.308 tavor

Thoughts?

m.youtube.com/watch?v=yF7j5bqHhLY&t=1168s

Attached: Screenshot_20190901-100714~2.png (1440x834, 1.34M)

Other urls found in this thread:

americanrifleman.org/articles/2017/11/29/tested-daniel-defense-dd5v1/
youtube.com/watch?v=UxGmusWYATE
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fox_and_the_Grapes
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Wasnt there someone posting on AK files how they just gave up on getting it accurate? I think it was something like 2MOA with match ammo.

Isn’t that within battle rifle requirements?

I think people generally say 3 moa for battle rifles, yeah.

oy vey!

I love Tim but I don’t have the time to watch the whole video. What happens?

Side note Tavors are overrated as shit and I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s a bad review

>Tim
>giving anything IWI a bad review
lol

I have both a 7 and an X95, Tim's opinions seem to echo my own on most points.

Trigger's great, the HK-style lock-up and slap-down is a great feature, Being able to swap between left and right handed in under a minute is nice (I'm a lefty), and the overall construction feels rugged.

It's not sub-MOA, and I don't know why AR10 boys feel the need to shit on it because it's not sub-moa. It's not a DMR, it's a battle rifle. It's minute of man, and that's all it needs to be.

Bonus fun is that it comes with a SCAR brake on it, so you can piss off everyone next to you at the range.

Also, Tim's CC price is too high. I got mine for $1750ish

>jewgun
trash

USMC qualification targets are 4 MOA at standard distances.