THEY'RE EVOLVING
alert5.com
S-70 model at MAKS shows flatten exhaust nozzle
Isaiah Sanders
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
John Cruz
Told you it's a prototype with an ordinary afterburner engine, which is longer due to the afterburning chamber. But no, amerishit didn't listen, amerishit only care about their shitty memes.
Brandon Adams
>Seems like Sukhoi intends to fix the biggest shortcoming of the S-70 Hunter-B UCAV.
What a retarded wording in regards to a prototype.
Carson Fisher
>i talked to a single user once and he made fun of me over many things, so now i am going to pretend that his banter on one thing was the opinion of everbody on this board.
If russians would stop doing this, maybe people would take them more serious.
Noah Richardson
lmao nice model, way to go russians. make a thread when (if) it flies
Adam Rodriguez
>a single user once
You must be new here.
Gavin Hall
I know you want to make the impression that everyone around here said that the current engine was the final version, but this aint the case. Also you are ignoring how a non stealth engine raises some eyebrows of people when they see it. You are intentionally trying to give the story an entire differnt spin, because people make fun of them using a substitute engine for such a long time and we are still have to wait to actually see the thing in OPs picture actually on the drone. You can consider yourself one of the reasons why russians are so much disliked on this board, it always comes down to a pretty simple narritive; it aint the question if there is something wrong with what you say, it is rather always what is wrong with it.
Inb4 banter posts are the whole boards opinion, Jow Forums is totaly horrible and i am a fatnik for whatever stupid reason.
Now that i look at the pictre, it would look so much more badass if it were flying in the other direction.
Christopher Baker
>I know you want to make the impression
No, I say the way it is. Every single S-70 thread gets shitted with ineducable mutts implying ignorant implications.
Jose Russell
Only 20 years behind the west.
Kevin Lee
It aint like you want to make the impression, not at all. Go to hui.
Logan Ramirez
dude it’s a jet cloaca lmao
Blake Scott
Oh, really? Name any other 20 tonne UACV in the world. Come on, I'll wait.
Josiah Gray
Yes, it ain't. Relocate back to sosach, clown.
Juan Scott
As if anyone ever set foot there unlike people like you.
Henry Cox
>If russians would stop doing this
The vatnik are paid to do this.
They need to pay people to write positive stuff and positive lies about the degeneracy of Russia, because in reality NONE EXIST.
You'll never get a word of criticism on Russia from them, this will get them fired. In fact, they do everything they can, from ad hominem to pure nonsense, to steer the conversation away from the failures of Russia.
Such is life in modern Russia, which is ripe for imposive destruction, once again.
Oliver Carter
Typical sosach deflection. You have to go back.
Michael Campbell
>sosacher talking about deflection and telling Jow Forumsommandos to go back to sosach
Why you idiots always do that? Now i can sit back and watch you make 20 more posts about me being a sosacher, because that is what you desided to deflect with and now you are set with it.
You make russians look bad.
Landon Thompson
And the ones that doesnt get paid, do it like their moms: for free.
Christian King
>Ur mum jokes
>I-i-i'm not a sosacher
Epic. Anyway, the fact remains fatnik amerishit ruined every other thread with their shitty memes about the exposed nozzle on a prototype. Now sosacher ameriboos deeply in denial are deflecting. Same as they did when Su-57 entered serial production, same as they did with every other piece of equipment they memed about when it entered production and service.
It's like a comedy gold and a nice slice of the ignorant ameristench society.
Owen Gutierrez
You guys know this thread is just going to be a giant shit flinging contest from both sides like every single one before it right? Can't we just not do the thread? It's pointless.
Samuel Jones
Shut the fuck up and go back to your containment board sub 70iq sosach cunt
Angel Hernandez
>spacing
Adam Barnes
Already squealing for a safe space, scumbag? Too bad, enjoy getting shat upon for ruining threads.
Cooper Butler
the guys who know don't enter these kind of threads my guy
Ian Harris
i'm just as surprised as you op. no one could have predicted that the prototype didn't resemble the final product. must be the first time this happened.
Jaxon Bell
Go home armatard
Gabriel Martinez
Choke on shit, amerilard.
Landon Lewis
If you dont want to be treated like an idiot, stop acting like one by making up stories to look like a victim when you are actually part of the group that causes the most trouble for themself and others ont this board.
You can continue to screech the rest of the day, doesnt change what everyone else saw and witnessed, you'll only look like more of an idiot.
Christopher Mitchell
>If you dont want to be treated like an idiot, stop acting like one
Perfect sententia to address the amerishit who shat every thread up with their ignorant memes about the nozzle on a fucking prototype.
Jayden Thompson
The F-117 X-47 and B-2 prototypes didn’t use nozzles
Daniel Green
And this thing did.
Christian Jenkins
That’s not American armatard
Jack King
Who said it is supposed to be american, amerilard stench? A prototype is a prototype.
Andrew Wood
Notice how I only mentioned prototypes of AMERICAN stealth aircraft prototypes or can you not properly comprehend English armatard
Mason Wilson
Yeah, just because you named 3 random names in your post doesn't mean my argument is supposed to be related to only american prototypes, amerilard stench. A prototype is a prototype.
Caleb Bell
Cool upgrade to make it more stealth..
But he looked bad ass with the exposed engine. :(
Luke Butler
So vatfrica needs to make a bloated oversized piece of crap to do what everyone else has been doing for 20 years?
Zachary Wright
>Got told
>Resorts to russophobic saliva-spitting
Typical ameristanch. No, lard-munching amerifag, so Russia is not 20 years behind the west, since the west doesn't have anything to the scale.
Luis Jones
Babushka is thinking suicide because of you, Armatard......
Jack Anderson
It is more the point where you have to adress how vatniks constantly shit on everyone all the time and get all offended when they get something back in their tone. The whinig is just endless and looking at how selfrightous you think you are in the right here and cant let go on something you give a pass on the regular done by vatniks and russians is pretty showing. How i can tell that you dont do that? Because non of you fuckers ever do and everyone already noticed that.
Ian Moore
>russophobic
Not a real word.
In any case, this drone is pathetic- only 2000kg of payload despite weighing 20 metric tons. The X-47 does that while weighing far less, and the X-45 could carry a pair of JDAMs or 8 SDBs, back in 2002.
Camden Cook
>russophobic
Did you mean russorealistic?
Nicholas Jackson
>It is more the point where you have to adress how vatniks constantly shit on everyone all the time and get all offended when they get something back in their tone
Quit projecting, it's the ameristench scum whoshit on every other piece of equipment in the world and in this particular case kept ruining S-70 threads by shitposting retarded ignorant memes about a nozzle of a fucking prototype. Eat shit and choke on it, lard munching amerifaggot.
Nicholas Perry
>The X-47 does that while weighing far less, and the X-45 could carry a pair of JDAMs or 8 SDBs, back in 2002.
To what range, amerishit lardfag?
Oliver Jackson
>Quit projecting
Why do vatniks always make answers that sound like they are ment for themself? It is kinda hard to not notice it, when you got it at one point.
Christopher Martin
>taking pic related for face value
Ishitty diggity
Kevin Robinson
Its a good decision for a drone but a shitty decision for a fighter. As a rule of thumb flat nozzle robs approximate 15% of thrust due to exhaust shaping and produces more friction heat...
The benefit is that its more radar stealthy and it mixes exhaust with air to lower exhaust plume radar return.
But I freaking hate it, drawbacks outweigh benefits by a LOT.
If you would stop calling everyone a russian who is familiar with their tech maybe people would take YOU more seriously Stacey.
Lincoln Green
>N-no u! U!
Talk to the nozzle.
Chase Roberts
What's the point of russia redesigning the nozzle? Itll never be more than a prototype and if it some how does reach large scale production like the su-57...wait..well atleast itll look cool in its current setup while the US black budget projects take it down without being spotted
Colton Fisher
>UCAV
Let's wait for this thing to be tested with any weapon.
Noah Cruz
Compating bombers prototypes with ucav prototypes.
Go to be fat somewhere else idiot.
Benjamin Gutierrez
>the US black budget projects take it down without being spotted
Going to the we have something better behind closed doors area-51 excuse. Than implying they themselves do no have any black projects.
Nicholas Wright
Well looks at it this way, war is won by economies. Now before I dive into this I'm not an expert so wont pull exact numbers because who really cares the truths obvious, the US has one of the biggest economies in the world Russias like what top 5? Top 10? The US has the largest military budget in the world by a very wide margin. Russias maybe top 5? And on top of that we have a black budget larger than our normal budget that is extremely classified and most likely full of spicy shit thatll ruin your day. This isnt even going into how much experience we've gotten from recent wars. The allies at play etc and even geographically if russias AF gets obliterated (not exactly hard) their navy sunk (its already doing it to itself it seems) and somehow in this USvs.RU conflict no nukes are used. How the fuck can Russia directly attack the US? We share land borders thanks to europe alliances, the worlds biggest navy the top 3 biggest airforce in the world and tons of other shit what the hell can russia do aside from nukes? And let's not even get into the daily people, how many russians would actually be willing to go toe to toe with the US in a conventional war? Anyone can have the fanciest equipment but if the people dont want to fight it's all paperweights
Jaxson Hill
>large scale production like the su-57
Wait, is it finally in proper production now?
David Miller
>war is won by economies
Vietnam
Not reading the rest of your shit post
Aaron Miller
>war is won by economies
What war, moron? WWIII? Enjoy getting nuked, and there is your "largest military budget in the world" gone in the nuclear fire. That's that, period.
Gabriel Wright
Wow if they made the planes a solid color they'd actually be hard to spot instead of just outlining them.
Leo Flores
ITT
Easton Sullivan
>Well looks at it this way, war is won by economies. Now before I dive into this I'm not an expert so wont pull exact numbers because who really cares the truths obvious, the US has one of the biggest economies in the world Russias like what top 5? Top 10? The US has the largest military budget in the world by a very wide margin.
Christ how many subjects are you going to switch into here you going from ahh shit design, ahh black project ahhh economies.
The US would have not been able to develop scramjet missiles if it wasn't for the soviet union assisting their program because they were broke after the collapse. PHODIR project in 2014 they have got photonic radars to the level of conventional radars but the Russians had succeeded with the usage of lasers to make better transmission efficiency hence superior radars in the future. Money does not buy critical thinking like Raytheon letting an Israel company work with the PACS-4 or letting the trophy be used instead of a quick kill APS developed by the US to be used on a tank.
Elijah Williams
>Vietnam totally wasnt supported by 2 of largest economies in the world that rivaled the US in that point of time guis
Also did you notice I strictly said if no nukes are used? No one wins a nuclear war but for the sake of conversation I stricter noted *somehow nukes dont get involved because they ultimately will and we all die*
Josiah Collins
It's in early production until at least 2020 if all goes according to plan. Then it should go into mass production. I don't think Russians are going to cut funding at that point. They'll order a decent amount eventually.
Isaac Garcia
I'm pretty sure it's so big because it's supposed to carry those big-ass anti ship missiles of theirs.
Dylan King
>Vietnam totally wasnt supported by 2 of largest economies in the world that rivaled the US in that point of time guis
China will be definitely supporting Russia in case of the US attack.
Alexander Hill
Their is a shitton of variables into defining who will win for what reasons etc so tried to do a brief overview of each, and every country will have its areas of expertise. In my opinion America never developed hypersonic or scramjet missiles because why? We had no real reason too until rival countries started making them, we have force projection. We have hundreds of ways to send missiles 10 miles off the coast of most countries why do we need a missle that can navigate the world at mach 10?
Owen Scott
Itd be delusional to think the US would attack russia, theirs nothing for us to gain, we have the resources, economy and living space we need right now. If we want to kill russia or china itll be through sanctions and trade wars before the first shots ever fires
Josiah Flores
>I strictly said if no nukes are used?
Literally no one cares what you said. Russian military doctrine explicitly states that any attack on Russia that endangers its existence will be responded to with a nuclear strike.
Alexander Young
Which makes any equipment boasting obsolete. Once that first nuke is fired every revenant county with nukes and satellites will pick it up fire their nukes etc. The only way itd be relevant go discuss USvsRU equipment in a war is to either ignore nukes or proxy wars which arent a fair comparison because the home countries wont/cant be brought to full force or wont be the ones using the equipment
Nathaniel Perez
>Which makes any equipment boasting obsolete
Yes, which is why Russians can mind their own business instead of getting involved in a pointless arms race. Do you seriously buy american propaganda about Russian military hardware or how Russians dream about stealing your hamburgers and democracy? Jesus Christ...
Luke Powell
Nice, new plane models for future near-future world war vidya
Jeremiah Morgan
>models
Brody Brown
I'd say I'm neutral, I dont care for our current government (im american) and believe it's an abomination of what the founding fathers intended and also dont agree with most of our international policies the only law I care for is the constitution and its beliefs as for russia, meh dont hate then dont like them even have some friends from there but youd be an idiot to disagree that theirs not a fairly sizable power difference I for one wish it was more balanced because competition breeds greatness. The only way we will survive is by technologically expanding time is our ally and our enemy who knows, tomorrow aliens could all of a sudden be real and really not fucking like us or our planet decides to kill itself. The main focus of humanity should be to learn everything possible about the universe, found out how we stack against other life out there cause come on, we cant be alone but how far behind or ahead are we? And we should also become the dominating species in our respective galaxy
Mason Nguyen
Which is why they’re constantly boasting about their new, super high tech fancy X that will totally bring the downfall of the West honestly, we’re serious this time guys!
Julian Thomas
>they’re constantly boasting about their new, super high tech fancy X that will totally bring the downfall of the West
When did they do this? Putin announced some new STRATEGIC weapons, that is weapons that can be used in accordance with Russian military doctrine if Russia's existance is in danger. No, hysterical CNN reports and shitty blogs like thedrive and nationalinterest don't count.
Austin Diaz
What actually happened was on the three occasions that I pointed this out was vatnik retards saying it was entirely unecessary and you can't make it stealthy so the round nozzle was fine))))
Lucas Perez
FAT NIGGER ARMATARD, BABUSHKA HATES YOU!!!
Isaiah Edwards
Asher Ward
búmp
William Hughes
>When did they do this?
Lurk at least some time on the board before you make yourself look like a total retard.
Brody Sanders
>on the board
No one gives a shit about this board. Jesus Christ, fucking millennial clowns thinking their blogs and twitter posts matter.
Gavin Cook
Don't forget the guy claiming a flying wing design wasn't chosen with the main purpose of being stealthy.
Caleb Bennett
See for reasoning.
And flying wing has benefits to construction and aerodynamics that are completely performance based. We built flying wings before radar even existed for a reason...
Do you think every faceted aircraft is stealthy too?
Samuel Baker
>make yourself look
Why are leftists so obsessed with appearances? Is it just social media?
Oliver Mitchell
Yeah I'm sure they removed the vertical control surfaces for better aerodynamics too.
Parker Smith
If I say F22 nozzles are flat to provide better stealth it doesnt mean it wont give better tvc and be eqsier to make as well. There can be more than 1 reason for a design decision you know....
Nolan Torres
>You guys know this thread is just going to be a giant shit flinging contest
>he doesnt know thats the point of the bait
Camden King
There's isn't always more than one reason behind every design solution. You don't remove vertical control surfaces as part of a trade-off, you do it because stealth requires it.
Carter Martin
Underrated Post.
Grayson Williams
Yes but the flying wing choice is clearly to pack in more fuel and weapons, plus for easier construction. MiG Skat tried the same thing.
Ian Williams
Nathaniel Anderson
I don't know what letter is assigned for drones in the NATO classification system, but I hope they'd find a way to name it for some synonym of "turtle".
Wyatt Adams
Lucas Lopez
I think scat is good enough, to be honest.
Jackson Carter
Thats an UAV desu.
Jackson Fisher
the model can have any shape of exhaust it likes, the factories won't be able to make that exhaust.
Matthew Clark
Lucas Powell
>No one gives a shit about this board.
>t. the most assblasted newfags
Now you are dumb on purpose.
Kevin Martin
Tell me, what does the letter "C" in "UACV" means? Also doubtful it's actually 20 tonnes.
Angel Harris
>the factories won't be able to make that exhaust
You realize even Soviets experimented with flat exhaust and deemed it useless for fighters.
Elijah Cox
Nice, the exhaust is flattened.
Is the intake an S-Duct?