What are the differences be LPKs?

Are there really any crazy differences between a 60$ LPK and a 120$ one?

Attached: STLS030-CFA__45942.1558128000.1280.1280.jpg (1200x674, 354K)

Other urls found in this thread:

midwayusa.com/product/1007370226
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Are you talking LPK less trigger group?

Doesn't matter to me, but for the sake of discussion lets say the kits come with trigger group and all the basics, i know some triggers and better for different things, but in terms of milspec, are these kits varying in any quality in any radical amount, or is it similar to lowers where they mostly come from the same group of manufacturers?

The minor parts like the springs, detents, mag catch, etc, are all the same.

Either major parts may be missing (like no trigger group), or the major parts like the trigger may be of varying quality. For example, GI spec trigger vs. aftermarket trigger. Standard safety vs. ambi safety, etc.

If the parts are all milspec then no, they aren't varying in quality any appreciable amount.

I guess what my concern is, is what LPK is the best, i get mixed opinions saying BCM is the best, better than colt bla bla bla, and then I hear that PSA lower parts kits are just as good. I just want the truth.

he doesnt use match grade springs and detents
pleb

I just want a LPK that lasts a long ass time, almost forever, there any kits like this?

IME there is zero difference regarding the small parts like I mentioned in .

If you just want GI spec parts then buy whatever's the cheapest. If you want to go from there I'd advise buying a very basic kit (no trigger, grip, etc.) and buying those additional parts individually to suit your needs. Which ones are "best" depends on your specific application. I wouldn't go putting a benchrest trigger on a defensive weapon, for example.

save for the trigger group, the bits are so cheap it doesn't matter.
>oh no my safety spring is wearing out
>guess I'll just get a new one for 5 cents