

Thats true. And probably the best tactic. The problem i see with that idea is that there will be a few craftsmen in an organization that provide these things and if some doorkickers nab them or some spooks corrupt them, the organization has been dealt a crippling blow.
>Inb4 these things are simple we can develop many crafters
They may be simple for you because you are familiar with them and can form cogent sentences. But there are a woeful amount of people not inclined to be competent at crafting and working well with tools.
I've encountered it alot and it's baffling.
Also the inclination to use the professionally made weapons we cherish and fetishize is too strong. Jow Forums would end up dooming gun rights for everybody somehow. That's all assuming Kommandos could ever be united for anything serious, let alone very risky, which frankly seems like a joke.

They tried it at a furfag convention but it didn’t kill anyone sadly, only sent them to the hospital

Is ammonia gas really that much worse?
I know it's a caustic base, but seems pretty similar, really

>They may be simple for you because you are familiar with them and can form cogent sentences. But there are a woeful amount of people not inclined to be competent at crafting and working well with tools.
I weep for the future.

>All it takes is bleach and ammonia
That´s not chlorine gas, that's chloramine
But to be honest it doesn't really matter since both are equally ineffective at killing people unless they are locked in a small room with it.

Even so, wouldn't it be easy enough to do something like drop a backpack or briefcase sized chemical weapon in a subway, then hightail it out of there before the gas gets you? You're pretty much guaranteed to get at least dozens of people with it, if you do it when it's busy.

I appreciate this post but I question why it was made.

Attached: 627e16cff1c8e613e4ed115423c392a2.jpg (1440x1800, 951K)

They're going to abolish the constitution anyway once spics become the majority demographic.

Imagine the smell

Attached: Download.jpg (205x246, 7K)

Correct. It was used in Iraq, but didn't do very much. Those affected ran away and made a full recovery.

Nah. Gun companies will just shift marketing to spics. Make some gaudy, gold plated, cast steel guns for cheap. And Mexicans will eat it up and the 2a will remain

It's not illegal to make your own guns, nigger.

Just like they did in California, right?

Mex don't have control in California. Guess who does? Onions.

Just use a bomb then if you're gonna place a backpack anyway

Mexicans don't even have control in Mexico. Their only purpose is to serve as bioweapons and future slaves, and they don't care as long as their handlers keep promising them free shit.

Why bother with gas when you can just use a knife or a truck

It's the long nosed Eskimos

Think of the logistics. With an IED, all you need to do is make explosives, transport them, then detonate. In terms of the physical material, enough to cause a significant incident is portable by one person with extreme lethality. With a chlorine gas attacks, the logistics would be way more complex. You have to find a way to either combine the raw components into gas in situ or devise a mechanism which is concealable and safe for you to handle while transporting it to where it's going to go. When it gets there you need to have already planned a way to distribute it so that it actually kills people before dispersing into harmlessness. The kicker is that most obvious methods for dispersal of the gas involve trespassing, which adds another step to the whole thing where you might get stopped. With an IED, pretty much everyone gets caught in planning phase or gathering the materials, which is a good thing because all you potentially need to do with a completed device is walk or drive into a busy place, completely legally, to potentially kill hundreds.

>and they don't care as long as their handlers keep promising them free shit.

yeah, whites aren't like that at all, just those pesky brown people

Anhydrous ammonia, look it up.

Attached: based niggers.png (1804x2438, 635K)

>ethnic people don't want to vote for someone who is painted as a racist, rich old white dude

shocker

bombs and explosives are more effective and can be made almost as easily as some gas dispersal device.

The forbidden BRAPP