Bodycam Video Shows Scene From Police Shootout in Baltimore, Maryland

Thoughts?
youtube.com/watch?v=2QQul-WKDx4

Attached: 1.png (933x479, 618K)

>Thoughts?
That Baltimore is a shithole infested with rats.

Baltimoristan looks comfy

t. jihadi recently relocated from the Sudan

SCOTT V. HARRIS
In the 2007 Scott v. Harris decision, “The Supreme Court refused to fashion a rule requiring law enforcement officers to abandon pursuit of fleeing suspects whenever they drive so recklessly that they place the lives of the public in danger,”

The suspect sued because the deputy’s pursuit-ending maneuver caused a crash that rendered him a quadriplegic. Both the district and circuit courts had agreed that the deputy’s actions could constitute deadly force as determined by a reasonable jury, but SCOTUS ruled 8-1 that the deputy’s actions were reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, as the suspect’s reckless driving “posed an actual and imminent threat” to other motorists and the officers involved in the pursuit.

Gun control working well I see

PLUMHOFF V. RICKARD
In 2014, SCOTUS again sided with police officers pursuing extremely reckless drivers. The case centered on a high-speed chase that ended with the deaths of the fleeing driver and his passenger.

The decision, written by Justice Samuel Alito Jr., considered the precedent established in Graham v. Connor that considers the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene and ruled that the suspect’s “outrageously reckless driving posed a grave public safety risk.”

The ruling in Plumhoff v. Rickard recognizes the extreme threat to public safety posed by reckless drivers and says the Fourth Amendment allows the use of deadly force to stop them.

“The Supreme Court determined that the suspect vehicle and its driver posed a clear threat, and shooting to end that threat was both practical and appropriate,

>drive like a bat out of hell
>get sacked by a bigger bat from a bigger hell
>wtf u cant do dis

Thanks, my coworkers were just talking about this the other day and were adamantly arguing "no it WAS voted into law"

>steps in front of moving car
>"ASSAULT ON AN OFFICER ASSAULT ON AN OFFICER SHOOT SHOOT SHOOT SHOOT!!!!!"

I’m concerned about their disregard for everyone around them while they shoot off 5.56

Argabrite v. Neer.
A case decided by the Ohio Supreme Court in December 2016 followed these precedents, shielding officers from legal liability following a high-speed chase. In the summary judgment, Justice Judith French writes, “We expect law enforcement officers to protect the public, but that expectation need not mean that an officer must sit idly by while a suspect flees the scene of a crime, particularly when the suspect’s flight itself endangers the general public further.”

imo its what happens when you hire nothing but veterans.

Did you watch the video?
Or just spouting off your anti cop views.
Cops were shooting at the driver because the driver was pointing a firearm and shooting indiscriminately. Driver was a danger not only to cops, but all people in the area,
Cops were right to shoot the driver.

That's like popping off some rounds in times square then suing the NYPD for shooting you because they could've potentially shot a bystander

Attached: 1554860300212.jpg (1024x1024, 198K)

I agree with this. Soldiers make bad cops and cops make bad soldiers.

Completely different worlds in terms of the application of force.

i think its possible for vets to be good cops the issue is that when you take them out of their army man costume and then put them into a police man costume and its the exact same shit shit but black it sets a precedent.

id be interested to see if putting cops back in dress blues and giving them m14s and 1911s changes their attitudes.

meant mini-14s not m14s but that would be funny

I'm sure the suspect was totally thinking the same thing as he popped off rounds

Attached: 1554484533008.jpg (380x349, 62K)

who cares? cops are paid to be and are expected to be professional, criminals aren't.

The officer was shooting his ar15 as the car drives buy - the backstop was other cars, pedestrians, businesses and homes. (with people in them)
The officer can also be seen shooting down the street. Again ...the backstop was other cars, pedestrians, businesses and homes. (with people in them)

This police officer should be let go and barred from being a police officer Anywhere.
He should also be mentally evaluated to see if fit to own firearms.

That's an interesting point.

Cops getting jocked up in military equipment to be peace officers is a strange conflict of character. On one hand they're supposed to enforce law by apprehending criminals, arbitrate civil matters, and generally keep the peace. But if you kit them out to fight and they're whole mentality may lean in that direction.

This.

Heck, even in the movie HEAT, the script/director took the time to make sure that Al Pacino's character was on the radio saying "take clean shots, watch your background!"

yea as an officer theres no excuse for what he did. NONE. Theres no room for error. Either do your job perfectly or go find another line of work.

You are human we understand - thats why you shouldn't be a cop.

Attached: cop types .jpg (1779x828, 230K)

> image made by t. manlet

Attached: boaEjCY.gif (323x221, 208K)

>loves to give press conferences

Attached: tenor.gif (498x280, 1.85M)

deport all the blacks & latinx and we won't have shit like this happening as much or at all

You forgot old mustached cop, asshole rating 20, characteristics: worked rural sheriffs office since the 90s and blatantly ignores NFA violations

Everything from 1:51 - 2:00 is dangerous as hell.

I believe he had the safety off for the whole pursuit, I'm bet that's not department policy

Once use has been established, the condition of the weapon doesn’t matter. (most departments)

Trying to use facts is racist, quads-boy.

kek, yeup there's a lot of based sheriffs that have straight-up told their libtard governors to get bent over gun and mag capacity restrictions

>probably won't shoot your dog
>probably has a full-auto carbine in his car

Stfu nerd. You'd shit your cargo shorts if you had been there.

samefag

rtg cop is Vallejo's McLaughlin.

The biggest issue is the Officer out of cover in the open at 4:28. The Officer should have remained behind cover, fired as necessary, and only left cover to move up as part of the immediate action team.

The shooting at 1:51 looks dangerous but it's shaky bodycam footage taken in low light so I'm not seeing the exact view the Officer is seeing. There's a potential he's got a really clean angle on the driver who at that moment needed to be shot just as much there's a potential he didn't.

Given that the most common law enforcement firearm is a Glock, most department's do not care about the status of a manual safety during an active critical incident. They care about the 4 fundamentals of firearm safety but manipulating the manual safety is not one of those fundamentals.