Can anyone clarify and explain to me if semi auto shotguns are as reliable as a pump shotgun? In this day and age are they possibly more reliable? I know that the old adage is that the pump shotgun is more reliable but is this really true? Can anyone show any solid testing or research? Forgive me if this is a stupid question I've never owned a semi auto shotgun, but I do own an old Winchester 1200 which works fine but it can be kind of clunky with racking a new round sometimes. Made me wonder if a semi auto is actually better since a mechanical device is technically more reliable under normal circumstances, as opposed to my human arms, which can fuck up especially under stress or pressure.
Any good suggestions for an affordable all-around semi auto that would be good for home defense and hunting? Affordable being the key
Semi: Can have charge problems with weaker loads, more moving parts to malfunction and/or break
Pump: More prone to human failure
Jacob Lewis
So if I was using buckshot or a load designed for turkey it shouldn't be prone to malfunctions as often right? But you're saying with target loads that are just designed for clay birds then it can fuck up? Makes sense, but I guess on a purely objective level a semi auto is more reliable because it removes the human error factor
Camden Price
>Can anyone clarify and explain to me if semi auto shotguns are as reliable as a pump shotgun? No, they're not as reliable as a pump shotgun. But that doesn't mean that they aren't reliable enough. You're talking about failure rates that are minuscule for both, as long as you know what you're doing with them. If you do, then the chance of failure for either is negligible.
Luis Martin
>if semi auto shotguns are as reliable as a pump shotgun? yes >In this day and age are they possibly more reliable? yes
Justin Campbell
It's really more a matter of poorfags doing what poorfags do best, grossly exaggerate failures of items they can't afford
Nathan Watson
The only expensive semi shotgun is the benelli m4 and you're paying for the meme inertial operating system and the CoD tax.
David Morgan
No. Again, are they plenty reliable? Yes. But more than a pump? No.
>inb4 but muh short stroking! That's a training issue, not a hardware issue. One of the biggest problems with people on this board is that they're constantly looking for hardware solutions to training issues. It's lazy and will bite you all in the ass someday, but you won't stop doing it because you'd rather just order some doodad from Fagpul than get off your fat butts and train properly.
Caleb Morales
The M4 is gas operated, and the m1 super which is inertia is around 800 just like franchi, beretta, and all other semi autos not made in turkey, besides the Mossberg 930.
Xavier Green
My Beretta 1301 has yet to have a malfunction. It has about 1k rounds of buck/bird shot blend without cleaning. There is no benefit to the manually operated shotgun.
Josiah Sanders
if you use real ammo any semi will be fine heres the thing they wont feed everything theres too much variation in shotgun shell for that. when you find one brand that works and only buy that then your set. the gun will work reliably. with a pump you can force these out of spec rounds into battery and shoot them. with a semi that round will jam. its not like theres only 1 brand of good ammo you can find plenty of options that will work in a semi. you just cant expect everything to work.
Wyatt Collins
>There is no benefit to the manually operated shotgun. Cost Ubiquity Simplicity Ease of cleaning/maintenance Aftermarket support Ability to cycle light or odd loads (like Minishells)
I'm not saying that you shouldn't buy an autoloader, but to say there aren't *any* advantages to pumps just isn't true.
Nolan Reed
>Cost Sure >Ubiquity Anything can become ubiquitous >Simplicity Semi auto is simple just pull the trigger >Ease of cleaning/maintenance Maintenance is still simple >Aftermarket support It's a shotgun Ability to cycle light or odd loads (like Minishells) Fair, although I do not personally care about this
I sold all of my pump shotguns. Don't even remotely regret it.
Brandon Miller
>Any good suggestions for an affordable all-around semi auto that would be good for home defense and hunting? Affordable being the key If reliable is the most important with a side of affordable then the 1301 is kinda the current favorite at around $1000. If affordable is the key and reliable is a little less important then the mossberg 930 series is the obvious choice. Not to imply that the 930s are bad guns or anything, but they just tend to be more prone to low power or adverse conditions induced malfunctions from my mild degree of research on the topic. Giving the gun a moderate amount of break in and possibly changing out a couple of parts tends to fix that(930s can have weird severe humidity induced issues). OTOH many people would also argue that the 1301 really needs an aftermarket bolt release to be GTG for defensive use, as the stock one can super jam the gun if used improperly. With a few hundred rounds of break, and maybe a little trouble shooting depending on the gun and locale, in the 930 should be GTG. Its a shame that Remington doesn't offer a plane jane defensive version of their versa max, as those have a great reputation for reliability, and could probably retail for 750-800 making for a nice in between choice.
Jaxson Nelson
>>Simplicity >Semi auto is simple just pull the trigger I didn't mean ease of shooting it. I meant mechanical simplicity. >>Aftermarket support >It's a shotgun Nothing - absolutely nothing - has the kind of aftermarket support that the 870 and 500 do. They're the only shotguns whose aftermarket options are up there with the AR and the 10/22. Even the most popular autoloaders don't have a fraction of the aftermarket those two guns do.
Nathan Reyes
What kind of aftermarket doodads would you even want to put on a $300 pump shotgun? I'm gonna put a light, extended tube, and MRO on my Beretta at some point. The parts for this all exist. What else could you want?
Dylan Davis
My $180 Maverick 88, with probably $500 worth of aftermarket on it.
They are to a point. But the beauty of the shotgun is how versatile it is. Semi-autos are great, but they tend to not be able to cycle lower power ammunition. A manual action shotgun can cycle any type of ammo you put into it. Including specialty ammunition.
Ideally, I'd like to see dual mode shotguns to become a thing. Like the SPAS-12/15 and Benelli M3 do.
Michael Richardson
Good looking shotgun. I'm considering that stock. How do you like it?
Thomas Russell
Comfiest stock I've ever had on any gun. Liked it so much I went out and got the Magpul stock for my Ruger American, too.
Jayden Phillips
In the imaginary perfect world, the semi auto shotgun would have like 97% reliability where the pump would be 100%
In the real world, people fuck up cycling the bolt even under calm range circumstances, let alone under stress. Semi autos remove that once extra chance of fucking up your shot, at cost of maybe one extra malfunction in 5000 rounds
Jace Butler
It had a better function at a rate of 99.999% or better. 3% of 5000 rounds is 150 malfunctions. That's a ton. A gun that fails 3% of the time belongs in the garbage.
Kayden Howard
Semis will generally not be as reliable as a pump shotgun. This is because unlike semi rifles, shotgun shells vary MUCH more in pressure due to the sheer variety of factory loads. Low brass birdshot will produce much less gas and energy to cycle an action compared to a 3 inch slug, and trying to make a shotgun cycle both inevitably causes tradeoffs in reliability, recoil, and wear.
Kevin Ward
Another issue with semis, even if you are arguing that they are as reliable as pumps, is the severity of malfunctions. A pump having a malfunction is just one more pump away from a cleared shotgun. A semi having a malfunction is very often going to shut you down. Shells get jammed or stuck somewhere and then it takes a lot more effort to clear than a pump action.
Nicholas Jenkins
ok but a mechanism is still more reliable than a human
Gabriel Rogers
with your logic we should all be using muskets, horses, and friction fire
also let me guess you're into martial arts
Bentley Perez
OP here
holy mixed answers batman, so can anyone provide any solid research to back up what they're saying? Both sides seem to make sense but this input could all just be lore, and not hard evidence. Are there any solid experiments that have been done out there to compare the reliability of the two types of shotguns?
Gabriel Cox
Complex question basically this Okay, so I used a turkey gun which is designed to shoot 3 1/2inch magnum rounds for sporting clays because it was A)cheap and B) had a long barrel. Unless I shoot hot 2 3/4 inch rounds, it does not feed properly (stovepipe). This has made me fucking beast mode at clearing malfunctions, which happens maybe 1/200 shots (I can clear and hit the second target most of the time which allows about 2 seconds to clear, reload, acquire target and fire).
So acknowledging this, let's look at the two types of shotgun, Gas operated and Recoil operated. Gas operated: >lower recoil >more prone to not cycle due to loads being too weak >slower cycle Recoil operated: >more recoil >faster cycle >more reliable
Now remember, if you are shooting magnum loads, you will not have reliability issues. If you are shooting light loads, and your gun is designed for something else, you are more likely to have problems (I really can not emphasize design enough, you need to know what you want to shoot before you buy, and DO NOT get an overbored barrel, it reduces pressure and makes you UNABLE TO SHOOT SLUGS).
That all being said, almost no shotgun will reliably cycle the "shorty
William Brooks
I still love 870s but I want a semi at some point.