Body cam kino

youtu.be/2QQul-WKDx4

Attached: 1568421366895.png (1344x756, 1.13M)

Other urls found in this thread:

baltimore.cbslocal.com/2019/09/13/video-baltimore-police-tyrone-domingo-banks-shooting/
saami.org/faqs/#ammunition-firearm-chambered
youtube.com/watch?v=UllFP_CaAt4
youtu.be/v9vGHU1RsF0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

tfw you'll never see body cam videos from the 1920s.

Story? I hope that wasn't 556

>police use thermal cam
>can see the trail of heat from his fucking exhaust
Scariest part of this vid tbqhwy

>grip pod

Attached: 1539869456029.jpg (362x352, 14K)

Again SAAMI .223 and 5.56 NATO are designations for the chamber, not the cartridge. In essence, what you are stating is "I hope that wasn't a particularly hot round of 5.56x45mm"

>Full auto

What a chode.

Except the part where they're diffierent cartridges and neither SAMMI nor CIP recommends the use of 5.56 in a .223 chamber. Stop talking.

>Story
Nig decides to start shit. Gets nogged.
baltimore.cbslocal.com/2019/09/13/video-baltimore-police-tyrone-domingo-banks-shooting/

>I hope that wasn’t 556?
Dude what? The rifle?

That cop needs better training with his AR. I cringed up watching him flip it to fire and basically run around like that the entire time he wasn't actively engaging. Takes fractions of a second to flip it back and forth, your thumb literally rests on it

Who the fuck brought up full auto?
>neither SAMMI nor CIP recommends the use of 5.56 in a .223 chamber
The first ever cartridge with a 5.56mm designation was M193 Ball, fool. The M16A1 had a SAAMI .223 chamber and was proofed at 70,000 PSI

"Muggsy bagged one of those reeferheads with the BAR, head smash like a melon! We got it all on the stillshot!"

Attached: BodyCam.jpg (570x407, 28K)

>Except the part where they're diffierent cartridges and neither SAMMI nor CIP recommends the use of 5.56 in a .223 chamber
jesus christ nogunz,

The cop was firing in full auto in the video, ergo, a chode.

> The M16A1 had a SAAMI .223 chamber and was proofed at 70,000 PSI

No, it didn't. They're different cartridges and neither SAMMI nor CIP recommends using 5.56 in a .223 chamber because they're different cartridges.

Attached: hYB5uzp.jpg (3024x3024, 836K)

I'm sorry what was that nogunz, I couldn't hear you over the sound of SAMMI themselves telling you that you're full of shit.

saami.org/faqs/#ammunition-firearm-chambered

fags like you need to fucking die nobody in real combat does that larp shit.

> nobody in real combat does that

14 posts in and this thread is a nogunz noserve dumpster fire

Post a 5.56 rifle you own, right now.
>hurdur the lower says blah blah
Doesn't fucking matter.

Also find me 1 (one) case of a 5.56 causing failure in a .223 rifle. it is a nonexistant problem.

I'm the guy you were replying to and I'm literally an OIF vet 11b. We trained muscle memory over and over to operate our selector levers

This. The thermal on that police chopper is incredible. What the military has must be mindblowing

How about instead of desperately clinging to the fact that you hope I'm a nogunz you post something refuting the primary source wisdom of the literal standardization agency that is directly and categorically refuting you. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm far more inclined to believe SAAMI on this topic than I am some fucking rando on Jow Forums spouting bullshit.

Attached: Capture.jpg (1546x590, 99K)

lmaoing at your life faggot nobody does that shit. i was on 3 deployments and one with group and nobody used their safeties every time you went to low ready or aimed at the ground. go jerk off to a garand thumb video loser

>cop was firing in full auto in the video
Fucking where? Officers on the beat are not equipped with automatic firearms, those are kept in SWAT armories
>No, it didn't
Wrong, 5.56 NATO did not exist until the early 1980s, which means the M16A1 could not have such a chamber. The reason it and its cartridge were designated "5.56mm" was because it was trendy

>refuting
They aren't. They're saying they don't recommend it. They haven't refuted the fact that it has never caused a problem and is a nonissue. They also aren't refuting the fact that the cop is using a 5.56 rifle and you're a retard who has zero experience with firearms.

That's slack fucking training and a ate up unit. You can maneuver the safety lever simultaneously as your finger goes back on the trigger.

Really? Because there's a picture of a motherfucking M16A1 with a 5.56 roll mark in this fucking thread. Feel free to go ahead and post something reliable regarding the A1 having a .223 Remington chamber.

MOS? Post 214

>rollmark
Doesn't matter, the chamber is in the barrel. You can stamp whatever you want on the lower, it doesn't change the dimensions of the chamber.

>The people who write the standard aren't important because it's inconvenient for me.

Why would they go out of their way to specifically tell people to NOT do it if it's such a non issue? If they're the same cartridge as you proclaim. Look, I'm not the idiot that rolled up here barking about .223 and 5.56 being the same cartridge, because they're categorically not. I'm sorry you got blown the fuck out and are now ass ravaged to the point that all you can do is move goal posts and yell nogunz.

Learn something from this and then take a walk.

>They're saying they don't recommend it.
i can recomend you to not do alot of stupid shit, doesnt mean that its a good idea, just because you can do something doesnt mean you should

Okay, whatever you say boss.

Like I said, feel free to show me a .223 Remington stamped M16A1.

only nd's i saw were dumbfuck privates who couldnt clear crew serveds right and an LT cleaning his pistol. its a non issue you are fuckin nitpicking over. if he slung the shit on fire thats different
11b go eat a dick

Right, just like every gun manufacturer will tell you in their manual that their firearm is rated for standard pressure ammunition and +p is not recommended because it can kill you. It won't, but they're not going to recommend you shoot it.
>.223 Remington stamped
Doesn't exist, because NATO uses metric, moron.

Do you see "NATO" written anywhere in that picture? Before SS109 existed, 5.56mm was just the Military's designation for .223 Remington the same way M16 was the Military's designation for the AR-15

What unit didn't train as an 11b to operate the selector lever? You NG? We practice it everytime doing up downs, not to mention in Iraq you might be doing a plethora of other shit than your weapon needs to be on safe even after low ready or firing. It's pretty irresponsible especially for that cop, it shows a lack of training with his rifle

>Doesn't exist, because NATO uses metric, moron.

Put up or shut up, plebe.

Attached: 223vs556-e1446155529154.jpg (515x406, 38K)

101st and we trained with it all the time but people didnt do it in every single fuckin tick. nobody cared specially group they just left their shit on fire all the time unless it was slung or they were climbing over shit.

>want to hear people talk about nog shootings
>it's faggots arguing about 223 and 556 again

Attached: 1501474957096.jpg (693x490, 55K)

In 1970, NATO members signed an agreement to select a second, smaller caliber cartridge to replace the 7.62×51mm NATO cartridge.[11] Of the cartridges tendered, the .223 Remington (M193) was the basis for a new design created by FN Herstal. The FN-created cartridge was named 5.56×45mm NATO with a military designation of SS109 in NATO and M855 in the U.S.[12] These new SS109 ball cartridges required a 228 mm (1-in-9") twist rate while adequately stabilizing the longer L110 tracer projectile required an even faster 178 mm (1-in-7") twist rate.[5]

It seems you still don't understand you fucking imbecile. 5.56 NATO did not exist when the m16 was adopted by the USA. You mouthbreathing imbecile. The .223 Remington M193 ball was designated 5.56, because the US military in accordance with NATO standardization, called it by its metric measurement. M193, which the m16a1 is chambered for, is NOT 5.56 NATO. It predates 5.56 NATO and is designed to be fired from what we would today call a .223 chamber.

As 5.56 NATO did not exist when the m16a1 was put into service, this difference in nomenclature was a nonissue (just as it still is today, as there is no danger in firing 5.56 from a .223 rifle).

The M16A1 predates the 5.56 NATO chamber and SS109 cartridge by more than 10 years, idiot

I mean, sure, thanks for that whole lot of bullshit again. Like I said, I'll wait for you to finish arguing with yourself so you can show me SAMMI or CIP proclaiming .223 and 5.56 the same cartridge.

I'm not even sure why the retard brought up .223, you literally can't read the caliber designation, but it's clearly a colt AR. They're all 5.56, so he doesn't even have a reason to be chimping out in the first place. He's wrong on so many levels it's really incredible.

Well good thing it doesn't matter since you'll never own a 5.56 rifle.

>faggots arguing about 223 and 556 again
You don't even know where the decimal belongs in either of those, you are clearly a brainlet frustrated by his own ignorance on the matter

I mean, again, if all you've got to bitch about is "NOGUNZ" then you're pretty clearly aware of just how fucking wrong you are. I don't know why this is so hard for you. It's a pedantic topic that a lot of people are ignorant on. Now you're not, that's how learning works and this isn't very hard.

It's ok friend, if I couldn't own firearms I'd be upset too. I'll pray for you.

You know that feel when there's actually no difference between .223 and 5.56 other than case wall thickness and pressure meaning that literally any well built .223 can fire 5.56 anyway and anything else is a meme

Anything else here, or are you done embarrassing yourself cause to be honest, you're really starting to bore me with your ignorance.

Attached: Capture.jpg (952x708, 47K)

This faggot again

>MRP Upper
>Defender Lower
>Old roll mark

Gawd damn how old is that?

How in the name of fuck are these unsafe to fire in a SAAMI .223 chamber? You are regurgitating a simple CYA as if though it were comprehensive fact

Attached: c._1977[1].jpg (3264x2448, 1.69M)

Probably older than the idiot trying to argue with me.

oh wow, so you don't even have an excuse to be this retarded. Here I was giving you the benefit of the doubt and pretending you were a butthurt Eurotroll, but it turns out you actually own firearms and still don't know anything about them.

Be careful, try not to hurt yourself man. Because you clearly know a lot less than you think you do if you didn't even know chamber dimensions were changed between the m16a1 and later models.

Do it.

>Blanks

Well it's simple, they're different cartridges with different dimensions and pressure ratings. I also love how you are slowly but surely backing this conversation from "They're the same thing!" to "There's no practical difference guize!"

I have done it. You know what happens? The bullet shoots just like it should, but if you do it 10,000 times you'll get a little more throat erosion than you otherwise would.

Except for the fact that I never once stated you're going to, or are even likely to encounter problems because that wasn't the premise of the argument. That's just what your idiot ass turned it into when you realized your E-Peen was about to be wounded in action. I'm well the fuck aware that the likelihood of seeing an actual catastrophic failure resultant of using CIP specification 5.56 in an honest to god SAAMI .223 Remington specification chamber are almost zero. You would have to be firing CIP proof rounds by the magazine out of a .223 chamber.

But that wasn't the claim. The claim was that 5.56 and .223 are the same cartridge when they are fucking not because they have different dimensions and different pressure ratings. This is why you see different loads in reloading books for .223 and 5.56, because they're not the same fucking cartridge.

I hope you've learned something. Have a good evening.

>mag dumping on a busy street
It sounds like fuckin Syria, what were they thinking? This looks like suicide by cop btw

Take your L and walk kid.

>"There's no practical difference guize!"
Bullshit, my argument since the beginning was that ."223 Remington" and "5.56 NATO" are designations for the intended chamber, because the difference between M193 Ball and M855 Ball is *load* not *dimension*

>The claim was that 5.56 and .223 are the same cartridge when they are fucking not
Hmm, nah, the argument I saw was you flailing around that the rollmark on a m16a1 says 5.56 and that means it's chambered for 5.56, even though it is in actuality a .223 chamber, as no round with current 5.56x45 NATO dimensions existed yet, only the .223 Remington, which indeed was refered to as the US as 5.56. I'm glad you so clearly demonstrated you did not believe this so you can't backpedal and say that's now what you meant, like you're trying to do now.

It's good you were able to learn something, even though you're going to pretend you won an argument you have failed to make a single point in.
I'll still keep you in my prayers, if you're this wrong and upset about everything you must have a real hard time.

I mean, okay.

Attached: Capture.jpg (1119x75, 14K)

The cop also wasn't firing in full auto, you can clearly see his selector even.

Attached: try to cope.png (760x139, 9K)

So did this dude just drive by some random officers on the street, flash a gun at them, and then drive away to initiate a pursuit and shooting?

>Bodycam shoot video turns into a sperg war about 5.56 v. .223 Rem 2 comments in.

Attached: kill everyone.gif (440x233, 1.93M)

“We knew for a fact that this was the subject who tried to run over one of our officers the night before,” Baltimore Police Commissioner Michael Harrison said. “We knew for a fact it was the subject who fired upon an officer in a different part of the city. This subject could have caused harm to either more officers or other citizens throughout the night and throughout the day.”

What is .223 Remington's metric designation, dumb ass? Do you think every cartridge with 5.56 on its packaging has a NATO cross stamp?

"** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **
Baltimore police released the body-worn camera footage from the Aug, 28 shootout with a suspect on E. Fayette and N. Caroline Streets. Police later identified the suspect as Tyrone Domingo Banks, 30, of the 2200 block of E. Biddle Street. Police said Banks was the suspect they were looking for since Tuesday, Aug. 26 when he allegedly tried to strike one officer with a silver SUV he was driving and then fire at another officer. The officer was shot in the leg in the area of East Fairmount and Caroline, near East Fayette Street and has since been released from Shock Trauma. The family of the bystander says a bullet shattered her finger, and glass and bullet fragments entered her neck and chest."
>Tyrone Domingo Banks
god fucking dammit my sides literal Tyrone btfo

Attached: 911 did sandys cheeks.jpg (900x1193, 295K)

The dimensions are literally different.

Are you talking about the case wall? About as relevant as a primer crimp and cannelure

762x63 is the metric "designation" of 30-06

223 and 556 are different rounds

Do you think .300 Blackout and .300 Whisper are the same thing too?

And the m16a1, despite the rollmark stating it is 5.56, was not chambered for 5.56 NATO, but .223 Remington.

What?

Contrary to your statements in this thread, the m16a1 was not chambered for 5.56 NATO.

That's all.

not the person you were talking to before

Ah cool I'm only here for that argument but it looks like that guy left.

the death of the western dream.

what the cop is doing is the western dream mate

Oh look, no NATO crosses on any of these 5.56mm cartridges

Is there such a thing as a barrel marked 7.26x35?

Attached: 211611[1].jpg (3264x2448, 2.06M)

>suicide by cop
Definitely. Waving his gun like that makes it obvious.

YOU IDIOT. Where do you think those coordinates are, Mansly?!?

Police shooting at civilians is combat experience now?

Dude murdering Afghan dirt Farmers who occasionally have a China ak leaned up against a wall in their mudhut is combat experience.

What are you going to do when a real army fights you? Chase them in a Ford explorer and mag dump into the environment dude was panicky already


When was the last time you saw a video of a soldier being that hysterical in a firefight?

>random full auto spray in the middle of the street
what the fuck

'murica

lmao

youtube.com/watch?v=UllFP_CaAt4

This is pretty good. Also, keep thread relevant to kino body cams.

based donut operator

That was crazy, thanks for sharing

It's not full auto, the mic on the body cam was absolute shit tier

What are yall faggot talking about, i only hear semi auto fire

This is how they’ll hunt down every single assault rifle owner after trump is gone. Boogaloofail.webm

You stupid fuckheads, the M16A1 was chambered in 5.56x45. Its standard ball round was the M193. Fucking retard asshole posting up top about SS109/M855 not being chambered for the A1 series of rifles no shit brainiac. No kidding that was developed in the late 70s~1980 it was not developed for the A1 series. Smoke yourself.

>GO GO GO
>DRIVE, DRIVE
>takes his merry time
Lmao

Holy shit the thermal cam scene looks like a CGI scene from a movie

Why is USA a war zone? Is it the war on drugs?

It is. My dad worked for Goodrich contracted through the DOD working in thermal imaging shit and what’s even scarier is that he said protected gov only gps locators are even scarier to the degree of being able to tell you what pocket the device is in.

At 4:31 you can see the bullets, that's crazy.

youtu.be/v9vGHU1RsF0

Personal favourite

Attached: 1345601901860.gif (240x160, 596K)

Starts with an N, ends with RS