How can you defend against "Status 6"?

>How can you defend against "Status 6"?

Russians poor maintenance and budget. Like all Russian weapon systems, they are only as good as the people and money behind them. Like we have seen time and time again it's just a nuclear accident waiting to happen. Yes nuclear cruise missile's catching fire are nuclear accidents too.

>This device is about irradiating water.

Attached: 1381856368506.jpg (350x468, 27K)

You dont have to. Its vaporware.

But we don't drink seawater. So what's the point? Destroy a few ports and some fisheries?

Wait until the Russian crew inevitably sink the boat or are killed in a nuclear accident

Who said that thing is going to explode underwater and not right in the coast?
Also, we are talking about Tzar bomb 100MT or more.

Attached: Poseidon-Nuclear-Torpedo.jpg (800x445, 72K)

>Don't invade Russia in a first place. "Status 6" is a weapon of retaliation.
This. CNN-brianwashed westfaggots still seem to believe rancid Cold War era propaganda about evil Russians who want to steal their hamburgers and kill their freedums.
>Russian anti-sub tech is outdated AF
Lol, cool story.
Do fatniks sincerely think that no one sees beyond their propaganda bullshit?

>right in the coast

lol

>Russia is totally going to be invaded any day now goy! better keep giving money to the (((oligarchs))) and his pet Jewtin!

Any nuclear explosion at ground or sea level is going to waste an enormous amount of energy vaporizing dirt, sand, and water. There's a reason most strategic nukes are set to airburst.

Nobody gives a shit about slavpoors. Russia is basically white Zimbabwe. Nobody would want to deal with slavoids chimping out on the regular after an invasion.
Ironic thing is, they do their best to ignore the one potential enemy they should care about, because of how shit they know they are.

>do vatniks really think that anyone wants to invade russia?
Is this American common core "education" at work or is this moron just particularly retarded?

Wait isn't this the sub that only lasted 4 months before it sank or something. Lol slavs at sea.

Attached: 0l4p02siujqy.jpg (500x368, 54K)

>Nobody gives a shit
You sure squeal a lot about our actions, as does your faggot government, for someones who "give no shit" about it.

>says this after having zero reading comprehension
>thinking i'm a burger

lmao

Looks big and noisy. Should be easy to track and deal with.

>The Jew thing

Okay.

It's all about that sweet over pressure.

Attached: Status 6 doomsday.jpg (1280x720, 128K)

>Just give up all your nukes and geopolitical ambitions, m'kay? Murrika knows better.
Eat shit and die.

Attached: the face of eastern europe.jpg (1680x924, 476K)

>armatard already giving himself away

I love it.

>you see we need new equipment every 3 years or else the evil west will kill us all! please ignore that everyone else on the planet thinks that 40+ year old nukes are more than adequatet!

>Status 6 doomsday.jpg
Imagine the world without amerishit pestilence. A man can dream.

>The Jew thing
The richest courtiers in Putka's entourage have Yid names.

USA couldn´t even track ARA San Juan submarine in Argentina coast.

That nuclear torpedo has probably countermeasures to not be found.

>No need for new weapons, let the soviet legacy rust away and let's all be "friends" under murrika's guidance
Been there seen that in 1991. Never again. Eat shit and die, faggot.

Problem is it's said to be really fast, not sure we have anything in store that can intercept it reliably.

One day soon you will all see the truth. This Iranian oil thing isn't a Jew thing, it's an Arab thing. They want total control over oil distribution and America is more than happy to help them to gain control. This is going to back fire horribly.

>Better buy 30 of these brand new planes every 2 years! otherwise the west will get us! please ignore your quality of life and the fact that our economy is based entirely on a single commodity

jej

It doesn't

The fact that russia is investing so much into nuclear delivery systems almost confirms that their current arsenal is worthless and they know it.

How sad.

>want total control of oil distribution and america is helping them

by being energy self sufficient?

How is it really fast? That isnt physically possible.

You're not wrong. The attempt at making a nuclear powered cruise missile is a tacit admission that they have absolutely zero faith in their navy.

Or their current icbms and airforce. They are basically admitting their nuclear triad is defunct.

Any thing moving 'fast' under water is very noisy. For some reason the Russians haven't learnt after 20 years of their subs being shadowed but oh well.

War is coming to Iran and soon. This isn't about self sufficiency.

You still haven't explained your conspiracy theory.

No it isnt. If trump starts a war with iran that will end his presidency.

Theres zero justification for attacking iran.

The Jews did it.

>Nobody gives a shit about slavpoors.
Except the Congress and Senate. Who are all about "Russia is responsible for anything".

that's democrats trying to play politics

And the justice department that also backs up that russia interfered in 2016.

Many people in this thread underestimate this nuclear torpedo.

Tzar bomb could have been 100MT 60 years ago. Imagine that giant water dildo nuke strength today.

Attached: Tzar.png (850x736, 544K)

Also the republicans, Pentagon and our intelligence agencies. Only trump denies it at this point.

>doesn't know anything about nukes
>thinks they just go up in power over time

If Russia icbms worked, why build this torpedo? Does this mean Russia's nuclear triad is defunct?

Why the hell is there so much writing on this drawing? Does anal rape need ANY explanation, let alone what I imagine is a paragraph's worth?

Probably captions for the screaming of the slav.

Because US ABM systems are going to work.

>If F-22 worked, why built this F-35

Attached: 1564201253449.gif (500x493, 631K)

Nobody gave a shit about Assad or Qaddafi either.

Just tells me there will be even more nuclear bullshit at the bottom since russian shit tends to not float very well. I look forward to ripping it from the sea floor K129 style to steal their (shitty) tech

>everyone else on the planet thinks
>The West sees Russia as clumsily clinging to old-fashioned concepts, unable to adapt to the modern world and its sophisticated ways. Russia, for its part, sees the West as an irresponsible belief-based actor who disregards reality in favour of trying to impose its own notion of how reality should be. Or in other words: the West thinks of Russia as of a person stuck in a geocentric worldview, who has never heard of Galileo or Copernicus. And Russia views the West as a New Age crackpot, trying to cure cancer with homeopathy, and creating catastrophes in the process.
ecfr.eu/article/commentary_what_does_russia_want_7297

and then starve, retard

>USA couldn´t even track ARA San Juan submarine in Argentina coast.
why would they be doing that in the first place?

Interesting point, i think

That's why you track the mothership instead and kill it before Status-6 deployment.

The f35 fills a different role than the f22.

I say again. If russia is spending all of its money on nuclear wunderwaffe, it is signaling to their world that their standard nuclear triad is defunct.

How does a nuclear tipped torpedo be a larger threat than 2k icbms?

Good news. The mothership already sank.

The nuclear triad and MAD.

This is the whole reason Russia is pretending to have this. It's to reassure the Russian people that they have a real and functional nuclear deterrent despite the increasing capabilities of Western anti-missile systems.

The most important thing to remember is that these things aren't supposed to fool anyone in the west. These are supposed to fool the 60% of Russians that believe the Russian federation has the most powerful navy in the world.

reuters.com/article/us-argentina-submarine-flight/u-s-navy-plane-scours-south-atlantic-in-search-for-argentine-sub-idUSKBN1DO23S

Seeing how Castle Bravo showed how poorly water stayed irradiated it's a stupid weapon. All it's good for is insuring MAD and making people anxious. Assuming they can get one of those things off in the first place. Russia has no money, it's military has very little strategic projection, they are cheap as shit. They have to advertise the shit out of stuff like this to hang on. If they are lucky they will build six of them and sit them in storage because they cannot maintain or secure them at sea. SOSUS will probably detect them and when they approach a coastline the nukes will fly.

That baby's at a depth that'll leave the bodies undisturbed for centuries.

>reuters.com/article/us-argentina-submarine-flight/u-s-navy-plane-scours-south-atlantic-in-search-for-argentine-sub-idUSKBN1DO23S
but this isnt tracking. this is a futile Search and Rescue searching for a sub sitting on the bottom at 1000m. Ofc planes wont find it

Its inferior to ICBMs, and cannot be used as first strike weapon.The only reason its developed at all is that russia is scared shitless of burger ABM technology. Other than the fact it cannot be intercepted in flight by ABM, it offers no other advantages over rockets.
You need to realise that its not meant to be a game-changer, its stopgap measure to keep game at least somewhat unchanged if burgers ever manage to get actually working ABM shield capable of stopping large scale attack.
Again, its completely useless as counterforce or first strike weapon, its purely retaliatory. Its only purpose is to give russia's enemies one last "fuck you" after russia is already destroyed in nuclear holocaust.

Of course the joke's on them, seeing how US coastal cities are libshit holes, and their destruction by radioactive tsunami would guarantee burger superiority for ages.

Interesting article, thanks user

>Russia is pretending
kek.
Bro, concept itself has literally nothing that wasn't tested before except, maybe, control system. And it's all Soviet tech. Supercavitation? They have that tech. Liquid metal cooled reactor? They build those decades ago and that tech wasn't abandoned. Titanium hull for a deep diving? Not a problem at all. So, tell me, what exactly is preventing Russia from putting together all that 80s tech and putting a modern computer for navigation?

It’s actually really hard to find a disabled sub, especially if it’s really down deep. Most forms of sub detection rely on finding any emissions it makes, or catching it while it’s on the move.

Attached: bulava.webm (1920x1080, 2.86M)

>supercavitation
Supersonic torpedoes sound scary, but are impossible to guide due to the very air bubble it relies in to suoercavitate.

>liquid cooled reactor
Lots of power generation but prohibitively expensive and wildly unsafe which proved largely beyond Russia’s ability to maintain on a wide scale.

>Titanium hull
Great in theory, but again, prohibitively expensive for a minor increase in dive depth.

no more nukes, please

Attached: ECB5v5lWsAARXCu.jpg (1024x576, 90K)

>supercavitation
>turning

>Russia views the West as a New Age crackpot, trying to cure cancer with homeopathy, and creating catastrophes in the process
This is surprisingly accurate of what the west is.

Attached: american military parade.jpg (1362x2345, 566K)

>ecfr.eu/article/commentary_what_does_russia_want_7297
>If we want a win over Russia – or to win Russia over
Westfaggots use this rhetoric left and right and then wonder why a Russian will never trust a westfaggot and will always keeps himself aware of a possible NATOscum invasion, lol. I struggle to come up with the name of this delusion yropoors and fatniks have.

Attached: our future is so bright i don't even need eyes to see it.jpg (599x418, 59K)

Imagine being so full of krokodil you can't even understand a simple sentense.

>Supercavitation
>range

Pick one

Read the article retard, the sentence is exactly about what it seems to be about. It's a very typical westfaggot rhetoric that they think Russians don't notice.

It’s a loud-ass supercavitating torpedo. It’d be easily detected once launched. Don’t see why it couldn’t be handled by an ADCAP.

If it's deep, then no it'll still be hard to detect and even harder to stop. If it's supercavitating, it's hard to stop just because of the sheer speed involved.

>How can you defend against "Status 6"?

No need to. It's a internal propaganda chew toy since russians as a group, have an eternal persecution complex and constantly need to feel as though they are standing strong against some vague western evil whose attack is always imminent. If recent history is to tell us anything, it's that Russian maskirovka has forced them to regularly announce and boast about doomsday superweapons which in reality, are too complicated for any slavic brain to design (muh space wars Mig 41, a fifth gen fighter that performs worse than the bloody Rafale and has been rejected by India, an exceptionally pathetic inability to understand stealth despite the fact that a Russian mathematician formulated the math for this domain)

No western country is actually interested in invading Russia, especially us western europeans. We wouldn't have any use for all that HIV, radiation, Islam, and rust. China might have its own hidden designs on Russia's territories, but as they are slowly dominating Russia through economics, they might not need to launch a land invasion after all. Burgers live on their own enormously wealthy continent so while they enjoy bullying Russians with endless NATO expansionism, I doubt that they actually care about Russia's territory. Perhaps, didn't they cuck vatniks out of alaska in the 19th century?

I always ask the russians living here (Netherlands) why they aren't interested in returning to Russia despite their endless praises and claims of Russian pride and superiority, and they are invariably embarrassed to admit that life in western europe is infinitely better than it is in 99% of Russia.

'Member when the Russians had two catastrophic accidents with miniatruized nuclear propulsion systems in the last two months?

It's a fucking doomsday weapon, you don't "defend" against such.

You're retarded, energy can't be "wasted" it's one of the first laws of physics. The energy of a nuke is transferred to the water, flash boiling it and producing a super powerful pressure wave. We learned that at Bikini Atoll.

This thing would take out a coastal city, easy. And then irradiate the coast thousands of miles around.

>China might have its own hidden designs on Russia's territories
Unfortunately for the Vatniks, this is far more likely than most people realize. Siberia is an incredibly rich supply of natural resources, and it's sparsely inhabited and not well connected to the rest of Russia. China may well end up Crimea'ing it within 2 decades.

>China may well end up Crimea'ing it within 2 decades.
They're already accomplishing that through economic vassalage.

Indeed. Not to mention that the Chinese are in a far better place (economically and militarily) to mount a land invasion of Russia than any one here in Europe or even the U.S. can. The only advantage that a European invader has is is that the terrain between here and Russia is less challenging than it would be for the Chinese. Though with all the MRBMs Russia deploys along its perimeter which China, we shouldn't assume that their own security planners have ruled out the possibility of a Chinese attack.

Yes it can be wasted, as heat. Retard.

>we shouldn't assume that their own security planners have ruled out the possibility of a Chinese attack.
Kek, far from it. Moscow is already pissed off about Beijing's growing influence in Central Asia through SCO, and more recently OBOR.

Ships with long hydrophone lines, its got a nuclear reactor right up against the hull, its going to be loud.

It isnt supercaptivating.