Change my mind this is the pinnacle of aircraft design

Change my mind this is the pinnacle of aircraft design

Attached: CA5ADC04-8258-4EB3-9A4B-6EB0855EE60E.jpg (4032x2642, 2.59M)

It's not an F-14.

For CAS there's basically nothing better, and it's the only prop-driven CAS aircraft ever to have shot down a jet fighter, so there's that.

You misspelled A-10

tailwheels are dumb

Wrong

Attached: Junkers-Ju-88C-1.NJG2-(R4+HH)-Bohme-Sicily-02.jpg (984x673, 319K)

t. pussy baby trigear nigger who can't control his life much less a grounded airplane

That's cool, but can it make all of the personnel in an airbase sick to their stomachs?

Protip: No it can't. That's probably a good thing.

Attached: SCREEEEEEEEEEEE.jpg (960x655, 174K)

Is that the AD?

>can't control his life much less a grounded airplane
Fuck you, that's too far.

HIGHWAY TO THE DANGER-ZONE

Misspelled Mighty Wings

piston > jet

Attached: Hercules timing gears.jpg (3264x2448, 659K)

For me, its the P-51

Attached: miss america warbird reno.jpg (2048x1536, 319K)

What sort of space magic is this?

Read the title. Timing gears for the hercules engine.

A Po-2 once got a maneuvre kill against an F-94, so not the only and certainly not the first one

>not the jug
yeah that's gonna be a no from me dawg

Attached: 45577378_2208215779446828_2203284015370722695_n.jpg (1080x946, 74K)

This is the future. Distributed electric VTOL aircraft.

They are objectively happening. This is a Boeing and NASA project already approved by the FAA, so don't even hit me with that stupid normie "Dehhhhh I got U!" bullshit.

Attached: PAV_ContentImage_500x250_1.jpg (500x250, 67K)

another one.

I'm in the process of designing an Ultralight version of this. Probably won't have a pusher prop, but it doesn't need it.

Attached: PAV_Carousel_100x563_4.jpg (1000x563, 338K)

>Distributed electric VTOL aircraft.
No

t. omega boomer.

I think he's using the cop-out of specifying CAS aircraft. Plenty of piston-engine planes have downed jet fighters but the Skyraider is probably the only one designed as a dedicated attacker. The Po-2/U-2 was a trainer, the F4U-4B and Sea Fury were both technically fighters, and in WWII I'm not familiar with anything but fighters and maybe bomber turrets downing jets.

Is it just so complicated cuz the Hercules had sleeve valves?

I always found the phrases "X is the future", "X is happening", "When X takes over " incredible annoying and arrogant

Yeah usually radial engines have a pretty simple double edged cam wheel (one for inlet ine for outlet) which is slaved to the crankshaft. Nice and simple. The Hercules was your typical over engineered bong POS. Same goes for the Napier sabre. Bongs had a hardon for sleeve valves which were the solution to a problem that didnt even exist. You can imagine how much power is lost inside such a complicated swiss watch

It's cute!

Attached: 0c8a090382338d3731dad7671a592b94.jpg (1800x1211, 245K)

I will forever love the put the biggest engine in the smallest airframe design philosophy.

literally zero advantages over a nosewheel except for boomer cred and backcountry landings, which for a carrier aircraft are ????

Attached: Untitled.png (2591x1164, 414K)

how many ad's are in the ad family?

Seven before you start counting prototypes and sub-variants.

Best plane coming through

Attached: 4DA0C55EFAFF4692B083DA66D374E8FA.jpg (650x384, 59K)

He said SHOT DOWN.

It really is. As a CAS plane. Even then it got shot down in the hundreds back in Nam by 60's era tech. What these Tucanocucksters today don't realize is that their CAS du jour will be eaten alive by modern shoulder fired SAMs.